Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05455255

The Application of the Flipped Model in the Nursing Process and Evaluation of Its Reflection in the Clinic

Teaching the nursing process that nursing students will use throughout their professional career is very important. In this direction, considering the Z generation, innovative and technology-based teaching methods should be used. Since the subject of the nursing process is the building block of nursing, its teaching should also be effective. The use of innovative and technology-based education methods that will increase the active participation of the students in the teaching of the nursing process, reinforce the learning, and encourage them to use problem-solving and critical thinking skills has been very important in recent years. For this reason, this research was planned to examine the effect of flipped learning(FL) on students' problem solving and critical thinking skills and their views on this model in nursing process teaching. In this study, it will be carried out with mixed method. In the quantitative part of the research, pre-test-post-test, experimental design with randomized control group will be used, and in the qualitative part, case study and phenomenological design will be used.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Nursing Caries Educational Problems

Age range

18 year–24 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Nasibe Yağmur Ziyai

Sakarya, Serdivan, 54150, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Ethics committee approval was obtained from the Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine.In this study, it will be carried out with mixed method.

In the quantitative part of this research, pre-test-post-test, experimental design with randomized control group will be used, and in the qualitative part, case study and phenomenological design will be applied. Considering the losses as a result of the G-power analysis, the sample of the research was planned to consist of 23 students in the intervention group and 23 students in the control group. A stratified randomization process will be carried out by applying the pre-test data to the students who meet the inclusion criteria of the study.

In this study, FL will be applied to the intervention group for 5 weeks, while the traditional method will be applied to the control group for 5 weeks.

In the quantitative dimension of the research, critical thinking disposition scale and problem solving inventory will be used. A semi-structured interview form will be used in the qualitative aspect of the research.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Not having seen the subject of the nursing process before

  • Adequate internet access
  • Being willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Not willing to participate in the study

Treatment and study plan

Experimental

Other

FL was applied by Jonathan Bergmann and Aaron Sams in 2007 for high school students who had to be absent from chemistry class. Bergmann and Sams published all the learning activities they used during the lesson as videos. Bergmann and Sams (2012) stated that in this model, which they developed over time, it is not compulsory for the trainer to explain the entire course content in the videos, and the important thing is to allocate time to active learning methods during the course. In the FL model, the summary of the course content is presented to the individuals outside the classroom with tools such as video and power point presentations. In the lesson, activities are carried out for the active participation of the student. The student performs the course content outside of the classroom, and the homework and learning the course in the classroom.

Primary outcomes

  1. Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CTTS)

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    In this study, the "Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CTTS)" developed by Semerci (2016) was used. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the CTTS scale was determined as 0.96. This scale consists of 49 items scaled as "I totally disagree (1)", I mostly disagree (2), I partially agree (3), I mostly agree (4), I totally agree (5)". The CTTS total score ranges from 49 to 245. It was stated that the students who scored high on the scale had a high tendency to think critically. (Semerci 2016).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Problem Solving Inventory (PSI)

    Time frame: 5 weeks

    The Problem Solving Inventory used in the research is one of the tools that measures the individual's own perception of problem solving skills. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the PSI scale was determined as 0.88. The Turkish adaptation of the scale developed by Heppner and Petersen in 1982 was carried out by Şahin, Şahin and Heppner (1993). A high total score from the scale indicates that individuals perceive themselves as inadequate in problem solving, while a low total score indicates that individuals perceive themselves as sufficient in problem solving skills

Other outcomes

  1. Focus group semi-structured interview form -qualitative part

    Time frame: immediately after the intervention

    Semi-structured focus group interview forms were used in the qualitative part of this study, which was conducted with a mixed research design. Focus group interview forms contain open-ended questions and allow new questions to be added when there is a need to deepen on a topic during the interview. Interview questions were prepared by the researcher as a result of the literature review. Afterwards, opinions were taken by two different experts, and necessary adjustments were made in the focus group interview form in line with these opinions. The final version of the interview form consists of six open-ended questions.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sakarya University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Application of the Web Program Based on the Flipped Model in Nursıng Process Teaching and Evaluation of Its Reflect to the Clinic

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jul 13, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 13, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.