Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05722756

The Effect of Craniosacral Therapy as Additive Procedure.

This observational, retrospective study has shown, that the addition of craniosacral therapy to the Vojta method has improved the effects of the therapy in 6 months follow-up period. The chance for improvement was 9.42 times higher in Vojta + craniosacral group compared to the group conducted only with Vojta method.

The study results suggest that the craniosacral procedure should be considered as an additive regimen to the Vojta method in the therapy of children with central coordination disorders (CCD) . More data is still needed to improve the rehabilitation process in this group of patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 month–6 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

The aim of the retrospective, observational study was the comparison between the effectiveness of Vojta therapy used alone and its combination with craniosacral therapy after 6 months of the therapy.

Data for analysis was from one Rehabilitation Center and covered the observation period: January 1, 2014 - November 30, 2019. The data was analyzed for the purpose of the study between January 1, 2022 - July 1, 2022.

To assess the effectiveness of the mentioned rehabilitation models for the children with central coordination disorders (CCD), the neurological status of the patient, expressed as the number of abnormal reactions (Vojta tests), at the beginning (W0) and after 6 months (W6) of the therapy was recorded blindly, based on the individual's records (collected previously for the purpose of the other study). Children who had completed six months of therapy and had efficacy results documented in their medical records were divided into group A (children treated with Vojta therapy alone) and group B (children treated with Vojta therapy combined with craniosacral therapy). Information about: the age at which the children started therapy, the APGAR score at the first minute of their life, the week in which they were born, mode of delivery, sex, birth weight, mother's age at delivery and duration of breastfeeding, was also collected to compare the groups.

Finally data from 32 children in group A and 19 children in group B was analyzed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • CCD (central coordination disorders) diagnosis based on the paediatrician's opinion with a decision that the child needs rehabilitation;
  • a score of 8- 10 on the APGAR scale in the first minute of life;
  • no major birth defects documented that can push the diagnosis into the diagnosis of genetic disorders;
  • the age of the child at the time of the assessment of its eligibility for rehabilitation: 1-6 months (of life), calculated based on completed months of life;
  • available information regarding an abnormal result of the Vojta test, defined as at least 6 abnormal reactions (marked as abnormal [AN], or delayed [OP] in the test report) with abnormal muscle tension, which indicates moderate to severe CCD;
  • available information regarding the first medical examination (during the first visit (W0)), and a follow-up visit after 6 months (W6) on the determined date, maintaining the defined timeframe (5.5-6 months after W0).

Exclusion criteria

(medical history was excluded from the analysis even if one of the following exclusion criteria was met):

  • children who obtained a score of < 8 points on the APGAR scale in the first minute of life;
  • suspicion of any major (significant) birth defect, congenital defect syndrome (e.g. Down syndrome, Sotos syndrome) and/or indications for consultation at Genetics Clinic based on paediatric records;
  • age < 1 month or > 6 months;
  • < 6 abnormal reactions during the Vojta test at the first eligibility visit, which indicates mild or very mild CCD.

Treatment and study plan

Craniosacral therapy

Other

subtle form of applied touch, type of osteopathy

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in the number of abnormal reactions (assessed by the Vojta tests)

    Time frame: 6 months

    improvement: fewer number of the abnormal reactions present when compare to the first visit no improvement- at least the same number (or more) of abnormal reactions present when compare to the first visit

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Wroclaw Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Rehabilitation Techniques: Vojta vs Vojta and Craniosacral Therapy, in Children With Central Nervous Coordination Disorders.

Acronym: COREHNERV

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Feb 10, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 10, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.