Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00565383

The Effect of Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia on the Success of External Cephalic Version (ECV) for Breech Position

We aim to answer the clinical question: Does combined spinal-epidural analgesia improve the success rate of external cephalic version? We hypothesize that neuraxial analgesia (spinal or epidural analgesia) during version for breech presentation increases successful fetal rotation and decreases the incidence of Cesarean delivery for malpresentation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

At term 2 to 3% of singleton pregnancies are in breech presentation. Many of these deliveries are managed by cesarean delivery due to higher neonatal morbidity associated with vaginal breech delivery. Cesarean delivery, the safer option for the baby, however, is associated with a higher incidence of maternal complications for both the current and subsequent pregnancies. External cephalic version is a procedure commonly used to attempt to manually rotate the fetus into vertex position. This facilitates vaginal delivery and thus avoids higher maternal and/or neonatal complications.

Obstetricians perform versions after 36 weeks gestational age with a reportable success rate of 30-80%. The most common technique involves external manipulation of the fetal position preceded by pharmacologic uterine relaxation. Pain relief is most commonly provided in the form of intravenous opioids such as fentanyl. A more efficacious form of analgesia is the use of neuraxial opioids and local anesthetics (neuraxial analgesia), a technique commonly used for labor and delivery analgesia.

Although the use of neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia techniques improve maternal pain and satisfaction, there is conflicting evidence if they improve the success rate of version procedures. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has stated, "Currently there is not enough evidence to make a recommendation favoring or opposing anesthesia during ECV (external cephalic version) attempts."

We propose to conduct a prospective, single blinded, randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success rate of external version for breech fetal position and the subsequent incidence of vaginal vs. Cesarean delivery as a secondary outcome.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-55 years of age
  • Female
  • Pregnant
  • Breech Presentation
  • Greater than 36 Weeks gestation
  • Version Procedure

Exclusion criteria

  • Under 18 or over 55 years of age

Treatment and study plan

Combined spinal-epidural analgesia

Procedure

Combined spinal-epidural

Intravenous fentanyl (50mcg)

Procedure

Intravenous fentanyl

Primary outcomes

  1. Does combined spinal-epidural analgesia improve the success rate of external cephalic version?

    Time frame: Time between analgesia intervention for the version procedure and delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mode of delivery

    Time frame: At delivery

  2. Maternal satisfaction

    Time frame: Between analgesic intervention and the completion of the version procedure

  3. Maternal Pain

    Time frame: Between analgesic intervention and termination of the version procedure

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia on the Success of External Cephalic Version for Breech Position

Acronym: Version

Important dates

Study start
2002
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2006
First posted
Nov 30, 2007
Registry last updated
Jun 13, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.