Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03197610

The Effect of Enamel Matrix Derivatives on Root Coverage Esthetic Score

Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) are accepted as the gold standard in covering denuded root surfaces. Combining enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) with periodontoplasic surgical operations is another method in covering denuded root surface. The aim of this study is to compare a SCTG operation group and EMD applied group in addition to SCTG using complete root coverage rate and a newer method root coverage esthetic scoring system (RES).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Background: Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) are accepted as the gold standard in covering denuded root surfaces. Combining enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) with periodontoplasic surgical operations is another method in covering denuded root surface. The aim of this study is to compare a SCTG operation group and EMD applied group in addition to SCTG using complete root coverage rate and a newer method root coverage esthetic scoring system (RES).

Methods: This is a split-mouth and controlled study. Thirthy-eight Class I or II gingival recession defects at canine teeth were treated in the control (SCTG) (n=19) and test groups (n=19) (SCTG+EMD). The root coverage esthetic score were evaluated by 2 blind periodontists 1 year after the treatment using RES. The agreement between the two periodontists was assessed by kappa analysis. Complete root coverage rate was evaluated for both groups. Two groups were compared with statistically methods in terms of RES parameters and gingival recession height /width.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient had no systemic disease, did not smoke cigarette and tobacco products, did not have a pregnancy and breastfeeding period, had class I and class II gingival recession according to the Miller gingival classification, had a recession depth of ≥2 mm, have not had a restoration and have had an operation in the relevant dental region that had no previous gingival surgical procedure were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria

  • systemic disease
  • multiple gingival recession
  • miller class III and IV recessions were excluded

Treatment and study plan

enamel matrix derivatives

Procedure

enamel matrix derivatives and subepithelial connective tissue grafts

Primary outcomes

  1. root coverage percentage

    Time frame: 1 year

    root coverage percentage of denuded root surface

  2. root coverage aesthetic score

    Time frame: 1 year

    root coverage aesthetic score of treatment modalities

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yuzuncu Yil University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jun 23, 2017
Registry last updated
Jun 23, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.