Dept. of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT00123981
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be performed either with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to obtain myocardial re-vascularisation. The investigators hypothesize that CABG without the use of CPB may reduce the risk of perioperative death, stroke, myocardial infarction and other serious complications.
The aim of the present study is to compare the incidence of complications and the clinical efficacy of CABG with and without the use of CPB in elderly patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me70 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CCABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass has for decades been applied to obtain myocardial re-vascularisation and, hence, improved quality of life and survival. It does, however, bear a risk of death, stroke, myocardial infarction and other serious complications.
During recent years, an equivalent operation performed on the beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, OPCAB) has gained popularity helped by the advent of mechanical stabilization devices and improved surgical techniques. Observational studies suggest that this technique is associated with a lower incidence of stroke, per operative arrhythmias and even mortality than conventional CCABG. This is especially the case in elderly patients and patients with significant co-morbidity.
Only few randomised, controlled trials have been conducted and most of these included mainly or only low-risk, relatively young patients. These studies have documented the safety and efficacy of OPCAB compared with CCABG, but none of the trials has had the statistical strength to determine whether the rate of serious complications is lower after OPCAB operations. One recent study found graft patency to be significantly lower after OPCAB than after CCABG operations.
The investigators find that there is a need of a larger scale randomised trial to compare the results of CCABG and OPCAB operations, especially in elderly patients. This patient group is poorly represented in earlier randomised trials, whereas observational studies and theoretical considerations imply that they may benefit the most from avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.
Aims: Primarily, to compare the incidence of death, stroke and myocardial infarction after CCABG and OPCAB procedures in a population of elderly patients. Furthermore, to compare quality of life and graft patency, and cost- effectiveness after CCABG and OPCAB.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 3 years
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 3 years
Time frame: 3 years
Time frame: 6 months and 3 years
Time frame: 6 months and 3 years
Kim Houlind
Other
The Impact of Avoiding Cardiopulmonary By-pass During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Ischemic Heart Disease in Elderly Patients: The Danish On-pump, Off-pump Randomization Study (DOORS)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05226416
Anemia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT02354040
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Karachi, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT00041938
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details