Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00123981

The Danish On-pump, Off-pump Randomization Study (DOORS)

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be performed either with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to obtain myocardial re-vascularisation. The investigators hypothesize that CABG without the use of CPB may reduce the risk of perioperative death, stroke, myocardial infarction and other serious complications.

The aim of the present study is to compare the incidence of complications and the clinical efficacy of CABG with and without the use of CPB in elderly patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

70 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dept. of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, 8200, Denmark

About this study

Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CCABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass has for decades been applied to obtain myocardial re-vascularisation and, hence, improved quality of life and survival. It does, however, bear a risk of death, stroke, myocardial infarction and other serious complications.

During recent years, an equivalent operation performed on the beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, OPCAB) has gained popularity helped by the advent of mechanical stabilization devices and improved surgical techniques. Observational studies suggest that this technique is associated with a lower incidence of stroke, per operative arrhythmias and even mortality than conventional CCABG. This is especially the case in elderly patients and patients with significant co-morbidity.

Only few randomised, controlled trials have been conducted and most of these included mainly or only low-risk, relatively young patients. These studies have documented the safety and efficacy of OPCAB compared with CCABG, but none of the trials has had the statistical strength to determine whether the rate of serious complications is lower after OPCAB operations. One recent study found graft patency to be significantly lower after OPCAB than after CCABG operations.

The investigators find that there is a need of a larger scale randomised trial to compare the results of CCABG and OPCAB operations, especially in elderly patients. This patient group is poorly represented in earlier randomised trials, whereas observational studies and theoretical considerations imply that they may benefit the most from avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.

Aims: Primarily, to compare the incidence of death, stroke and myocardial infarction after CCABG and OPCAB procedures in a population of elderly patients. Furthermore, to compare quality of life and graft patency, and cost- effectiveness after CCABG and OPCAB.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age seventy years or above
  • Admitted for first time coronary artery bypass operation

Exclusion criteria

  • Given information cannot be understood
  • Aortic crossclamping not safe due to calcification
  • Preoperative cardiac conditions demanding cardiopulmonary bypass
  • Re-do cardiac surgery
  • Patients requiring operation within the same day after conference

Treatment and study plan

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. A combined endpoint of death + stroke + myocardial infarction within 30 days from operation

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. A combined endpoint of death + stroke + myocardial infarction during follow-up

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Patency of bypass grafts assessed by coronary angiography 6 months after the operation

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Total mortality and cardiac mortality during follow-up

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Need of new intervention for cardiac angina during follow-up

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Quality of life assessed by MOS SF-36 and EuroQol questionnaires 6 months and 3 years after the operation

    Time frame: 6 months and 3 years

  6. Total hospital costs and costs of public care provided 6 months and 3 years after the operation and difference in costs per quality adjusted life year

    Time frame: 6 months and 3 years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kim Houlind

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Impact of Avoiding Cardiopulmonary By-pass During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Ischemic Heart Disease in Elderly Patients: The Danish On-pump, Off-pump Randomization Study (DOORS)

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2011
First posted
Jul 26, 2005
Registry last updated
Nov 6, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.