Education and telephone follow-up intervention
OtherA telephone follow up and a pre-discharge education
NCT Number: NCT03771937
In this parallel randomized controlled trial (n = 33/group), the control group received routine care, while the intervention group received a telephone follow-up intervention, which consisted of a pre-discharge education program and three telephone follow-up sessions based on the Roy Adaptation Model.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Objective: To evaluate the effect of education and telephone follow-up intervention based on the Roy Adaptation Model (RAM) for improving MI patients' self-efficacy, quality of life and lifestyle adaptation.
Methods: In this parallel randomized controlled trial (n = 33/group), the control group received routine care, while the intervention group received a telephone follow-up intervention, which consisted of a pre-discharge education program and three telephone follow-up sessions based on the RAM. Data were collected before discharge, and in the 12th week after discharge included quality of life, coping adaptation process, self-efficacy and lifestyle changes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A telephone follow up and a pre-discharge education
Time frame: 12 week
The self-efficacy levels of the patients were measured by the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). The GSES contains 10 items and each item score ranges from 0 to 5. Cronbach's α of the GSES was 0.83. The highest and lowest possible score is between 10-40. High score indicates that the individual perceives high self-efficacy.
Time frame: 12 week
To evaluate the coping and adaptation processes, the Coping and Adaptation (CAPS) scale was used. The CAPS was developed by Callista Roy. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Çatal and Dicle (2015), and the Cronbach alpha value was 0.82 for the total scale. The highest and lowest possible score is between 47-188. Higher scores indicate better use of effective coping methods.
Time frame: 12 week
To evaluate the quality of life after the disease, the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) was used. This was developed by Thompson et al. in 2002. The Cronbach alpha values of the scale were found in seven dimensions, and ranged from 0.74 to 0.95, showing it to be a useful and highly reliable tool. The validity and reliability study of the scale was made by Yilmaz et al. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.79 to 0.90. The 10 highest and lowest possible score is between 0-100, with 0 indicating the best health condition, and 100 indicating the worst health condition.
Akdeniz University
Other
The Effect of Education and Telephone Follow-up Intervention Based on the Roy Adaptation Model After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT03161678
Cardiovascular Diseases, Embolism and Thrombosis
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04123197
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial Details