Craniosacral therapy
Othersubtle form of applied touch, type of osteopathy
NCT Number: NCT05722756
This observational, retrospective study has shown, that the addition of craniosacral therapy to the Vojta method has improved the effects of the therapy in 6 months follow-up period. The chance for improvement was 9.42 times higher in Vojta + craniosacral group compared to the group conducted only with Vojta method.
The study results suggest that the craniosacral procedure should be considered as an additive regimen to the Vojta method in the therapy of children with central coordination disorders (CCD) . More data is still needed to improve the rehabilitation process in this group of patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 month–6 month
All sexes
Observational
The aim of the retrospective, observational study was the comparison between the effectiveness of Vojta therapy used alone and its combination with craniosacral therapy after 6 months of the therapy.
Data for analysis was from one Rehabilitation Center and covered the observation period: January 1, 2014 - November 30, 2019. The data was analyzed for the purpose of the study between January 1, 2022 - July 1, 2022.
To assess the effectiveness of the mentioned rehabilitation models for the children with central coordination disorders (CCD), the neurological status of the patient, expressed as the number of abnormal reactions (Vojta tests), at the beginning (W0) and after 6 months (W6) of the therapy was recorded blindly, based on the individual's records (collected previously for the purpose of the other study). Children who had completed six months of therapy and had efficacy results documented in their medical records were divided into group A (children treated with Vojta therapy alone) and group B (children treated with Vojta therapy combined with craniosacral therapy). Information about: the age at which the children started therapy, the APGAR score at the first minute of their life, the week in which they were born, mode of delivery, sex, birth weight, mother's age at delivery and duration of breastfeeding, was also collected to compare the groups.
Finally data from 32 children in group A and 19 children in group B was analyzed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
(medical history was excluded from the analysis even if one of the following exclusion criteria was met):
subtle form of applied touch, type of osteopathy
Time frame: 6 months
improvement: fewer number of the abnormal reactions present when compare to the first visit no improvement- at least the same number (or more) of abnormal reactions present when compare to the first visit
Wroclaw Medical University
Other
Comparison of Rehabilitation Techniques: Vojta vs Vojta and Craniosacral Therapy, in Children With Central Nervous Coordination Disorders.
Acronym: COREHNERV
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05318976
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06249776
Brain Diseases, Brain Infarction
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
View Trial DetailsNCT05963828
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05590884
Body Indication, Central Nervous System Diseases
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details