Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03668236

The Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care Trial

The purpose of this trial is to assess patient important benefits and harms of IV fluid restriction vs. standard care fluid therapy in patients with septic shock.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Brussels, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

BACKGROUND:

Septic shock is common, often lethal, costly, and associated with prolonged suffering among survivors and relatives. Traditionally, intravenous (IV) fluids are used to optimise the circulation, and the use of higher volumes is recommended by international guidelines. There is, however, no high-quality evidence to support this. In contrast, data from cohort studies, small trials and systematic reviews in sepsis and large trials in other settings and patient groups suggest potential benefits from restriction of IV fluids in patients with septic shock.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of the CLASSIC trial is to assess the benefits and harms of IV fluid restriction vs. standard care on patient-important outcome measures in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock.

DESIGN:

CLASSIC is an international, multicentre, parallel-grouped, open-labelled, centrally randomised, stratified, outcome assessor- and analyst-blinded trial.

POPULATION:

Adult ICU patients who have septic shock and have received at least 1 L of IV fluid in the last 24-hours.

EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTION:

In the IV fluid restriction group no IV fluids should be given in the ICU unless extenuating circumstances occur, including signs of severe hypoperfusion, overt fluid loss or a failing GI tract with a total fluid input of less than 1 L per day. In these circumstances, IV fluid may be given in measured amounts.

CONTROL INTERVENTION:

In the standard care group there will be no upper limit for the use of IV fluids.

OUTCOMES:

The primary outcome is 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes are serious adverse events in the ICU (ischemic events or severe acute kidney injury); serious adverse reactions in the ICU; days alive without life support at day 90; days alive and out of hospital at day 90 and mortality, health-related quality of life and cognitive function at 1-year.

TRIAL SIZE:

A total of 1554 participants will be randomised to allow the detection of a 15% relative risk reduction (7% absolute) in the restrictive vs. standard care group in 90-day mortality with a power of 80%.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

All the following criteria must be fulfilled:

  • Aged 18 years or above
  • Admitted to the ICU or plan to be admitted to the ICU regardless of trial participation
  • Septic shock defined according to the Sepsis-3 criteria:
  • Suspected or confirmed site of infection or positive blood culture AND
  • Ongoing infusion of vasopressor/inotrope agent to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 65 mmHg or above AND
  • Lactate of 2 mmol/L or above in any plasma sample performed within the last 3-hours
  • Have received at least 1 L of IV fluid (crystalloids, colloids or blood products) in the last 24-hours prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who fulfil any of the following criteria will be excluded:

  • Septic shock for more than 12 hours at the time of screening as these patients are no longer early in their course
  • Life-threatening bleeding as these patients need specific fluid/blood product strategies
  • Acute burn injury of more than 10% of the body surface area as these patients need a specific fluid strategy
  • Known pregnancy
  • Consent not obtainable as per the model approved for the specific site

Treatment and study plan

Isotonic crystalloids

Drug

Types of fluid to be used in both intervention groups:

  • IV fluids given for circulatory impairment: Only isotonic crystalloids are to be used as per the Scandinavian guideline for fluid resuscitation
  • Fluids given to substitute overt loss: Isotonic crystalloids are to be used. If large amounts of ascites are tapped, then human albumin may be used
  • Fluids used for dehydration: Water or isotonic glucose should be used
  • Fluids used for electrolyte disturbances: Fluids should be chosen to substitute the specific deficiency, including water in the case of severe hypernatremia
  • Blood products are only to be used on specific indications including severe bleeding, severe anaemia and prophylactic in case of severe coagulopathy

Primary outcomes

  1. 90-day Mortality

    Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation

    Al cause mortality at 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the ICU

    Time frame: Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days

    SAEs were defined as ischaemic events (cerebral, cardiac, intestinal or limb ischaemia) or as a new episode of severe acute kidney injury (modified KDIGO-3)

  2. Number of Participants With One or More Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs) to IV Crystalloids in the ICU.

    Time frame: Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days

    The pre-specified SARs to IV crystalloids were: Generalized tonic-clonic seizures, anaphylactic reactions, central pontine myelinolysis, severe hypernatremia, severe hyperchloremic acidosis, and severe metabolic alkalosis. Data on the outcome measures, including SARs, were obtained from patient medical records by the trial investigators or their delegates.

  3. Days Alive at Day 90 Without Life Support (Vasopressor / Inotropic Support, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Renal Replacement Therapy)

    Time frame: Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days

  4. Days Alive and Out of Hospital at Day 90

    Time frame: Day 90 after randomisation

  5. All-cause Mortality at 1-year After Randomisation

    Time frame: 1-year after randomisation

  6. Health-related Quality of Life 1 Year After Randomisation

    Time frame: 1 year after randomisation

    Measured using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (comprising 5 questions with a score from 1 to 5 each and a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100). Participants who have died will be assigned the lowest possible scores.

  7. Cognitive Function 1-year After Randomisation

    Time frame: 1-year after randomisation

    Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) MINI score validated for telephone use. Mini MoCA consists of 4 cognitive dimensions: attention (immediate recall of 5 words), executive functions and language (1-min verbal fluency), orientation (6 items on date and geographic orientation), and memory (delayed recall and recognition of 5 previously learned words). The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with lower values indicating worse cognitive function. To correct for any educational effect on the cognitive test, 1 point is added for participants with 12 years of education or less (scores were truncated at the maximum upper value of 30 points) Participants who had died were assigned the value 0.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Anders Perner, MD, PhD

Other

Collaborators

  • Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC)
  • Rigshospitalet, Denmark
  • Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group

Registry information

Acronym: CLASSIC

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Sep 12, 2018
Registry last updated
Feb 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.