Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06142448

The Effect of Compensation Strategies on Gait Impairment in Parkinson's Disease

Gait disturbances are disabling and common in Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients use many different, and typically self-developed, strategies to compensate for their walking abnormalities. There is a wide variety of compensatory strategies, of which external and internal cueing are the most commonly known. External cueing refers to externally produced predictive stimuli such as a metronome, whereas internal cueing refers to a movement reference generated internally, such as counting while walking. The efficacy of external and internal cueing varies dramatically across patients, and some patients can even be identified as 'non-responders' to a particular cue. Consequently, a one-size-fits-all approach simply does not suffice, which increases the need for better understanding of the key mechanisms behind these compensation strategies. Furthermore, it is still unknown how the efficacy of compensation strategies changes longitudinally. The goal of the UNITE-PD project is to address these questions. The investigators aim to investigate whether the efficacy of internal and external cueing changes over time, and whether it is differentially affected in responders and non-responders. In order to work towards a more personalized treatment for patients with PD, the investigators also aim to identify potential patient characteristics that can mediate the actual use of compensation strategies in daily life.

The multicenter UNITE-PD project is divided in a joint package and individual site-specific packages. All partners will investigate the neural working mechanisms of compensation strategies in PD from different angles in the site-specific packages. The joint package focusses on the long-term effect of the compensation strategies and the potential patient characteristics that can influence the efficacy of the compensation strategies. In this project, the investigators will define responders and non-responders to external and/or internal cueing. With the use of extensive clinimetrics, the aim is to identify patient characteristics that might influence the efficacy. With the use of a custom made cueing app (which will be applied during a follow up period of six months), the long-term effect of cueing in the responders can be investigated.

Together, all centers aim to include a total of 384 participants (Netherlands N = 104, Belgium N =90, Israel N = 75, Italy N = 115). Importantly, this sample size is not based on the joint workpackage described here, but on the numbers needed for the individual site-specific work packages.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Radboudumc

Nijmegen, Netherlands

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Cindel Albers

CONTACT

[email protected]

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women of age > 18 years with idiopathic Parkinson's disease;
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Daily usage of compensation strategies for the past month;
  • Presence of deep brain stimulation (DBS);
  • Presence of severe co-morbidity limiting ambulation (e.g. stroke, orthopaedic problems);
  • Inability to walk unaided (with the exception of a customary cane);
  • Inability to walk for > 3 minutes consecutively;
  • Severe auditory impairments, hampering perception of auditory cues;
  • Severe cognitive impairment (MMSE < 21)

Treatment and study plan

Cueing app

Device

All participants that are included come to the movement lab for the baseline measurement. The baseline measurement consists out of extensive clinimetrics (for example MDS-UPDRS) to identify patient characteristics. With the use of an objective gait assessment, the effectiveness of both internal and external cueing is determined. This will divide the participants in three groups; responders, non-responders and in between. Participants who clearly respond to either internal or external cueing (determined as the responders) are asked to apply the working form of cueing in daily life during the six-month follow-up. During this period the participants will use a mobile application that can provide them with a rhythmic auditory stimulus and records the use of this application.

After 6 months, both the responders and non-responders are asked to return to the lab for the follow up measurement in which the baseline measurement is repeated to evaluate the effect of long-term cueing.

Primary outcomes

  1. Gait Variability

    Time frame: Six months

    Gait variability defined as the coefficient of variation of stride time. We will compare gait variability between the baseline condition, and the cueing conditions.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gait speed

    Time frame: Six months

    Gait speed defined in meters per second

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Cindel Albers

CONTACT

[email protected]

(024) 366 84 26

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
  • KU Leuven
  • Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Registry information

Official study title

Unravelling the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Compensation Strategies for Gait Impairments in Parkinson's Disease: a Transnational, Multimodal Approach

Acronym: UNITE-PD

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 21, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.