Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07363174

The Clinical Role of Anogenital Distance

Aims:

To evaluate the predictive value of anogenital distance (AGD) measurements, including the anus-to-clitoris distance (AGDAC) and genital hiatus (GH), on the success of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods:

This cross-sectional, case-control study included 150 adult women with clinically confirmed stress urinary incontinence who completed a three-month PFMT program. All patients' demographic data were recorded, and the anogenital distance (AGDAC, AGDAF) and genital hiatus (GH) were measured using a digital caliper in the lithotomy position. All participants performed supervised Kegel exercises three times daily with monthly follow-up to ensure proper technique and compliance. Patients were then classified as responders or non-responders based on clinical improvement. Associations between PFMT outcomes and AGD parameters, BMI, parity, and other demographic factors were analyzed. All patients will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) before and after treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Biruni University Hospital

Istanbul, 34295, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Clinical and demographic data, including age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and number of births, were recorded for all patients at baseline.

All anogenital distance (AGD) parameters were measured with participants in the lithotomy position, with the legs positioned at approximately 45°, during the Valsalva maneuver. Measurements were conducted in accordance with standardized protocols to ensure accuracy and reproducibility (6). A stainless-steel digital caliper (VWR® International, LLC, West Chester, PA, USA) was used for all assessments. After each use, the caliper was cleaned with soapy water and disinfected with a 2% alcohol-based chlorhexidine solution.

Two AGD parameters were recorded: the distance from the anus to the clitoris (AGDAC) and the distance from the anus to the posterior fourchette (AGDAF). In addition, the genital hiatus (GH) was measured from the center of the urethral meatus to the posterior hymenal rim or the perineal midline. To minimize measurement error, all evaluations were performed by the same experienced gynecologist on three separate occasions, and the mean value was used as the final estimate. All patients will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) before and after treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years and older with confirmed SUI diagnosis who agreed to participate in a 12 weeks pelvic floor rehabilitation program were included in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • (1) Current pregnancy, (2) history of urinary tract or kidney infection within the last four weeks, (3) diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, (4) previous surgical intervention due to urinary incontinence, (5) known psychiatric disorders, (6) neuromuscular disease, (7) presence of genitourinary fistula, (8) active urogenital malignancy, (9) permanent urinary catheter use, (10) failure to comply with the prescribed exercise program or (11) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) Stage 2 (including asymptomatic cases) and above.

Treatment and study plan

Anogenital Distance Measurements

Other

All anogenital distance (AGD) parameters were measured with participants in the lithotomy position, with the legs positioned at approximately 45°, during the Valsalva maneuver. Measurements were conducted in accordance with standardized protocols to ensure accuracy and reproducibility (6). A stainless-steel digital caliper (VWR® International, LLC, West Chester, PA, USA) was used for all assessments. After each use, the caliper was cleaned with soapy water and disinfected with a 2% alcohol-based chlorhexidine solution.

Two AGD parameters were recorded: the distance from the anus to the clitoris (AGDAC) and the distance from the anus to the posterior fourchette (AGDAF). In addition, the genital hiatus (GH) was measured from the center of the urethral meatus to the posterior hymenal rim or the perineal midline. To minimize measurement error, all evaluations were performed by the same experienced gynecologist on three separate occasions, and the mean value was used as the final estimate.

pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises

Other

Following AGD assessment, all patients underwent a standardized pelvic floor muscle training program. Kegel exercises were instructed and supervised by physiatrists with more than ten years of clinical experience in pelvic rehabilitation.

Before initiating the exercise program, it was essential to confirm that patients could correctly identify and contract their pelvic floor muscles. To achieve this, patients were instructed in Kegel exercises over five consecutive days, performing three sets per day, each set consisting of 8-12 contractions with each contraction lasting 8-10 seconds. Following this initial training, patients were advised to perform the exercises three times daily for a period of three months.

During monthly outpatient follow-up visits, adherence to the exercise regimen was assessed, and the correctness of the performed exercises was verified. Patients who were unable to perform the exercises correctly received additional instruction.

Pelvic floor strengthening exercis

Primary outcomes

  1. anogenital distance (AGD) parameters

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Two AGD parameters were recorded: the distance from the anus to the clitoris (AGDAC) and the distance from the anus to the posterior fourchette (AGDAF). In addition, the genital hiatus (GH) was measured from the center of the urethral meatus to the posterior hymenal rim or the perineal midline. To minimize measurement error, all evaluations were performed by the same experienced gynecologist on three separate occasions, and the mean value was used as the final estimate.

  2. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)

    Time frame: 1-2 minutes

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure used to assess the severity and impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. It consists of four items evaluating the frequency of urinary leakage, the amount of urine lost, and the extent to which incontinence affects daily activities, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 derived from the first three items, while the fourth item identifies situations in which leakage occurs and aids in incontinence subtype classification but is not included in the total score. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity, and the questionnaire is sensitive to clinical change, with a reduction of 3-4 points considered clinically meaningful and a score of 0 often defined as complete cure. The ICIQ-UI SF is recommended by the International Continence Society, has been translated and validated in multiple languages including Turkish, and is w

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cigdem Cinar

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Clinical Role of Anogenital Distance in Predicting Pelvic Floor Training Outcomes for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Acronym: AGD

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 23, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 23, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.