Cognitive training
BehavioralParticipants will be completing a total of 40 computerized sessions.
NCT Number: NCT04171323
Older adults at risk for dementia show a variety of cognitive deficits, which can be ameliorated by different cognitive training (CT) exercises. The best combination of CT exercises is unknown. The aim is to discover the most efficacious combination of CT exercises as compared to cognitive stimulation (which will serve as a stringent, active control) to modify the functional trajectories of older adults' with MCI, who are at high risk for dementia. The primary objective of the U01 phase was to design and pilot-test an adaptive, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of cognitive training (CT) combinations aimed to enhance performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) among persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In the R01 phase, the objective is to identify the best combination of CT exercises to delay dementia onset among persons with MCI. The longitudinal endpoint goal is reducing incident dementia. The primary aim of the study is to determine which CT combination has the best probability to delay dementia by producing the largest IADL improvements. The study further aims to explore neuroimaging and novel blood-based biomarkers.
Interested in participating?
Request Info55 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
An Adaptive Clinical Trial of Cognitive Training to Improve Function and Delay Dementia: The ACTIVE MIND Trial.
In the U01 phase, the primary objective was to design and pilot-test an adaptive, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of cognitive training (CT) combinations aimed to enhance performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) among persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The longitudinal endpoint goal is delaying dementia onset.
The secondary objectives of the U01 phase were:
In the current R01 phase:
The primary objective is to conduct an adaptive, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of cognitive training (CT) combinations aimed to enhance performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) among persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The longitudinal endpoint goal is reducing dementia incidence.
Design: The design is an adaptive randomized trial to identify the best combination of CT exercises to improve IADL function and thereby delay dementia onset among persons with MCI. Four arms of CT will be compared to an active control condition.
Outcomes: incident dementia is the primary outcome. Secondary outcome is Everyday Function: measures include Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and iFunction. A composite of performance (measured by time and accuracy) will be derived.
Interventions and Duration: Four combinations of computerized cognitive training and an active control computerized stimulation will be investigated. The five arms will be equivalent in terms of frequency and duration of each session (60 min/day, two-three days/wk, 16 weeks).
Sample size: The study team plans to enroll up to 1305 participants. Individuals with a clinical diagnosis of MCI will be included in the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be completing a total of 40 computerized sessions.
Participants will be completing a total of 40 computerized cognitive stimulation sessions.
Time frame: At follow-up visit between 6 months to 2 years
Clinical diagnosis of dementia
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Useful Field of View test (UFOV) score across three subtests measured in milliseconds (ms). Lower scores are better.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
The metrics of performance are target accuracy (in percent correct) and the variability of responses (standard deviation of response times to target images). Higher scores are better.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
The proprietary software calculates an overall executive function composite score using item response theory. Higher scores are better
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
A composite z score is calculated that reflects the overall time and accuracy of performance on the Timed IADL subtests per standard, published procedures (SPSS syntax of scoring method can be provided). Lower scores are better.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
An overall score reflecting time and accuracy (i.e., efficiency index) is calculated to reflect performance across the ifunction subtests the proprietary software determines the score. Higher scores are better for efficiency index
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrast
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Time frame: change from baseline to immediate post intervention at the end of study completion which is a period of about 6 months
Measures may include Virtual Reality Functional Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) Effect sizes of between group differences will be calculated using linear contrasts.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Jade Sutfin
CONTACT
Jerri Edwards, PhD
CONTACT
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Other
ACTIVE MIND: An Adaptive Clinical Trial of Cognitive Training to Improve Function and Delay Dementia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02228187
Age-related Cognitive Decline, Alzheimer Disease
Singapore
View Trial DetailsNCT01661894
Age-related Cognitive Decline, Alzheimer Disease
Singapore
View Trial DetailsNCT07416799
Age-related Cognitive Decline, Cognition Disorders
Galveston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06248723
Age-related Cognitive Decline, Brain Diseases
Monza, Italy
View Trial Details