Absorb
DeviceRandomization to implantation of Absorb BVS in bifurcation lesion
NCT Number: NCT02973529
Coronary artery disease is often treated by implantation of permanent metallic stents.Coronary stents are required in the early healing phase after balloon dilatation but constitute a lifelong foreign body. New bioresorbable stents have been developed and are believed to improve long-term safety. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and vessel healing after treatment of simple bifurcation lesions with the CE-marked bioresorbable stents Absorb and Desolve.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
BIFSORB is a prospective, randomized multicenter trial comparing 6-month healing outcome after treatment of simple coronary bifurcation lesions by Absorb or Desolve BRS. for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.
BRS are promising in treatment of coronary artery disease. The concept of bifurcation treatment using BRS is particular appealing as struts covering the side branch ostium may resorb over time.
The aim of this study is to compare the 6 months safety and vessel healing after treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions by the Desolve or Absorb BRS.
Hypothesis: Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions using Absorb and Desolve bioresorbable stents is safe. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions by Desolve BRS is associated with a lower index of adverse vessel wall features (main vessel area stenosis, acquired malapposition, evaginations, late recoil, single end attached protruding struts, side branch ostial area stenosis) at 6 months compared to treatment with Absorb BRS.
Methods:
Prospective, open label, single blind, randomized, feasibility and safety pilot study with inclusion of 120 patients. Randomization 1:1 to Absorb or Desolve. Planned 6- and 24-month follow-up by OCT and follow-up for clinical endpoints until 10 years.
Eligible patients with a bifurcation lesion are treated by the provisional technique with mandatory jailing of the side branch and provisional opening of side branch ostium by the mini-kiss technique in case of severe pinching or TIMI-flow less than III. Proximal post-dilatation is mandatory. No dilatation beyond the expansion limits of the BRS.
The patients are assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) before, during and after implantation of the Absorb or Desolve BRS at baseline procedure and again at 6- and 24-month follow-up, or before if they are readmitted with a possible target lesion failure.
The operator is not blinded to pre-PCI OCT images that may be used for sizing and positioning of the scaffolds. Procedural OCT may be used to optimize scaffold implantation before performing final OCT.
Results are reported as clinical safety at 6 months (myocardial infarction, revascularization, death) and stent healing index by OCT including malapposition, stent coverage, side branch ostial area late loss, fracture and evaginations.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Randomization to implantation of Absorb BVS in bifurcation lesion
Randomization to implantation of Desolve BRS in bifurcation lesion
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical safety measured as: major procedural myocardial infarction, non-procedural target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion failure, cardiac death.
Time frame: 6 months
Side branch ostial area late loss, strut fracture, uncovered non-side branch apposed stent struts, uncovered stent struts in front of side branch, uncovered stent struts on acquired or persistent malapposed struts, persistent malapposition, max neointimal thickness/area stenosis, cumulated extra stent lumen gain
Time frame: Baseline
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline
Measured in segments with; 1) calcified plaque, 2) lipid plaque, 3) area after predilatation < 30% of reference area, 4) stenosed segments (>50% area stenosis) with no dissections after predilatation
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Measured in segments with; 1) calcified plaque, 2) lipid plaque, 3) area after predilatation < 30% of reference area, 4) stenosed segments (>50% area stenosis) with no dissections after predilatation
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline
Time frame: 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline
From sheath insertion to closure device excluding treatment of other vessels
Time frame: Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Time frame: 10 years
Time frame: 10 years
Time frame: 10 years
Time frame: 10 years
Time frame: 10 years
Time frame: 10 years
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Other
Bioresorbable Vascular Stents for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography - The BIFSORB Study
Acronym: BIFSORB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05755711
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Loma Linda, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06885177
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04763200
Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04470934
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Jena, Thuringia, Germany
View Trial Details