Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00187850

The CAP-2 Trial: Effect of Direct Pulp Capping Versus Partial Pulpotomy

CAP-2 Trial

Background: This trial is being done in conjunction with an ongoing clinical trial investigating stepwise excavation versus final excavation on deep caries lesions (The CAP-1 trial). The investigators lack systematic knowledge concerning the treatment of the exposed pulp and whether the capping of a pulp represents the same outcome as the partial removal of an additional 1-1.5 mm of the pulp tissue (partial pulpotomy).

Aim: The aim of the CAP-2 trial is in a randomised clinical trial to investigate the effect of direct pulp capping versus partial pulpotomy in patients who, from the beginning, have received either a final excavation or a stepwise excavation and where this intervention has led to the exposure of a vital pulp and/or the patient has not gained relief from tooth pain after excavation and placement of a temporary restoration.

Patients: Patients include consecutive patients with deep caries who have been participating in the CAP-1 trial, where the pulp exposure to a bleeding pulp is present and/or pain relief has not been obtained.

Design: The CAP-2 trial is a randomised patient- and observer-blinded multicenter trial, with two parallel intervention groups. Patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be centrally bloc-randomised in the Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen DK, and stratified by age and pain. The allocation ratio is 1:1.

The Interventions and Products: Patients are allocated for direct pulp capping or partial pulpotomy. The patients will not be informed about the results of the randomisation, i.e. the type of intervention. In both groups the patient receives a calcium hydroxide seal covering the exposure and a glass ionomer restoration. The final resin restoration is placed following 4 weeks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Copenhagen University

Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, 2200, Denmark

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Persons participating in the CAP-1 trial, who have received a pulp exposure due to treatment or due to absence of pain relief.

Exclusion criteria

  • The CAP-1-treated tooth has ongoing unbearable pain and/or disturbed night sleep.
  • Visible pus from the pulp.

Treatment and study plan

PP

Procedure

Partial pulpotomy

Other names: cvek´s pulpotomy

DPC

Procedure

Direct pulp capping

Primary outcomes

  1. The survival of the tooth with vital pulp and without apical radiolucency. The x-ray evaluation and the clinical sensibility test are carried out by a blinded observer.

    Time frame: 1 year after inclusion in the CAP-2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gain of pain relief

    Time frame: after 4 weeks

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Copenhagen

Other

Collaborators

  • Dan Dental A/S
  • Göteborg University
  • Huddinge Faculty,Stockholm,Sweden
  • Malmö Dental school,Sweden
  • National Health Insurance foundation
  • University of Aarhus
  • Uppsala FolkTandvård,Sweden

Registry information

Official study title

The CAP-2 Trial: Effect of Direct Pulp Capping Versus Partial Pulpotomy on CAP-1 Patients: A Randomised, Patient - and Observer-Blinded Multicenter Trial

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2013
First posted
Sep 16, 2005
Registry last updated
Oct 18, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.