Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04075448

The Acute Effect of a Walnut Intervention on Cognitive Performance, Brain Activation, and Serum Markers of Inflammation in Young Adults

This study investigates the effect of acute walnut consumption on the cognitive behaviour, mood, brain activation, and markers of inflammation in young adults. In a within subjects design participants will receive a 50 g walnut or placebo intervention in a randomised order with a one week washout between interventions.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–30 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Reading

Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AL, United Kingdom

About this study

Participants will attend two test session days separated by a 7 day wash out period. The procedure on each day will be identical save for the intervention breakfast which will either be a walnut rich muesli containing 50g walnut and 50g mixed cereal ingredients (active intervention), or control muesli containing 100g mixed cereal ingredients (placebo intervention). The order of intervention will be randomised such that 50% of participants receive the active intervention during visit 1 and 50% during visit 2. Participants will be required to follow a low flavonoid diet for 48 hours in advance of testing and to fast (water only) for the final 12 hours of this period. The test day will be 8hrs in total starting at 0830.

Cognitive Measures: There will be four cognitive task battery sessions taking place at baseline, then 2, 4, and 6 hours following intervention. The cognitive battery will last for 30 minutes and include:

  • Auditory Verbal Learning Task (AVLT) - Participants hear and recall a list of 15 words on 8 occasions followed by a forced choice visual recognition task (10 minutes duration).
  • Modified Attention Network Task (MANT) - Participants view different arrays of arrows displayed on a monitor and respond by indicating the direction of the arrow closest to a central fixation point (8 minutes duration).
  • Switching Task - Participants view eight equally spaced radii of circle displayed in such a way that there are four equally spaced segments above and below a bold line. Stimulus digits selected from between 1 - 9 (excluding 5) appear in each segment in turn. Participants respond to digits above the bold line in terms of whether they are odd or even and below the bold line in terms of whether they are above or below the number 5 (10 minutes duration).
  • PANAS-NOW - This measure of trait mood will be completed at the beginning and end of each task battery giving a total of 8 measurements across the day. Participants rate the extent to which they are experiencing 20 different emotions on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'very slightly' to 'very much' (1 minute duration).

EEG: All participants will be tested in our dedicated lab within the Reading University Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics using the Brain Products EEG system with 32 channel active electrode caps. At Baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hrs waveband PSD data will be recorded during all tasks with specific attention being paid to the theta bandwidth during the AVLT and gamma bandwidth during the executive function tasks. ERP data, anchored to each trial of the executive function tasks, will also be considered with specific attention being given to latency and strength of N1 and P3 peaks.

Bloods: Participants will have bloods taken twice on each test visit with a draw being taken from each arm. The initial draw will be taken immediately prior to the baseline task battery and then immediately prior to either the 2, 4 or 6 hr session with the second draw time being randomised in such a way that 16 participants will have blood drawn at 2hrs, 16 at 4hrs, and 16 at 6hrs. Following each draw, the blood samples will be left to clot for 30-60 minutes. The serum will be separated via centrifuge and stored at at -80°C until analysis is complete. Whole blood samples will not be stored at any point during the study. Blood serum will be analysed for anti-inflammatory ability, as well as levels of BDNF, a signalling protein known to be positively related to memory function. To determine possible mechanisms of action of walnut components through which the walnut polyphenols produce their beneficial effects, microglial cells from rats will be exposed to serum from participants in both walnut and placebo conditions prior to exposure to an inflammatory challenge (LPS). Markers of inflammation will then be assessed including extracellular release of nitric oxide (NO) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) as well as intracellular levels of inducible nitrous oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). We will then determine if those subjects with the most protective serum in the cell model are those with the better cognitive performance.

Appetite Measures: Ratings of subjective appetite and fullness will be taken using visual analogue scales after baseline, breakfast, and each of the remaining test sessions. As a further measure of satiety, weighted food measurements will be taken before and after consumption of the standard low flavonoid/PUFA lunch (given immediately after task battery session 3 at 1330) to ascertain total food consumption.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy
  • Normal or corrected hearing and vision

Exclusion criteria

  • Smoker.
  • Allergic to treatment contents.
  • Currently on medication which may interfere with the treatment
  • Anaemic

Treatment and study plan

Control

Other

100 grams breakfast cereal

50 g Walnut

Other

50 grams walnuts mixed with 50 gram breakfast cereal.

Primary outcomes

  1. Delayed Recall

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Recall of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  2. Delayed Recall

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Recall of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  3. Delayed Recall

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Recall of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  4. Word Recognition

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Visual Recognition of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  5. Word Recognition

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Visual Recognition of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  6. Word Recognition

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Visual Recognition of a previously presented list of words following a 25 minute delay.

  7. Response interference accuracy

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention.

    Accuracy performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  8. Response interference accuracy

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention.

    Accuracy performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  9. Response interference accuracy

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention.

    Accuracy performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  10. Response interference reaction time

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    Reaction time performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  11. Response interference reaction time

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    Reaction time performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  12. Response interference reaction time

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    Reaction time performance on the Modified Attention Network Task

  13. Switching Task Accuracy

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    Accuracy performance on the switching task

  14. Switching Task Accuracy

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    Accuracy performance on the switching task

  15. Switching Task Accuracy

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    Accuracy performance on the switching task

  16. Switching Task reaction time

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    Reaction time performance on the switching task

  17. Switching Task reaction time

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    Reaction time performance on the switching task

  18. Switching Task reaction time

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    Reaction time performance on the switching task

  19. N2

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    Change in ERP measure of N2 latency and amplitude

  20. N2

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    Change in ERP measure of N2 latency and amplitude

  21. N2

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    Change in ERP measure of N2 latency and amplitude

  22. P3

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    Change in ERP measure of P3 latency and amplitude

  23. P3

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    Change in ERP measure of P3 latency and amplitude

  24. P3

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    Change in ERP measure of P3 latency and amplitude

  25. Inflammatory Measure of nitrous oxide, tumor necorsis factor-alpha, inducible nitrous oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis facor-alpha.

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    Change in blood serum markers of inflammation

  26. Inflammatory Measure of nitrous oxide, tumor necorsis factor-alpha, inducible nitrous oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis facor-alpha.

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    Change in blood serum markers of inflammation

  27. Inflammatory Measure of nitrous oxide, tumor necorsis factor-alpha, inducible nitrous oxide synthase, and tumor necrosis facor-alpha.

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    Change in blood serum markers of inflammation

  28. BDNF

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    Change in blood serum levels of BDNF

  29. BDNF

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    Change in blood serum levels of BDNF

  30. BDNF

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    Change in blood serum levels of BDNF

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual analogue measure of hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food consumption (Flint et al., 2000).

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention.

    Satiety Measure recorded on a 100 millimetre scale. Scores closer to 0 millimetres indicate less hunger - taken as a positive outcome, less satiety - taken as a negative outcome, less fullness - taken as a negative outcome, and less desire for prospective food consumption - taken as a positive.

  2. Visual analogue measure of hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food consumption (Flint et al., 2000).

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention.

    Satiety Measure recorded on a 100 millimetre scale. Scores closer to 0 millimetres indicate less hunger - taken as a positive outcome, less satiety - taken as a negative outcome, less fullness - taken as a negative outcome, and less desire for prospective food consumption - taken as a positive.

  3. Visual analogue measure of hunger, satiety, fullness, and prospective food consumption (Flint et al., 2000).

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention.

    Satiety Measure recorded on a 100 millimetre scale. Scores closer to 0 millimetres indicate less hunger - taken as a positive outcome, less satiety - taken as a negative outcome, less fullness - taken as a negative outcome, and less desire for prospective food consumption - taken as a positive.

  4. EEG Spectral Analysis.

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention.

    Changes in Power for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Theta bands during performance of each cognitive task.

  5. EEG Spectral Analysis.

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention.

    Changes in Power for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Theta bands during performance of each cognitive task.

  6. EEG Spectral Analysis.

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention.

    Changes in Power for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Theta bands during performance of each cognitive task.

  7. Immediate Recall

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    AVLT - Immediate recall following first presentation of the word list

  8. Immediate Recall

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    AVLT - Immediate recall following first presentation of the word list

  9. Immediate Recall

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    AVLT - Immediate recall following first presentation of the word list

  10. Word Learning

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    AVLT - Area under the curve for first five word list recalls.

  11. Word Learning

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    AVLT - Area under the curve for first five word list recalls.

  12. Word Learning

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    AVLT - Area under the curve for first five word list recalls.

  13. Total Recall

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Sum of first 5 word list recalls.

  14. Total Recall

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Sum of first 5 word list recalls.

  15. Total Recall

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Sum of first 5 word list recalls.

  16. Final Acquisition

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention

    AVLT - Immediate recall following final presentation of the word list

  17. Final Acquisition

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention

    AVLT - Immediate recall following final presentation of the word list

  18. Final Acquisition

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention

    AVLT - Immediate recall following final presentation of the word list

  19. Interference List Recall

    Time frame: 2 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Immediate recall of second (interference) list.

  20. Interference List Recall

    Time frame: 4 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Immediate recall of second (interference) list.

  21. Interference List Recall

    Time frame: 6 hours following intervention.

    AVLT - Immediate recall of second (interference) list.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Reading

Other

Collaborators

  • California Walnut Commission
  • Tufts University

Registry information

Official study title

The Acute Effect of a Walnut Intervention on Cognitive Performance , Brain Activation, and Serum Markers of Inflammation in Young Adults

Acronym: WalCog

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Aug 30, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 20, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.