Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01192100

The Beneficial Effects of a Protein-rich Breakfast on Appetite Control & Cognition in Overweight and Obese Adolescents

The purpose of this study is to assess whether the daily addition of a protein-rich breakfast leads to beneficial changes in appetite control, food intake regulation,and cognitive function in overweight & obese 'breakfast skipping' young women.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Overweight Behavior Body Weight Fasting Feeding Behavior Intermittent Fasting Nutrition Disorders Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases Obesity Overnutrition Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms

Age range

15 year–20 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Missouri

Columbia, Missouri, 65211, United States

About this study

Breakfast skipping, which is a common, yet unhealthy dietary habit among young women, has been strongly associated with over-eating (especially in the evening), weight gain, and obesity. Breakfast skipping has also been shown to reduce cognitive function in this population. However, it is unclear as to whether the addition of breakfast, with specific emphasis on increased dietary protein, leads to improvements in these outcomes. This study will provide mechanistic evidence supporting the addition of a protein-rich breakfast to improve and/or re-establish appetite control, energy intake regulation, and cognitive function in overweight/obese 'breakfast skipping' young women. 22 overweight and obese 'breakfast skipping' adolescent girls will participate in the following randomized within-subject crossover-design breakfast study. The participants will randomly complete the follow breakfast patterns at home for 6 days: 1) Breakfast Skipping; 2) Consumption of Normal Protein breakfast meals(i.e., 350 kcal; 15% of the meal as protein, 65% CHO, & 20% fat); and 3) Consumption of Protein-Rich breakfast meals (i.e., 350 kcal; 40% of the meal as protein, 40% CHO, & 20% fat). On the 7th day of each pattern, the participants will report to the MU-Brain Imaging Center in the morning to complete the respective 10-h testing day. The participants will begin the testing day by either skipping breakfast or consuming their respective breakfast meal. Blood samples and assessments of perceived appetite, pleasure/reward, and cognitive function will be collected/completed at specific times throughout the day. A standardized lunch will also be provided. Prior to dinner, a brain scan will be completed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify brain activation patterns in response to food pictures. Following the fMRI, the participants will be provided with an ad libitum dinner buffet to consume of the facility. They will also be given evening snacks to consume ad libitum, at home throughout the remainder of the day. There is a 7-day washout period between each breakfast pattern. Primary outcomes include morning, mid-day, afternoon, and evening appetite, satiety, pleasure/reward, hormonal responses (plasma glucose, insulin, ghrelin, and PYY concentrations), brain activation patterns, evening energy intake, and daily energy intake.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

The participants must meet the following inclusion criteria:

  • Female
  • Age range 15-20 y
  • Overweight to obese (85th -99th percentile for BMI for age; BMI: 25-39.9 kg/m2
  • No metabolic, psychological, or neurological diseases/conditions
  • Not currently/previously on a weight loss/other special diet
  • Frequently eats lunch ( ≥ 5 eating occasions/wk)
  • Consistently skips breakfast every week day (i.e., 5 week days/week)
  • Right-handed (necessary for the fMRI analyses)

Exclusion criteria

The participants will be excluded from participation in the study if they meet the following exclusion criteria:

  • Male
  • Age >20 y and <15 y
  • Under Weight (<5th percentile for BMI for age; BMI: <18 kg/m2)
  • Normal Weight (6th-84th percentile for BMI for age; BMI: 18-24.0 kg/m2)
  • Morbidly Obese (BMI: >40 kg/m2)
  • Clinically diagnosed with diabetes (Type I or Type II), having an eating disorder, or having any other metabolic, psychological, or neurological diseases/conditions that would influence the study outcomes.
  • Not currently/previously on a weight loss or other special diet (in the past 6 months)
  • Skip lunch ( ≥ 2 eating occasions/wk)
  • Consume breakfast (≥ 2 eating occasions/wk)
  • Left-handed
  • Claustrophobic (≥ 2 past bouts of claustrophobia when exposure to small spaces)
  • Do not meet the fMRI criteria established by the MU-BIC (regarding metal implants, etc.)
  • Pregnant

Treatment and study plan

Breakfast Skipping

Behavioral

Participants will continue to skip breakfast each morning.

Other names: Control

Normal Protein Breakfast Meals

Behavioral

Participants will consume normal protein breakfast meals each morning.

Protein-rich Breakfast Meals

Behavioral

Participants will consume protein-rich breakfast meals each morning.

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Curve (niAUC) of Perceived Hunger, Fullness, Desire to Eat, and Prospective Food Consumption

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    Computerized questionnaires, assessing perceived sensations of hunger and fullness were completed throughout the testing days beginning at baseline and about every 30 minutes for a total of 20 questionnaires (- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min). The questions are worded as "how strong is your feeling of" with anchors of "not at all" to "extremely." Each reported score can be a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100 mm. niAUC was calculated by computing the summation of the average change from baseline score (mm) for each time point and the subsequent time point, multiplied by the difference in time (min) between the two measures. For reported feelings of hunger, a higher score can be interpreted as "feeling more hungry" throughout the day. This can be applied to the three other perceived sensations.

  2. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Total Ghrelin and Ln Peptide YY (PYY)

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    The samples were collected in test tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Protease inhibitors (pefabloc SC and dipeptidyl peptidase) were added to some of the tubes to reduce protein degradation. The plasma was separated and stored in microcentrifuge tubes at -80°C for future analysis. Plasma total ghrelin and peptide YY (PYY) were measured for all time points using the Milliplex multi-analyte profiling magnetic bead-based multi-analyte, metabolic panel, 2-plex assay and Magpix Luminex technologies. AUC was calculated by computing the summation of the average change from baseline score (pg/ml) for each time point and the subsequent time point multiplied by the difference in time (min) between the two time instances for a total of 20 blood samples (- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min).

  3. Brain Regions Displaying Differential Activation Prior to Dinner in Response to Food vs Nonfood Stimuli From Food Cue-stimulate fMRI Brain Scans

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    Participants viewed 3 categories of pictures including food, nonfood (animals), and blurred baseline images. The pictures from each category were presented in blocks of images. Animal pictures were used to control for visual richness and general interest (i.e., appealing but not appetizing). To determine the effects of breakfast/no breakfast on neural activity associated with food motivation, repeated measures ANOVAs were performed on the brain activation maps within the Brain Voyager software with use of stimulus [food (i.e., appetizing and appealing) vs. nonfood (i.e., animal, nonappetizing but appealing]. To identify significant activations in a priori regions, a cluster level statistical threshold was applied to correct for multiple comparisons. By using this approach, significance was set at P = 0.01, with a cluster-level false-positive rate of a = 0.05

Secondary outcomes

  1. Daily Energy Intake

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    Energy intake during breakfast, lunch, dinner, and evening snacks of each testing day will be measured.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Missouri-Columbia

Other

Collaborators

  • American Egg Board
  • National Cattlemen's Beef Association, a contractor to the Beef Checkoff

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Aug 31, 2010
Registry last updated
Apr 3, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.