Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00108082

The CLEVER Study - Coreg And Left Ventricular Mass Regression

This study is designed to compare the effects of COREG MR (carvedilol modified release formulation) to atenolol on indices of left ventricular dimensions when added to standardized angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, and to the effect of ACE inhibition alone. Subjects with LVH (left ventricular hypertrophy) and hypertension will be studied. The primary endpoint will be the change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) characterized by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following 12 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints include the change in LV (left ventricular) mass, LV wall thickness, diastolic left ventricular filling parameters, and left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiographic methods at Treatment Month 12. Composite outcomes and individual event data will also be evaluated by treatment group.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

GSK Investigational Site, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Effects of Carvedilol Modified Release Formulation (COREG MR) and Atenolol in Combination with and Compared to an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (Lisinopril) on Left Ventricular Mass Regression in Hypertensive Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Stage 1 or Stage 2 hypertension.
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy.

Exclusion criteria

  • In atrial fibrillation.
  • Takes beta-blocker for MI (myocardial infarction) or arrhythmia.
  • Has uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrollable or symptomatic arrhythmias, unstable angina, second or third degree heart block, history of MI, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), liver or kidney disease.
  • Uses beta-2-agonists.
  • Unable to undergo MRI (magnetic resonance imaging).
  • Females of childbearing potential.

Treatment and study plan

carvedilol MR

Drug

Study drug

Other names: Carvedilol controlled release or modified release

Atenolol

Drug

Comparator

Lisinopril

Drug

Comparator

Other names: carvedilol MR, atenolol

Primary outcomes

  1. Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed (LVMI) by Body Surface Area as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF] analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

    LVMI was measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. A reduction in left ventricular mass, calculated as LVMI, of 5 g/m^2 was assumed to be clinically meaningful. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed by Height (LVMIH) as Measured by MRI at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

    LVMIH was measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. LV mass depends on body size. One method of determining whether an individual has LV hypertrophy relates LV mass to height raised to a power of 2.7.

  2. Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular (LV) Mass as Measured by MRI at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

    LV Mass was measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.

  3. Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed (LVMI) by Body Surface Area as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

    LVMI was measured by echogradiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.

  4. Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed by Height (LVMIH) as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was available)

    LVMIH was measured by echogradiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.

  5. Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in LV Mass as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

    LV Mass was measured by echocardiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in LV Filling Parameters as Measured by MRI at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

    LV filling parameters, LV E-Volume and LV A-Volume, were measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. These filling parameters represent the volumes of blood filling the ventricle during the passive filling phase (E-volume) and the active filling phase caused by atrial contraction (A-volume).

  7. Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction as Measured by MRI at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

    LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction were measured by MRI at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value. The ejection fraction is the fraction of the blood volume available at the end of diastole that is pumped out of the ventricules during systole.

  8. Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction as Measured by Echocardiography at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

    LV End Systolic and Diastolic Volumes and Ejection Fraction were measured by echocardiography at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.

  9. Model-adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF analysis, which includes data collected on or after Month 9 of treatment to Month 12 of treatment, was used)

    Systolic and Diastolic BP were measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.

  10. Model-adjusted Ratio to Baseline as Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used

    BNP concentration (picagram per milliter) was measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and was calculated as 100 x (exponent (mean change on log scale) -1) [Change is the Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value].

  11. Model-adjusted Ratio to Baseline as Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used)

    CRP concentration (milligrams per deciliter) was measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and calculated as 100 x (exponent (mean change on log scale) - 1). [Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.]

  12. Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Lipid Parameters at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used)

    Plasma lipid concentrations (milligrams per deciliter) were measured at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and calculated as 100 x (exponent(mean change on log scale) - 1). [Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.]

  13. Model-adjusted Ratio to Baseline as Percentage Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12 (If Month 12 data were not available, the LOCF was used)

    Urinary ACR (micrograms per milligram) was determined at Baseline and after 12 months of treatment/Month 12. Percentage change from Baseline was based on log transformed data and was calculated as 100 x (exponent (exponent (mean change on log scale) - 1. [Change in Baseline was calculated as Month 12 value (or value after 12 months of treatment) minus the Baseline value.]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Effects of Carvedilol Modified Release Formulation (COREG MR) and Atenolol in Combination With and Compared to an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (Lisinopril) on Left Ventricular Mass Regression in Hypertensive Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH).

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Apr 14, 2005
Registry last updated
Dec 16, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.