Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00226291

The Clinical Informationist: Does the Model Work

This study is investigating the effects of an established clinical informationist program (evidence-based practice support service in which information professionals with significant clinical knowledge bases and advanced information seeking and appraisal skills) on clinical decision making at selected critical care units at Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

About this study

Background To evaluate the role of the Clinical Informatics Consult Service(CICS), an informationist service at the Eskind Biomedical Library (EBL) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC, in clinical decision-making, the EBL has been awarded a 3-year grant from the National Library of Medicine (5 R01 LM07849-02). The CICS is a well-established program that facilitates evidence-based practice by delivering targeted information in answer to complex, patient-specific questions. The CICS places librarians with specialized training in medical subject areas and in information retrieval ("clinical informationists") on clinical teams in intensive care settings. Acting as expert consultants, they analyze the biomedical literature to identify, filter, and present the best examples of each clinical viewpoint expressed about key problems.

Evaluation Project Working in cooperation with the Center for Evaluation and Program Improvement (CEPI) at Peabody College of Vanderbilt, the investigators will evaluate formally the role of CICS in clinical decision-making and evidence-seeking behavior. While past studies have evaluated clinical medical librarians' roles, few if any studies have examined the effectiveness and utility of the new clinical informationist approach in sites where informationists are well-established.

The project will also create reusable evaluation tools transferable across environments. Through a combination of observation and interviews, investigators will examine librarian involvement in three existing Vanderbilt CICS intensive care units. The project will collect detailed information about the ways in which clinicians incorporate CICS-provided information into their workflows. Next, investigators will conduct a randomized trial to evaluate the effect of CICS on decision-making. Investigators will compare clinicians' intended course of care vs. actual care when CICS results are provided and when clinicians seek information themselves.

Finally, "virtual cases" developed from actual patient CICS-related scenarios in each clinical unit will be incorporated into training tools that can be used to export elements of the CICS model to other locations. Demonstration of the utility of the clinical informationist approach can foster widespread adoption nationally, and increase the degree to which clinical practice becomes evidence-based.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Evidence-based questions requested by clinician on current service as an attending, resident, fellow, or nurse practitioner on one of the units included in the study

Exclusion criteria

All others

Treatment and study plan

Synthesized evidence report

Other

Each consultation response included a documented bibliographic search strategy with corresponding references, a targeted list of full-text articles, and a written synthesis and critique of the relevant research materials.

Other names: Literature summary, Evidence report

Primary outcomes

  1. Immediate and potential future clinical decisions

    Time frame: 3 days post-consult

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical action index

    Time frame: 3 days post-consult

  2. Number of research articles read

    Time frame: 3 days post-consult

  3. Satisfaction

    Time frame: 3 days post-consult

  4. Colleague consults

    Time frame: 3 days post-consult

  5. Time spent searching the literature

    Time frame: 3 days post-consult

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2007
First posted
Sep 26, 2005
Registry last updated
May 28, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.