Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)-based titration algorithm implemented in DiAs
DeviceA Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)-based once weekly titration algorithm of basal insulin as implemented in DiAs Cloud platform
Other names: Degludec
NCT Number: NCT06111508
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) based titration algorithm to standard titration by self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) in participants with Type 2 Diabetes already using long acting insulin. The comparison aims to study the difference in glycemic control between the two therapies. Participants will be followed for 18 weeks and will be provided with Degludec insulin, insulin pen, and a CGM (Dexcom G6).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
This is an 18-week study designed to investigate the effect of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) based titration algorithm versus a standard titration by self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) on glycemic control in Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) participants using insulin Degludec. After 2 weeks of blinded CGM baseline observation, participants are randomized 2:1 to CGM-based titration or standard titration by SMBG for 16 weeks. In the SMBG group, all titrated doses will be reviewed by a study physician prior to use and participants will wear a blinded CGM during the whole study. After completion of the 16-week titration, participants are followed up for 2 days. Participants will be divided related to use of sulfonylureas or glinides with a maximum cap of nine participants being treated with sulfonylureas and glinides to complete the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)-based once weekly titration algorithm of basal insulin as implemented in DiAs Cloud platform
Other names: Degludec
Time frame: From baseline (-2 to 0 weeks) to weeks 14-16 (2 weeks)
Change in CGM-measured time in range (TIR) 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) from baseline to weeks 14-16, compared between control and experimental arm. change in TIR = TIR (weeks 14-16) - TIR (baseline). Change in TIR is measured with percentage points as TIR is measured with the percentage time spent within the range 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL).
Time frame: From week 0 to week 16
Percent change in HbA1c measured as percentage
Time frame: From baseline (week -2-0) to week 14-16
Percent change in time in tight range (TITR) 3.9-7.8 mmol/L (70-140 mg/dL) from baseline to weeks 14-16, compared between control and experimental arm. change in TITR = TITR (weeks 14-16) - TITR (baseline).
Time frame: From baseline (week -2-0) to week 14-16
Percent of time spent above 10.0 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) from baseline to weeks 14-16, compared between control and experimental arm. change in TAR = TAR (weeks 14-16) - TAR (baseline).
Time frame: From baseline (week -2-0) to week 14-16
Percent of time spent above (TAR2) 13.9 mmol/L (250 mg/dL) from baseline to weeks 14-16, compared between control and experimental arm. change in TAR2 = TAR2 (weeks 14-16) - TAR2 (baseline).
Time frame: From baseline (week -2-0) to week 14-16
The average CGM-measured blood glucose level (mg/dL).
Time frame: From baseline (week -2-0) to week 14-16
The statistical measure (%) of the relative dispersion of data points in a data series around the average CGM-measured blood glucose level.
Time frame: From baseline (week -2-0) to week 14-16
Percent of time spent below (TBR) 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) from baseline to weeks 14-16, compared between control and experimental arm. change in TBR = TBR (weeks 14-16) - TBR (baseline).
Time frame: From baseline (week -2-0) to week 14-16
Percent of time spent below (TBR2) 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) from baseline to weeks 14-16, compared between control and experimental arm. change in TBR2 = TBR2 (weeks 14-16) - TBR2 (baseline).
Time frame: From week 0 to week 16
The investigator changes the dose from baseline to week 16
Time frame: From week 0 to week 16
Investigator acceptance rate of weekly dose guidance from Experimental arm only. Measure is calculated for each participant as 100x(number of accepted doses)/(number of recommended doses). Median and IQR is reported.
University of Virginia
Other
An Exploratory 16-Week Pilot Study of the Effect and Safety of a Novel CGM-Based Titration Algorithm for Basal Insulin, With or Without Non-Insulin Antidiabetic Drugs, in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Participants Treated With Basal Insulin.
Acronym: CGM-DTx
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06649344
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07732218
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT05351359
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Prague, Czechia
View Trial Details