Lifestyle Modification to Improve Diet in Women With GDM
NCT03669887
Body Weight, Childhood Obesity
Shatin, Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT02036619
The General hypothesis is that the IADPSG screening strategy for gestational diabetes (GDM) will lead to an important increase in the work load and the prevalence of GDM in Belgium but that this might not be cost effective concerning the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The risk to develop type 2 diabetes postpartum will probably be lower than for women diagnosed with the two-step screening strategy.
In this prospective multicentric cohort study, women will be universally screened for pregestational diabetes and GDM at the first prenatal visit during the first trimester by measuring the fasting plasma glucose. In the second trimester, women without diagnosis of diabetes or GDM in the first trimester, will be universally screened for GDM using the 50g glucose challenge test (GCT) and the 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with the IADPSG criteria for GDM. Diagnosis of GDM will be based on the 75g OGTT.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
Female
Observational
OLV Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
Accurate data on the prevalence of gestational diabetes (GDM) are lacking in Belgium and the current practice for screening for GDM varies across different centers. The discrepancy in recommendations is due to the lack of data based on research in our population concerning the best screening strategy for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and the lack of data on the best screening strategy for GDM. A substantial number of centers in Belgium already use the IADPSG screening strategy although not always a an universal screening strategy or not always as an one-step screening strategy.
The General hypothesis is that the IADPSG screening strategy will lead to an important increase in the work load and the prevalence of GDM in Belgium but that this might not be cost effective concerning the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The risk to develop type 2 diabetes postpartum will probably be lower than for women diagnosed with the two-step screening strategy.
In this prospective cohort study, women will be universally screened for pregestational diabetes and GDM at the first prenatal visit during the first trimester by measuring the fasting plasma glucose. GDM will be defined as a fasting plasma glucose ≥100-125mg/dl. This will allow to identify the most important risk factors for the development of GDM.
In the second trimester, women will be universally screened for GDM using the 50g glucose challenge test (GCT) and the 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)with the IADPSG criteria for GDM. Compared to the IADPSG screening strategy used in normal routine, the 50g GCT will be an extra test specific for the study. Diagnosis of GDM will be based on the 75g OGTT. Participants and researchers will therefore be blinded for the result of the GCT. The results of the GCT test will be used at the end of the study for research purposes only. The use of a GCT as an universal screening tool in a two-step approach with the use of the 75g 2-hour OGTT with the IADPSG criteria only if the GCT is abnormal, is not yet validated and will be evaluated in the study, since this could be a practical solution. Differences in GDM prevalence and pregnancy outcomes will be analyzed using different diagnostic criteria based on the 75g OGTT: the Carpenter & Coustan criteria, the IADPSG criteria, and threshold values if diagnostic criteria would be based on an odds ratio of 2.0. The evaluation of different screening strategies and different diagnostic criteria will allow to explore the most cost effective methods for identifying women at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and at high risk for the development of type 2 diabetes after pregnancy. By using a multivariable risk estimation model based on the most relevant clinical risk factors and biochemical measures for GDM in our own population, the aim is to develop a simple and cost effective screening algorithm.
This study will also allow to evaluate the best short-term follow up strategy postpartum for women with a previous history of GDM. Different screening tests will be used three months postpartum: a fasting plasma glucose, Hba1c and 75g OGTT.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluation of the difference in GDM prevalence between the 2-step (50 glucose challenge test followed by a 75g OGTT) and 1-step IADPSG (directly 75g OGTT) screening strategy.
Time frame: 2.5 years
Time frame: 2 years
risk factors will be analyzed such as ethnicity, maternal age, maternal BMI, family history of diabetes, history of GDM, history of impaired glucose regulation and socio-economic factors
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluation of rate of diabetes and prediabetes 3 months postpartum in women with recent GDM.
Time frame: 2.5 years
evaluation according different diagnostic criteria used (IADPSG criteria, the Carpenter & Coustan criteria and with the diagnostic criteria based on an odds ratio of 2.0)
Time frame: 2.5 years
Evaluation of the value of the 50g glucose challenge test as a universal screening tool in a two-step approach with the use of the 75g 2-hour OGTT with the IADPSG criteria, with the use of the Carpenter & Coustan criteria and with the diagnostic criteria based on an odds ratio of 2.0
Time frame: 2 years
Prevalence of pregestational diabetes before 14 weeks of pregnancy
Time frame: 2.5 years
BMI, lipid profile, blood pressure, adiponectin, leptin and Hs-CRP
Time frame: 3 years
birth weight, length, head circumference, skinfold thickness and c-peptide on cord blood
Time frame: 3 years
Time frame: 2.5 years
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Other
Prospective and Multi-centric Study on Diabetes During Pregnancy in Belgium
Acronym: BEDIP-N
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03669887
Body Weight, Childhood Obesity
Shatin, Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT03215173
Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03165643
Birth Weight, Body Weight
View Trial DetailsNCT00065130
Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus
Santa Barbara, California, United States
View Trial Details