University of South Carolina
Columbia, South Carolina, 29208, United States
NCT Number: NCT04981847
The goal of this project is to use a two-stepped study to examine both the adoption of the three dietary patterns as presented by the United States Dietary Guidelines (USDG) and testing of a refined, culturally tailored one-year intervention examining the three diet patterns. For this study, African American adult participants with overweight/obesity and ≥three type 2 diabetes (T2DM) risk factors will be recruited to participate in this two-step study. This present study is for our Step 1: formative pilot work to culturally-tailor a dietary intervention of the three healthy eating patterns presented by the USDG for 12 weeks: 1) U.S.-Style, 2) Mediterranean, or 3) Vegetarian.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Columbia, South Carolina, 29208, United States
The U.S. Dietary Guidelines (USDG) form the basis of federal nutrition programs and policy and provide valuable guidance to health initiatives and industries. The updated 2015 USDG moved away from a focus on individual nutrients to a greater focus on dietary patterns. The USDG state that healthy eating goals can be met through a variety of dietary patterns, but present healthy diet in three main ways: 1) Healthy U.S.-Style Eating Pattern, 2) Healthy Mediterranean-Style Eating Pattern, and 3) Healthy Vegetarian Eating Pattern. Currently, US adults are falling short of the nutrition recommendations (fruit/vegetable intake, greens/beans, whole grains, etc.) set forth by the USDG and measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI). While the USDG are the basis of nutrition guidelines, the research informing these dietary pattern recommendations has largely been drawn from observational studies among mostly white populations. In addition, there has been very limited cultural tailoring of these dietary patterns that would ensure that these diets are acceptable to diverse populations, in particular, African Americans (AAs) living in the south, who experience a disproportionate burden of chronic disease, especially type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Currently, US adults are not meeting nutrition recommendations (fruit/vegetable, whole grains, etc.) set forth by the USDG and measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI).
For the present study, AA adult participants with overweight/obesity and ≥three T2DM risk factors will be recruited to participate in the following aims:
Aim 1: Conduct a 3-month randomized trial among AAs comparing adoption of the 3 dietary patterns [1) US, 2) Med, or 3) Veg] using existing materials from the USDG and examine differences in diet quality (HEI) and T2DM risk factors (weight, HgbA1c).
Aim 2: Drawing on participants' experiences in Aim 1, conduct qualitative work to refine and culturally tailor the dietary pattern intervention for an AA audience.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
o Women who are pregnant should not be pursuing weight loss and should be under the direct care of a physician. Therefore women who are pregnant or who are anticipating they might be pregnant should not participate in this study. If a woman becomes pregnant during the study, she will be advised to consult with her healthcare provider and will be dropped from the weight loss study.
Participants will attend classes once per week for 3 months.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of the intervention at 3 months
Change in Healthy Eating Index (HEI) total score was calculated as 3-month follow-up score minus baseline score. HEI total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better diet quality and greater adherence to dietary guidelines. The change score could potentially range from -100 to +100. Positive change scores indicate improvement in diet quality, whereas negative change scores indicate worsening diet quality. HEI total scores were calculated from three averaged 24-hour dietary recalls collected at each time point using the National Cancer Institute's Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Recall (ASA24).
Time frame: From baseline to the end of the intervention at 3 months
Change in body weight from baseline to the end of the intervention at 3 months
Time frame: From baseline to the end of the intervention at 3 months
Change in HgbA1c from baseline to the end of the intervention at 3 months
Time frame: From baseline to the end of the intervention at 3 months
Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to the end of the intervention at 3 months
Time frame: From baseline to the end of the intervention at 3 months
Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to the end of the intervention at 3 months
University of South Carolina
Other
Ensuring the Cultural Relevance of Dietary Guidelines Diet Patterns Among African Americans: Increasing Dietary Quality and Reducing Type 2 Diabetes Risk
Acronym: DG3D
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06649344
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07732218
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT05351359
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Prague, Czechia
View Trial Details