Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05204472

Thalamic-Burst-DBS for Neuropathic Pain

Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic pain syndrome and one of the major sequelae after ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebral stroke.

Recently, a modified stimulation paradigm has been developed in the field of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for a variety of neuropathic pain disorders. To date, this stimulation paradigm has not yet been evaluated systematically for deep brain stimulation to treat neuropathic pain disorders.

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to investigate if Burst-DBS of the thalamus is more effective compared to classical continuous low-frequency stimulation DBS to reduce the subjective pain intensity in patients with chronic neuropathic pain after stroke or in patients with neuropathic facial pain.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic pain syndrome and one of the major sequelae after ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebral stroke. Neuropathic facial pain (NFP) can arise after damage to or affection of the trigeminal nerve caused by trauma, infection or postsurgery and results in characteristic burning and shooting pain of the affected area in the face.

The lack of effective analgesic treatment for these two conditions continues to be an unmet medical need and led to the investigation of alternative treatments of CPSP and NFP such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS is an invasive neuromodulation therapy that consists of placing small electrodes into confined anatomical structures of the brain to deliver small therapeutic currents.

Recently, a modified stimulation paradigm has been developed in the field of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for a variety of neuropathic pain disorders. This so-called burst stimulation provides pulse trains of five high-frequency pulses at 500 Hz (= 500 Hz spike frequency) occurring 40 times a second (= 40 Hz burst frequency). Burst SCS has been demonstrated to provide a better pain relief compared to classical tonic (continuous application of 50 Hz stimulation) SCS without causing paresthesia. To date, this stimulation paradigm has not yet been evaluated systematically for deep brain stimulation to treat neuropathic pain disorders.

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to investigate if Burst-DBS of the thalamus is more effective compared to classical continuous low-frequency stimulation DBS to reduce the subjective pain intensity in patients with chronic neuropathic pain after stroke or in patients with neuropathic facial pain.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent
  • Age 18-75 years
  • Patients suffering from chronic (duration > 12 months) unilateral neuropathic pain caused by an ischemic or haemorrhagic cerebral stroke or
  • Patients suffering from chronic (duration > 12 months) unilateral neuropathic facial pain due to one of the following causes:
  • post-herpes-zoster-neuralgia,
  • posttraumatic, neuropathic facial pain,
  • atypical trigeminal neuralgia after surgical intervention
  • Severe baseline pain intensity (VAS score > 6/10) considered as resistant to medication specific to neuropathic pain at sufficient doses and durations (including at least antiepileptics and antidepressants)

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant cognitive impairment (total MOCA score < 1.5 standard deviations from age- and education adapted mean values),
  • DSMIV axis I or II psychiatric disorder
  • Relevant psychosocial risk factors (any of): history of other chronic pain syndrome, pain catastrophizing, substance abuse, secondary gain
  • Contra-indication to surgery, anesthesia, or MRI
  • Known or suspected non-compliance or inability to operate the DBS system
  • Woman with childbearing potential
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia. etc. of the subject
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days prior to this trial or during the trial
  • Previous enrollment into the current trial
  • Enrolment of the investigator's family members, employees, and other dependent persons
  • Patients who are planned to undergo diathermy, electroshock therapy or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
  • Patients with implanted electric devices (i.e. cardiac defibrillator, pacemaker)
  • Patients who are at poor surgical risk (i.e. patients with multiple severe illnesses or active general infections)

Treatment and study plan

Burst DBS

Device

Patients undergo stereotactic implantation of DBS electrodes in the thalamus under local anesthesia. The DBS electrodes will be connected to an external pacemaker for a time period of four weeks. On the first day following surgery, patients will undergo an empirical clinical testing of the stimulation parameter settings. At the same day patients will undergo somatosensory- and contact heat-evoked potential recording for phenotype-stratification (post-hoc analysis).During the next 24 days with the electrodes externalized and connected to the external pacemaker, patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups that undergo two blocks of stimulation:

12 days of of Burst-stimulation followed by 12 days active tonic stimulation (Burst-DBS -> tonic-DBS) Between each stimulation block the stimulator will be switched off for one day to prevent any hang-over effects of stimulation (wash-out period).

Tonic DBS

Device

Patients undergo stereotactic implantation of DBS electrodes in the thalamus under local anesthesia. The DBS electrodes will be connected to an external pacemaker for a time period of four weeks. On the first day following surgery, patients will undergo an empirical clinical testing of the stimulation parameter settings. At the same day patients will undergo somatosensory- and contact heat-evoked potential recording for phenotype-stratification (post-hoc analysis).During the next 24 days with the electrodes externalized and connected to the external pacemaker, patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups that undergo two blocks of stimulation:

12 days of active tonic stimulation followed by 12 days of Burst-stimulation (tonic-DBS -> Burst-DBS) Between each stimulation block the stimulator will be switched off for one day to prevent any hang-over effects of stimulation (wash-out period).

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage reduction of pain intensity

    Time frame: 1 week after surgery

    Percentage reduction of pain intensity on the numeric rating scale (NRS 1-10) after each stimulation-block compared to the baseline pain intensity before surgery. Score 0-10 with 0 representing no pain, and 10 maximum pain intensity

  2. Percentage reduction of pain intensity

    Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery

    Percentage reduction of pain intensity on the numeric rating scale (NRS 1-10) after each stimulation-block compared to the baseline pain intensity before surgery. Score 0-10 with 0 representing no pain, and 10 maximum pain intensity

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of pain intensity on the numeric rating scale

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Efficacy of DBS after 12 months of open-label stimulation measured as the percentage change of pain intensity on the numeric rating scale compared to baseline. Score 0-10 with 0 representing no pain, and 10 maximum pain intensity

  2. Percentage change of pain intensity on the Neuropathy pain scale

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Efficacy of DBS after 12 months of open-label measured as the percentage change of pain intensity on the Neuropathy pain scale (DN-4) compared to baseline. Score 0-10 with 0 representing no pain, and 100 maximum pain intensity

  3. Percentage improvement of quality of life measured by the EuroQoL 5D-5L

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Efficacy of DBS after 12 months of open-label measured as the percentage improvement of quality of life measured by the EuroQoL 5D-5L questionnaire (Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/ Depression (rating from no problems to extreme problems) and health status self rating by patient (Score 0-100, 0 the worst health and 100 the best health)) compared to baseline.

  4. Change of dosage of analgesic medication(s)

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Change of dosage of analgesic medication(s) at 12 months of open-label stimulation measured as the total dosage in mg per medication per day with reference to baseline

  5. Efficacy of DBS

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Efficacy of DBS after 12 months of open-label stimulation measured as the percentage improvement of depressive symptoms by the BDI questionnaire compared to baseline

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Andreas Nowacki, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41 31 6320014

Söll Nicole

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41316323164

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Burst-Deep Brain Stimulation of the Thalamus for Neuropathic Facial Pain and Central Poststroke Pain: a Prospective, Randomized Cross-over Feasibility Trial

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 24, 2022
Registry last updated
May 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.