Furosemide intravenous solution
DrugAdministrated as an 80 mg intravenous bolus every 24 hours in both arms and then as a continuous infusion dosed according to the experimental arm.
NCT Number: NCT04393493
In double-blind clinical trial, determine renal recovery with two different furosemide strategies in patients with type 1 cardiorenal syndrome.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
HCG, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
In a patient with type 1 cardiorenal syndrome, we tried to compare two Furosemide strategies: both with a morning bolus, and randomized in two groups:
Group A: Furosemide 80 mg every 24 hrs (morning) intravenously every 24 hrs for 4 consecutive days, additionally:
Group B: Furosemide 80 mg every 24 hrs (morning) intravenously every 24 hrs for 4 consecutive days, additionally:
ution + Chlortalidone 50mg VO every 24 hours + Spironolactone 25mg VO every 24 hrs.
With the primary objective of improving renal function measured by serum creatinine, as secondary objectives the efficacy in vascular decongestion and electrolyte alterations.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Administrated as an 80 mg intravenous bolus every 24 hours in both arms and then as a continuous infusion dosed according to the experimental arm.
One 50 mg pill administrated every 24 hours in group B
One 50 mg pill administrated every 24 hours in group B
Time frame: Up to 96 hours after intervention started
Comparing patient's baseline serum creatinine (previous serum creatinine of 3 months ago and up to a year ago) with creatinine measurements every 24 hours during intervention (4 days)
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Urine output was collected through an urinary catheter and measured and registered by a nurse. The sum of these registrations from 7 am from one day to 7 am of the next day was considered the 24 hour urinary output
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum creatinine at day one minus serum creatinine at 96 hrs after intervention started
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Time frame: From day one of intervention up to discharge, an average of 1 week
Time frame: From day one after discharge up to an average of 161 days
Time frame: Up to 96 hours after intervention started
Dyspnea improvement was referred by the patient as the clinician asked them "do you feel more or less difficult to breathe?" or if the liters per minute or the fraction of inspired supplementary oxygen necessary to maintain an oxygen saturation >90% were diminished
Time frame: Up to 3 days after intervention started
Dyspnea improvement was referred by the patient as the clinician asked them "do you feel more or less difficult to breathe?" or if the liters per minute or the fraction of inspired supplementary oxygen necessary maintain an oxygen saturation >90% were diminished
Time frame: Up to 4 days after intervention started
Dyspnea improvement was referred by the patient as the clinician asked them "do you feel more or less difficult to breathe?" or if the liters per minute or the fraction of inspired supplementary oxygen necessary maintain an oxygen saturation >90% were diminished
Time frame: Up to 96 hours after intervention started
The requirement of renal replacement therapy was assessed by the nephrology team in charge
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum copeptin levels at day one minus serum copeptin levels measured at 96 hrs after intervention started
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Baseline levels were defined as the measurement at hospital admission. Calculated as serum brain natriuretic peptide levels at baseline minus serum brain natriuretic peptide levels at 96 hours after intervention started
Time frame: Up to 96 hours after intervention started
Baseline levels were defined as the measurement at hospital admission
Time frame: From the beginning of intervention and before 96 hours after that
Clinical improvement was referred as remission of symptoms with achievement of 24 hour urine output equal or greater than 3000 milliliters
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum urea levels at day one of intervention minus serum urea levels at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum sodium levels at day one of intervention minus serum sodium levels at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum potassium levels at day one of intervention minus serum potassium levels at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum chloride levels at day one of intervention minus serum chloride levels at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum magnesium levels at day one of intervention minus serum magnesium levels at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum calcium levels at day one of intervention minus serum calcium levels at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum pH value at day one of intervention minus serum pH value at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum bicarbonate levels at day one of intervention minus bicarbonate levels at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum partial pressure of carbon dioxide at day one of intervention minus serum partial pressure of carbon dioxide at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Time frame: 96 hours after intervention started
Calculated as serum lactate levels at day one of intervention minus serum lactate levels at 96 hrs after intervention started.
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
Other
The Effect in Renal Function on Patients With Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome Treated With Two Strategies of Furosemide. A Randomized Controled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06588088
Cardio-Renal Syndrome, Cardiorenal Syndrome
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04145635
Cardio-Renal Syndrome, Cardiorenal Syndrome
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03753607
Acute Kidney Injury, Cardio-Renal Syndrome
Giessen, Hesse, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04227977
Cardio-Renal Syndrome, Cardiorenal Syndrome
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial Details