Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01178554

The Clinic Treatment Project

The Clinic Treatment Project tested two alternative methods of delivering evidence-based practices within public community-based mental health clinics, using training and supervision procedures designed for the settings and users.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

7 year–13 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The Clinic Treatment Project focused on ethnically diverse youths aged 7-13 who were referred to community-based mental health clinics for problems involving disruptive behaviors, depression, anxiety, and any combination of these. Using a randomized block design, therapists were randomly assigned to deliver usual treatment procedures (usual care, or UC) in their clinics or evidence-based practices deployed in two forms: (a) standard manual treatment (SMT), using full treatment manuals, one at a time, exactly as they have been tested in clinical trials, and (b) modular manual treatment (MMT) in which therapists learn the component practices of the standard manuals but individualize the use of the components for each child using a guiding clinical algorithm. Unlike the SMT approach, the MMT approach allows the duration and sequencing of techniques to be individualized in an effort to fit the child's needs and allows the clinician to draw techniques from outside the target disorder domain when needed (e.g., to address noncompliance during the course of treating depression). Both SMT and MMT were supported by training and supervision procedures designed to fit providers and their clinic contexts. Assessments were carried out at pre-treatment, at post-treatment, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups. Assessments carried out at pre-treatment included(a) individual youth problems and disorders; (b) individual youth functioning at home and school; and (c) clinic staff beliefs and attitudes toward their work and workplace. Assessments carried out at post-treatment and follow-up only included measures of (a) youth, parent, and therapist satisfaction with treatment; (b) youth, parent and therapist views on the quality of the therapeutic relationship; and (c) treatment costs. Assessments carried out at follow-up only included (a) parent reports of any mental health service use following project treatment, and (b) therapist reports on the extent to which the treatment procedures they used in the project are continued after project termination. Analyses will address critical questions about deployment of evidence-based youth practices to clinical care settings.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 7 - 13 year olds and their parents
  • seeking services at community mental health clinics
  • primary problem or disorder related to anxiety, depression, or conduct problems

Exclusion criteria

  • Child is younger than 7 years, 9 months or older than 13 on the day of the phone screen.
  • Child has attempted suicide within the past year.
  • Schizophrenic spectrum diagnosis (including MDD w/ psychotic features)
  • Autism or another Pervasive Developmental Disorder (e.g., PDD NOS, Asperger's Disorder, Child Disintegrative Disorder, Rett's Disorder).
  • Anorexia Nervosa
  • Bulimia Nervosa
  • Mental Retardation
  • No relevant T-scores validate target disorders.
  • ADHD identified as primary reason for seeking treatment at phone screen
  • Child's sibling already included
  • Child's medication has not been regulated for one month or longer

Treatment and study plan

Psychotherapy

Behavioral

Usual Care therapists could use any treatment procedures they used regularly in their clinical practice.

Other names: Treatment As Usual (TAU), Case Management

evidence-based treatment

Behavioral

Evidence-based treatment manuals were used for anxiety (Coping Cat Manual; Kendall, 1994; Kendall et al., 1994 ), depression (Primary and Secondary Control Enhancement Training; Weisz et al., 1997, 1998), and conduct problems (Defiant Children Manual; Barkley, 1997).

Other names: best practices, evidence-based practices, treatment manuals

modular evidence-based treatment

Behavioral

Therapists used the Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, or Conduct Problems (MATCH-ADC; Chorpita & Weisz, 2004)

Other names: modular treatments, best practices, evidence-based practices

Primary outcomes

  1. Brief Problem Checklist (BPC, parent and child forms)

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 267

    Youth and parents were contacted weekly to report changes in youth functioning. Each person was asked to rate their own or their child's behavior on 12 items (6 internalizing and 6 externalizing behaviors) that were adapted from the Youth Self Report and the Child Behavior Checklist. Children and caregivers completed the pre-treatment assessment on Day 1, every week during treatment, and at post-treatment assessment which occurred on average 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes-Child and Parent Forms (ChIPS/P-ChIPS)

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 267

    The ChIPS/P-ChIPS are structured psychiatric interviews designed to assess psychopathology according to DSM-IV criteria in children and adolescents ages 6-18 years. ChIPS/P-ChIPS assess twenty behavioral, anxiety, mood, and other syndromes as well as psychosocial stressors the child might have experienced. Symptoms are assessed using a "yes/no" question format. Onset, offset and duration data are gathered for each disorder. On average, youth and caregivers completed the post-treatment assessment 267 days (SD=124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment.(Used as a measure of clinical outcome.)

  2. Top Problems Assessment

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 712 (24-mo follow-up)

    Youths and parents were asked to identify "The three most important problems for which you need [or "your child needs"] help." at the intake assessment. The six resulting problems (3 from youth, 3 from parent) were then rated on a scale of 0 ("Not serious at all") to 10 ("Very serious problem") by youth and parent. Youths and parents completed the pre-treatment assessment on Day 1, at post-treatment assessment which occurred on average 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-month follow-up from Day 1. (Used as a measure of clinical outcome.)

  3. Youth Self-Report Form (YSR)

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 712 (24-mo follow-up)

    The YSR assesses problems in children on eight narrow-band scales (Withdrawn, Somatic Complaints, Anxious, Social Problems, Thought Problems, Attention Problems, Rule-Breaking Behavior, Aggressive Behavior), three broad-band scales (Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total problems), and six DSM-oriented scales. Children completed the pre-treatment assessment on Day 1, at post-treatment assessment which occurred on average 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-month follow-up from Day 1.(Used as a measure of clinical outcome.)

  4. Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 712 (24-mo follow-up)

    The CBCL assesses problems in children on eight narrow-band scales (Withdrawn, Somatic Complaints, Anxious, Social Problems, Thought Problems, Attention Problems, Rule-Breaking Behavior, Aggression), three broad-band scales (Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total problems), and six DSM-oriented scales. Caregivers completed the pre-treatment assessment on Day 1, at post-treatment assessment which occurred on average 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-month follow-up from Day 1. (Used as a measure of clinical outcome.)

  5. Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children

    Time frame: post-treatment (Day 267)

    The quality of youths' working alliance with their therapists was assessed via the Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children (TASC, Shirk & Saiz, 1992). The 7-item scale comes in both a youth-report form and a parent-report form (parents reporting on their youth's relationship with the therapist). On average, children and caregivers completed the post-treatment assessment 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment. (Available for supplemental analyses.)

  6. Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents: Treatment and Auxiliary Service Use Scales

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 712 (24-mo follow-up)

    The SACA (Horwitz et al., 2001)is a standardized interview for youths and parents that measures use of mental health services across a broad spectrum (including outpatient, inpatient, and school-based). SACA reliability and validity data are well-documented. Caregivers completed the pre-treatment assessment on Day 1, at post-treatment assessment which occurred on average 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment, and at 12- and 24-month follow-up from Day 1.(Available for supplemental analyses.)

  7. Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 267

    The RCADS is a 47-item child self-report measure that assesses symptoms of several DSM-IV anxiety and depressive disorders (i.e., separation anxiety disorder, social phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder). On average, children and caregivers completed the post-treatment assessment 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment.(Available for supplemental analyses.)

  8. Brief Symptom Inventory

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 267

    The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) is a parent self-report form that is the short form of the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised instrument. The BSI provides a screen for psychological problems. This inventory reports profiles of nine primary symptom dimensions and three global indices of distress (Derogatis, 1993). It can also be used to measuring patient progress during treatment or in the assessment of treatment outcomes. On average, caregivers completed the post-treatment assessment 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment. (Available for supplemental analyses.)

  9. Brief Impairment Scale

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 712 (24-mo follow-up)

    The BIS is a 23-item instrument that evaluates three domains of functioning: interpersonal relations, school/work functioning, and self-care/self-fulfillment. Its advantages over other global impairment instruments are that it is respondent based, short in administration time, and multidimensional. Caregivers completed the pre-treatment assessment on Day 1, at post-treatment assessment which occurred on average 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment, and at 12- and 24-month follow-up from Day 1.(Available for supplemental analyses.)

  10. Services for Children & Adolescents - Parent Interview (SCAPI)

    Time frame: Change over time from Day 1 to Day 712 (24-mo follow-up)

    The SCAPI is a measure that tracks child's use of medication as reported by the parent. Caregivers completed the pre-treatment assessment on Day 1, at post-treatment assessment which occurred on average 267 days (SD = 124 days) after the pre-treatment assessment, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-month follow-up from Day 1.(Available for supplemental analyses.)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Judge Baker Children's Center

Other

Collaborators

  • MacArthur Foundation
  • University of Hawaii
  • University of Illinois at Chicago

Registry information

Official study title

Child System and Treatment Enhancement Projects (Child STEPs); The Clinic Treatment Project - Phase II

Acronym: CTP

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2010
First posted
Aug 10, 2010
Registry last updated
Mar 16, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.