Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01987258

The Acute Effect of Interval-walking

Four months of interval walking training (IWT) is superior to energy-expenditure matched continuous walking training (CWT) with regards to weight loss and improvements in glycemic control. The reason for this is unclear. One potential explanation for the differential outcome in weight loss is excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC), which is defined as the elevated oxygen consumption measured during the hours following an exercise bout. A large EPOC means greater energy expenditure which, if energy intake does not change, leads to a greater weight loss. This weight loss may subsequently improve glycemic control

* Aim 1: To assess the effect of an acute bout of IWT vs. an acute bout of CWT on glycemic control in type 2 diabetics and to assess mechanisms responsible for differences (if any). It is hypothesised that IWT will be more advantageous for improving glycemic control. * Aim 2: To examine the effect of an acute bout of IWT vs. an acute bout of CWT on EPOC. It is hypothesised that IWT will produce an EPOC of larger magnitude than CWT.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism (CIM), Rigshospitalet, Tagensvej 20, section M7641

Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diabetes mellitus, type 2

Exclusion criteria

  • Smoking
  • Pregnancy
  • insulin dependence
  • Contraindication to physical activity (as judged by medical history and screening)
  • Evidence of thyroid, liver, lung, kidney or heart disease

Treatment and study plan

Interval Walking

Behavioral

Other names: Interval exercise, Interval training

Continuous walking

Behavioral

Other names: Continuous exercise, Continuous training

Primary outcomes

  1. Glycemic control

    Time frame: Will be assessed immediately after the intervention using a mixed meal tolerance test (duration: 5 hours) followed by continuous glucose monitoring (duration: 48 hours).

    Glycemic control will be assessed after a one hour specific exercise intervention (control/continuous walking/interval walking) in a controlled setting (a mixed meal tolerance test). Moreover, glycemic control will be assessed during the following 2 days in a free-living environment, using continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC)

    Time frame: Will be assessed immediately after the intervention using a ventilated hood (duration: 5 hours).

    EPOC will be assessed during the hours following the before-mentioned specific exercise bouts using the indirect calorimetry ventilated hood technique.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Other

Registry information

Acronym: acute IWS

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Nov 19, 2013
Registry last updated
Feb 27, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.