Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05065918

Text Message Intervention for Alcohol Use and Sexual Violence in College Students

This study is designed to pilot a text message (TM) delivered behavior change intervention to decrease binge drinking and to increase use of sexual violence (SV) harm reduction strategies among college students.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–24 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States

About this study

This is a prospective, open-label, feasibility trial of a text message-delivered intervention designed to increase use of sexual violence harm reduction strategies and decrease alcohol use among college students.

In this research study, participants will:

  • be asked to complete three surveys, one survey at the start of the study, one at the end of 3 month intervention period, and one at 6 months after enrollment
  • receive one of two sets of text messages for a 3 month intervention period and be asked to respond to some of those text messages
  • Control condition text messages: The control condition will be a version of the TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention developed and implemented by Dr. Brian Suffoletto while at the University of Pittsburgh. This intervention has been tested in young adults (age 18-25) recruited from Emergency Department and college settings, and will be used to provide an attention control group for efficacy testing. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. abstinence feedback, high risk drinking feedback).
  • Intervention condition text messages: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented at the University of Pittsburgh.13-15 Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 18-24 years,
  • current college or university student,
  • owns a mobile phone with internet access and unlimited text message plan,
  • reports binge drinking in the past 30 days [>3 drinks for women, >4 drinks men in one sitting]
  • Able to complete participation in English.
  • To evaluate messages tailored to prior SV victimization, approximately 50% of the sample will also be purposively recruited for a baseline history of SV.

Exclusion criteria

  • Under 18 years old, over 24 years old
  • Not currently enrolled in college
  • Does not own a mobile phone with internet access and unlimited data plan
  • Does not report binge drinking in the past 30 day
  • Unable to complete study participation in English

Treatment and study plan

sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content

Behavioral

The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.

alcohol use reduction content

Behavioral

The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Drinking Days Per Month

    Time frame: 3 month follow up

    as measured using a 30-day timeline follow-back (TLFB)

  2. Number of Drinking Days Per Month

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

    as measured using a 30-day timeline follow-back (TLFB)

  3. Number of Binge Drinking Days Per Month

    Time frame: 3 month follow up

    as measured using a 30-day timeline follow-back (TLFB)

  4. Number of Binge Drinking Days Per Month

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

    as measured using a 30-day timeline follow-back (TLFB)

  5. Use of Sexual Violence Harm Reduction Strategies

    Time frame: 3 month follow up

    Use of sexual violence harm reduction strategies assessed with an 11 item scale used by the American College Health Association's National College Health Survey of Protective Behavioral Strategies. Participants report on how often when drinking/socializing in the past 3 months they used each of the specific behaviors on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (1 = never, 5 = always; theoretical range 11-55) with higher scores indicating higher frequency use of harm reduction strategies.

  6. Use of Sexual Violence Harm Reduction Strategies

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

    Use of sexual violence harm reduction strategies assessed with an 11 item scale used by the American College Health Association's National College Health Survey of Protective Behavioral Strategies. Participants report on how often when drinking/socializing in the past 3 months they used each of the specific behaviors on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (1 = never, 5 = always; theoretical range 11-55) with higher scores indicating higher frequency use of harm reduction strategies.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knowledge of Sexual Violence and Alcohol Risk

    Time frame: 3 month follow up

    Alcohol and sexual consent scale. A series of questions were asked to measure recognition of what constitutes sexual violence and attitudes related to the role of alcohol in risk for sexual violence.

    12 item scale, using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"; theoretical range of 12-60), with a higher mean score indicating greater knowledge and recognition.

  2. Knowledge of Sexual Violence and Alcohol Risk

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

    Alcohol and sexual consent scale. A series of questions were asked to measure recognition of what constitutes sexual violence and attitudes related to the role of alcohol in risk for sexual violence.

    12 item scale, using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"; theoretical range of 12-60), with a higher mean score indicating greater knowledge and recognition.

  3. Self-efficacy to Obtain Sexual Consent.

    Time frame: 3 month follow up

    Perceived behavioral control subscale of the Sexual Consent Scale-Revised. Participants reported how efficacious they feel at obtaining consent for sexual activity of a 5-point Likert scale. 11 item scale ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"; theoretical range of 11-55). Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

  4. Self-efficacy to Obtain Sexual Consent.

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

    Perceived behavioral control subscale of the Sexual Consent Scale-Revised. Participants reported how efficacious they feel at obtaining consent for sexual activity of a 5-point Likert scale. 11 item scale ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"; theoretical range of 11-55). Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Arkansas

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • Penn State University
  • University of Pittsburgh

Registry information

Official study title

Text Message Intervention for Alcohol Use and Sexual Violence in College Students (STUDY00010873)

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 4, 2021
Registry last updated
Oct 17, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.