carvedilol MR
DrugStudy drug
Other names: Carvedilol controlled release or modified release
NCT Number: NCT00108082
This study is designed to compare the effects of COREG MR (carvedilol modified release formulation) to atenolol on indices of left ventricular dimensions when added to standardized angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, and to the effect of ACE inhibition alone. Subjects with LVH (left ventricular hypertrophy) and hypertension will be studied. The primary endpoint will be the change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) characterized by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following 12 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints include the change in LV (left ventricular) mass, LV wall thickness, diastolic left ventricular filling parameters, and left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiographic methods at Treatment Month 12. Composite outcomes and individual event data will also be evaluated by treatment group.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
GSK Investigational Site, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Effects of Carvedilol Modified Release Formulation (COREG MR) and Atenolol in Combination with and Compared to an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (Lisinopril) on Left Ventricular Mass Regression in Hypertensive Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Study drug
Other names: Carvedilol controlled release or modified release
Comparator
Comparator
Other names: carvedilol MR, atenolol
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF] analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)
LVMI was measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. A reduction in left ventricular mass, calculated as LVMI, of 5 g/m^2 was assumed to be clinically meaningful. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)
LVMIH was measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. LV mass depends on body size. One method of determining whether an individual has LV hypertrophy relates LV mass to height raised to a power of 2.7.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)
LV Mass was measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)
LVMI was measured by echogradiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was available)
LVMIH was measured by echogradiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)
LV Mass was measured by echocardiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)
LV filling parameters, LV E-Volume and LV A-Volume, were measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. These filling parameters represent the volumes of blood filling the ventricle during the passive filling phase (E-volume) and the active filling phase caused by atrial contraction (A-volume).
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)
LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction were measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. The ejection fraction is the fraction of the blood volume available at the end of diastole that is pumped out of the ventricules during systole.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)
LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction were measured by echocardiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)
Systolic and Diastolic BP were measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used
BNP concentration (picagram per milliter) was measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and was calculated as 100 x (exponent (mean change on log scale) -1) [Change is the Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value].
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used)
CRP concentration (milligrams per deciliter) was measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and calculated as 100 x (exponent (mean change on log scale) - 1). [Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.]
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used)
Plasma lipid concentrations (milligrams per deciliter) were measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and calculated as 100 x (exponent(mean change on log scale) - 1). [Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.]
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used)
Urinary ACR (micrograms per milligram) was determined at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and was calculated as 100 x (exponent (exponent (mean change on log scale) - 1. [Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.]
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Effects of Carvedilol Modified Release Formulation (COREG MR) and Atenolol in Combination With and Compared to an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (Lisinopril) on Left Ventricular Mass Regression in Hypertensive Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH).
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04862273
Amyloid Neuropathies, Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03749551
Cardiomegaly, Cardiomyopathies
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02599480
Cardiomegaly, Cardiovascular Diseases
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05713916
Cardiomegaly, Cardiomyopathies
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details