Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06977932

The Alternative Effects of Electroacupuncture in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), characterized by its refractory nature and recurrence, frequently leads to anxiety, depression, and insomnia, thereby significantly diminishing patients' quality of life and potentially inducing self-harm. Carbamazepine (CBZ) is the first-line medication for TN, yet it presents adverse effects such as addiction and the absence of analgesic effects upon cessation. Acupuncture, particularly electroacupuncture(EA), has demonstrated efficacy in TN treatment, although its therapeutic outcomes are influenced by various factors. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of EA for TN and its potential as an alternative to CBZ treatment.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

This study will enroll a total of 126 patients with TN who meet the inclusion criteria. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the EA plus placebo group or the sham EA plus CBZ group. This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of EA for TN and to determine if EA offers a viable therapeutic alternative for TN management.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Diagnostic Criteria

Diagnosis was based on the criteria for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) as defined in the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) published by the International Headache Society (IHS) in 2018. The diagnostic criteria included:

  • recurrent unilateral facial pain occurring in the distribution of one or more divisions of the trigeminal nerve, without radiation outside the trigeminal territory, and meeting criteria (2) and (3);
  • pain presenting with all of the following characteristics:

① paroxysmal attacks lasting from a few seconds to 2 minutes;

② severe intensity;

  • electric shock-like, stabbing, or sharp quality;
  • pain triggered by innocuous stimuli within the affected trigeminal distribution;
  • exclusion of other facial pain disorders classified in ICHD-3.

Inclusion criteria

All of the following criteria had to be met for study enrollment:

  • fulfillment of the TN diagnostic criteria as stated above;
  • age between 18 and 80 years, inclusive, irrespective of sex;
  • receiving a stable daily dose of carbamazepine (200-400 mg); ④ consciousness clear, with intact pain perception and discrimination, and able to communicate effectively; ⑤ voluntary participation with written informed consent provided by the patient or their legal guardian/authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Participants were excluded if they met any of the following:

  • comorbid epilepsy, head injury, or other relevant neurological disorders;
  • significant impairment of cardiac, hepatic, or renal function;
  • cognitive dysfunction, aphasia, psychiatric conditions, or inability to cooperate with treatment;
  • poorly controlled hypertension or hyperglycemia;

⑤ recent diagnosis of severe anxiety or depression;

⑥ pregnancy or lactation;

⑦ presence of a cardiac pacemaker or other contraindications to electroacupuncture therapy;

⑧ current participation in another clinical trial.

Treatment and study plan

Carbarmazepine

Drug

Following enrollment, the patient's carbamazepine dosage remained consistent with the pre-enrollment dosage. Orally administered for two consecutive weeks.

sham electroacupuncture

Procedure

In this group, superficial needling (0.5-1 mm depth) was performed at non-meridian points located 1 cm lateral to: (1) primary local acupoints ST2 (Sibai), ST7 (Xiaguan), and ST4 (Dicang) on the affected side; (2) branch-specific supplementary points GB1 (Tongziliao) for ophthalmic branch involvement, SI18 (Quanliao) for maxillary branch involvement, and ST6 (Jiache) for mandibular branch involvement; and (3) bilateral distal points LI4 (Hegu) and TE5 (Waiguan). Local acupoint pairs (ST7 adjacent + GB1 adjacent, ST7 adjacent + SI18 adjacent, or ST7 adjacent + ST6 adjacent) and distal pairs (LI4 adjacent + TE5 adjacent) were connected to an electroacupuncture device. The electroacupuncture device was kept in the off state and did not generate any therapeutic current. The needles were retained for 60 minutes.Acupuncture treatment was administered for 5 consecutive days as one course, with a 2-day break between courses. A total of 2 courses were conducted.

Carbarmazepine Placebo

Drug

CBZ placebo is a tablet with identical packaging and appearance to CBZ but lacks therapeutic effects. Patients were transitioned to a CBZ placebo at an equivalent daily dose post-enrollment. Orally administered for two consecutive weeks.

electroacupuncture

Procedure

The primary acupoints selected were the affected side's Sibai (ST2), Xiaguan (ST7), and Dicang (ST4). Based on the affected nerve branch, additional acupoints were chosen: for the ophthalmic branch, Tongziliao (GB1); for the maxillary branch, Quanliao (SI18); and for the mandibular branch, Jiache (ST6). Distal acupoints included bilateral Hegu (LI4) and Waiguan (SJ5). Electroacupuncture was applied based on the affected nerve branch. For the ophthalmic branch, the local acupoints selected were Xiaguan + Tongziliao; for the maxillary branch, Xiaguan + Quanliao; and for the mandibular branch, Xiaguan + Jiache. The distal acupoints selected were Hegu + Waiguan. A sparse-dense wave, 2/100Hz, was used, with a treatment duration of 60 minutes. The intensity of the electrical current was adjusted according to the patient's tolerance. Acupuncture treatment is administered in 5 consecutive days as one course, with a 2-day break between courses. A total of 2 courses are conducted.

Primary outcomes

  1. VAS Response Rate

    Time frame: Baseline, the end of the 2-week treatment.

    The proportion of patients with a reduction in VAS score of ≥50% from baseline at the end of the 2-week treatment.The VAS measures pain intensity on a scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse pain. The unit of measure is "Percentage of participants".

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores

    Time frame: At baseline, and at the end of weeks 2, 4, and 8.

    Changes in VAS scores from baseline at weeks 2, 4, and 8.The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain. The unit of measure is "Units on a scale".

  2. Total Days of Rescue Medication Use Assessed by Pain Diary

    Time frame: Daily from baseline through the end of week 8.

    Patients will record any use of non-study pain relief medications (rescue analgesia) in their daily pain diary. While the specific type and dosage of the medications are documented in the diary for safety and protocol monitoring, this specific outcome measure evaluates the cumulative total number of days a patient required rescue medication during the entire observation period. A lower number indicates less reliance on additional analgesics. The unit of measure is "Days".

  3. Average Daily Frequency of Pain Episodes Assessed by Pain Diary

    Time frame: Daily from baseline through the end of week 8.

    Patients will record the number of spontaneous and triggered paroxysmal pain episodes daily using a 24-hour pain diary. To capture the continuous trajectory of pain over the entire study period, the daily data will be aggregated and reported as weekly averages. The unit of measure is "Episodes per day".

  4. Average Daily Pain Intensity Assessed by Pain Diary

    Time frame: Daily from baseline through the end of week 8.

    Patients will rate their average pain intensity over the past 24 hours daily using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the pain diary. The VAS ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. To capture the continuous trajectory, the daily scores will be aggregated and reported as weekly averages. The unit of measure is "Units on a scale".

  5. Highest Daily Pain Intensity Assessed by Pain Diary

    Time frame: Daily from baseline through the end of week 8.

    Patients will rate their peak pain intensity over the past 24 hours daily using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within the pain diary. The VAS ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse pain. To capture the continuous trajectory, the daily scores will be aggregated and reported as weekly averages. The unit of measure is "Units on a scale".

  6. Changes in the Patient global impression of change (PGIC)

    Time frame: At the end of weeks 2, 4, and 8.

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale is a patient-reported outcome measure used to dynamically monitor the trajectory of health status. This scale employs a seven-point Likert scale (1=very much worse to 7=very much better) to assess the impact of therapeutic interventions on an individual's functional status. Treatment efficacy is categorized into three levels: ① disease progression (scores 0-3) indicates a worsening of symptoms; ② functional stability (score 4) suggests no significant change in symptoms; and ③ clinical improvement (scores 5-7) represents a marked reduction in symptoms. This subjective assessment tool, through longitudinal comparison with baseline data, provides a direct reflection of the patient's perceived treatment benefit. The unit of measure is "Units on a scale".

  7. Changes in the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)

    Time frame: At baseline, and at the end of weeks 2, 4, and 8.

    The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) innovatively integrates qualitative and quantitative analyses of neuropathic pain. This involves: (1) Pain quality assessment: Utilizing 11 sensory descriptors (e.g., pricking, burning) and 4 affective descriptors (e.g., annoying, fearful), a 0-3 intensity rating system is established, synthesizing a Pain Rating Index (PRI = sensory score + affective score); (2) Pain intensity assessment: Employing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Present Pain Intensity index (PPI) for supplementary quantification. This scale significantly enhances clinical applicability while maintaining assessment validity, and has become a gold standard for neuropathic pain assessment. The Pain Rating Index (PRI) is calculated from the descriptors. The total PRI score ranges from 0 to 45. Higher total scores indicate worse neuropathic pain. The unit of measure is "Units on a scale".

  8. Changes in the Brief pain inventory-facial scale (BPI-Facial)

    Time frame: At baseline, and at the end of weeks 2, 4, and 8.

    The Brief Pain Inventory-Facial Scale (BPI-Facial) is designed to establish a three-dimensional assessment system: ① Pain intensity dimension (4 items) quantifies the frequency and severity of pain; ② Daily function dimension (7 items) assesses the impact of pain on basic life activities (including specific emotional states); ③ Facial function dimension (7 items) detects the degree of limitation in specific facial activities. Eighteen standardized items, measured from multiple perspectives, can systematically evaluate pain-related physiological, psychological, and social functional changes, providing multidimensional data support for efficacy determination. Each item is rated on a numerical scale from 0 to 10, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 to 180, where higher scores indicate more severe pain and greater functional impairment. The unit of measure is "Units on a scale".

  9. Changes in The Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS)

    Time frame: At baseline, and at the end of weeks 2, 4, and 8.

    In assessing anxiety via the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), scoring yields two key metrics: the raw sum score (X) and the derived standard score (Y). The latter is calculated as the integer portion of 1.25X, with truncation applied. Per Chinese norms, a standard score (Y) of 50 serves as the threshold for clinical anxiety, with severity stratified as mild (50-59), moderate (60-69), or severe (≥70). The standard score ranges from 25 to 100. Higher scores represent more severe anxiety. The unit of measure is "Units on a scale".

  10. Changes in the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS)

    Time frame: At baseline, and at the end of weeks 2, 4, and 8.

    The Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) is a brief, self-rated instrument for assessing depressive symptomatology. The total raw score (X) is derived by summing all item responses, which is then converted to a standard score (Y) by multiplying by 1.25 and truncating to an integer. Based on Chinese normative data, a standard score cutoff of 53 is adopted, with scores of 53-62, 63-72, and ≥73 indicating mild, moderate, and severe depression, respectively. The standard score ranges from 25 to 100. Higher scores reflect more severe depressive symptoms. The unit of measure is "Units on a scale".

Other outcomes

  1. Plasma Concentration of Serotonin (5-HT)

    Time frame: At baseline, and at the end of weeks 2

    Plasma levels of 5-HT will be quantified using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The unit of measure is ng/mL.

  2. Plasma Concentration of Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

    Time frame: At baseline, and at the end of weeks 2.

    Plasma levels of IL-6, a key mediator of neuroinflammation, will be quantified using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The unit of measure is pg/mL.

  3. Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 8

    Safety will be evaluated by monitoring the incidence of any adverse events during the study. These include acupuncture-related events (e.g., post-needling pain, subcutaneous hematoma), carbamazepine-related side effects (e.g., dizziness, nausea), and clinically significant laboratory abnormalities identified through Liver Function Tests (LFT) and Renal Function Tests (RFT). The outcome reports the total number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event. The unit of measure is "Number of participants".

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Nisang Chen

CONTACT

[email protected]

+8615990031347

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yuanyuan Wu

Other

Collaborators

  • Jiaxing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital
  • Pingyang County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

The Alternative Effects of Electroacupuncture in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 18, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.