University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48170, United States
NCT Number: NCT04870957
This study is being completed to better understand who benefits from different chronic pain treatments and how these treatments work.
This study will include a four week run-in period for all cLBP participants. After completing the PainGuide (online or smart phone accessible website) run-in period, participants will be assessed using either the light or light plus deep phenotyping assessment battery and those who minimal or modest improvement in their pain (based on PGIC) will be randomized to one of four 8-week treatments (mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), physical therapy (PT) and exercise, acupressure self-management, or duloxetine).
In addition, participants will complete study visits including physical exams, complete surveys, provide samples (blood,saliva, etc.), wear an electronic wrist device at certain times, and have Magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) during the study.
Following one of the 4 treatments (8 weeks) if participants have a certain level of pain (that meets eligibility for more treatment) they will be then randomized to complete one of the 3 treatments that was not already assigned to them.
The study hypothesizes the following:
that this interventional response phenotyping can identify individuals with different underlying mechanisms for their pain who thus respond differentially to evidence-based interventions for chronic lower back pain (cLBP).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48170, United States
In addition, the following mechanistic hypothesis and Aims are included:
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction:
Aim 2: the study predicts that patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) will preferentially respond to this therapy if PROs indicate higher levels of pain catastrophizing, as measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, or lower scores on the Experiences Questionnaire.
Aim 3: the study hypothesizes that cLBP patients with decreased activation in response to pain in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) and Prefrontal Cortex and increased activation in somatosensory cortex (S1) and thalamus will respond preferentially to MBSR.
Physical Therapy (PT) and Exercise
Aim 2: The primary hypothesis for the light phenotyping protocol is those individuals with the highest scores on the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and lowest scores for PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms will be most likely to improve from PT/Exercise program.
Aim 3: the study hypothesis that low vagal tone and high basal inflammation will predict responsiveness to the PT/Exercise program.
Acupressure:
Aim 2: The study hypothesizes that females with cLBP will respond better to acupressure than men, as will those with higher scores on the 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire.
Aim 3: The study predicts that cLBP patients with higher posterior insula glutamate and/or greater insula - Default Mode Network (DMN) connectivity (as well as increased DMN-S1 connectivity
Duloxetine:
Aim 2: the study hypothesizes that it will replicate previous studies suggesting that participants with cLBP will preferentially respond to this therapy if patient reported outcomes indicate stronger elements of either neuropathic pain (indicated by a high PainDETECT score) or centralized/nociplastic pain (indicated by more widespread pain on the 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire).
Aim 3: the study anticipates then that deficient pain inhibition on quantitative sensory testing, decreased periaqueductal gray (PAG)-insula connectivity, and elevated stimulated inflammatory responses will be associated with a positive response to centrally-acting duloxetine.
Additionally, a subset of individuals (n=160) from these groups will be asked to participate in an expanded phenotyping study that will include structural and functional brain neuroimaging, quantitative sensory testing (QST), plasma measures of inflammation, and digital measurement of autonomic tone.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
for Light Phenotyping (all participants):
Exclusion criteria
for Light Phenotyping (all participants):
Contraindications to Study Intervention: duloxetine
Contraindications to Study Intervention: Acupressure
Contraindications to Study Intervention: MBSR
Contraindications to Study Intervention: PT & Exercise
Inclusion criteria
for Deep Phenotyping (subset 160 participants):
Exclusion criteria
for Deep Phenotyping (subset 160 participants):
A 4-week, online, self-management program for pain known as PainGuide (online or smart phone). Participants will use this during the run-in period as well as after the run-in period.
In this group (mindfulness-based stress reduction) participants will take part in 9 group sessions.
The groups sessions will be divided into 8 weekly 2-hour groups sessions and one 6-hour "retreat". During the sessions participants will practice mindfulness exercises directed by the a MBSR therapist. Additionally, participants will also be asked to practice daily formal mindfulness at home using audio recordings of 30-45 minute guided meditation exercises. These audio recordings can be accessed online. The sessions may take place in-person or virtually.
Participants will take part in 10 physical therapy visits over the course of 8 weeks. Participants will meet with the physical therapist twice a week for a 1-hour session for weeks 1 and 2 and then weekly for the remaining 6 weeks. The physical therapist will tailor a program to the participant's needs according to recommended PT practice guidelines that will include in-person treatment, home exercise prescription, and encouragement of progressive, low-intensity, submaximal fitness and endurance activities, such as walking.
Participants will be given a home program of exercises to be done daily and asked to engage in daily walking with a set goal based on the individual's capacity and current fitness level. Walking was selected as the aerobic exercise of focus for this treatment because it is recommended for patients with all levels of pain severity, is highly feasible to complete, and has shown effects on outcomes such as pain and disability.
A device called the "AcuWand" will be used to administer the self-acupressure intervention for approximately 30 minutes daily for 8 weeks. Participants will use a mobile application (app) called "MeTime" that will have daily instructions on how to use the AcuWand. Research staff will show participants how to use the AcuWand and MeTime app. In addition, participants will keep a daily log to track at-home acupressure sessions.
For days 1-7, patients will take 30mg of duloxetine once a day, in the morning. Starting day 8, participants tolerating the medication will be escalated to 60mg once a day. They will also have the option of staying at 30mg, once a day or stopping the medication. At the end of the 8-week intervention period, participants will have the option to continue the medication commercially (non-study medication) under the care of their physician or taper off the medication. During the entire 8-week intervention, patients will be asked to keep a daily log of medication dosage, any missed doses, and any side-effects they may have experienced.
Other names: Cymbalta
Participants will wear during 5 separate 7-day "home monitoring" periods to assess physical activity (objectively measured via accelerometry), and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of mental and physical symptoms. EMA will be collected during Weeks 1, 6, 15, 24 and 36.
Other names: Electronic wrist device that looks like a watch
Time frame: week 6 (T2), week 15 (T3)
The PROMIS pain interference consists of 4 questions on a Likert scale ranging from 'Not at all" (1) to "Very much" (5). Total scores are between 4 and 20, with higher scores indicating increased pain interference.
Time frame: week 6 (T2), week 15 (T3)
This is a 3 question scale where participants select a between 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain is bad and completely interferes). Higher the scores the worse the pain.
Time frame: week 15 (T3)
This is a 1 question item where participants described their perceived improvement between T2 and T3 by selecting a score between 1 and 7, where 1 indicated "very much improved" and 7 indicated "very much worse. The lower the score, the greater improvement in perceived pain.
Data is presented as count of participants who scored their improvement as a 1 or a 2 and those who scored their improvement as 3 or higher.
University of Michigan
Other
University of Michigan Mechanistic Research Center -The Back Pain Consortium Research Program
Acronym: BACPAC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05396014
Back Pain, Chronic Low-back Pain
Redwood City, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05463367
Back Injuries, Back Pain
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04980612
Chronic Low-back Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04238676
Back Pain, Chronic Low-back Pain
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial Details