Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
ProcedureUndergo contrast-enhanced brain MRI
Other names: CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI, Contrast-enhanced MRI, MRI With Contrast
NCT Number: NCT04396860
This phase II/III trial compares the usual treatment with radiation therapy and temozolomide to radiation therapy in combination with immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in treating patients with newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma. Radiation therapy uses high energy photons to kill tumor and shrink tumors. Chemotherapy drugs, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Temozolomide, may not work as well for the treatment of tumors that have the unmethylated MGMT. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies called immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as ipilimumab and nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. It is possible that immune checkpoint inhibitors may work better at time of first diagnosis as opposed to when tumor comes back. Giving radiation therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab may lengthen the time without brain tumor returning or growing and may extend patients' life compared to usual treatment with radiation therapy and temozolomide.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine if adding ipilimumab and nivolumab to radiotherapy significantly prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) versus adding temozolomide to radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) without MGMT promoter methylation. (Phase II) II. To determine if adding ipilimumab and nivolumab to radiotherapy significantly prolongs overall survival (OS) versus adding temozolomide to radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed GBM without MGMT promoter methylation. (Phase III)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine if adding ipilimumab and nivolumab to radiotherapy significantly prolongs PFS versus adding temozolomide to radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed GBM without MGMT promoter methylation for the phase III part of the study.
II. To determine if adding ipilimumab and nivolumab to radiotherapy significantly increases the 2-year OS rate versus adding temozolomide to radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed GBM without MGMT promoter methylation.
III. To evaluate the safety of adding ipilimumab and nivolumab to radiotherapy via comparative frequency between arms of specific adverse events of interest and frequency summaries for all adverse event types.
IV. To evaluate the effect of adding ipilimumab and nivolumab to radiotherapy versus adding temozolomide to radiotherapy on patient reported outcomes (PROs), as measured by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM without MGMT promoter methylation.
V. To evaluate the effect of adding ipilimumab and nivolumab to radiotherapy versus adding temozolomide to radiotherapy on selected Patient Reported Outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) items in patients with newly diagnosed GBM without MGMT promoter methylation.
VI. To evaluate the impact of adding ipilimumab and nivolumab to radiotherapy versus adding temozolomide to radiotherapy on neurocognitive function (NCF) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM without MGMT promoter methylation.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To explore biomarkers in pre-treatment archival tumor tissue that may predict efficacy of ipilimumab and nivolumab as measured by OS, PFS, and 2-year OS rate, such as but not limited to:
Ia. PDL1 expression; Ib. Mutational burden. II. To explore (in the two treatment separately) whether the MGMT protein expression correlates with clinical outcomes including OS, PFS, and 2-year OS rate.
III. To evaluate if MGMT protein expression may be predictive of differential treatment effects between the two treatment arms.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1: Patients undergo radiation therapy for 5 days per week (Monday-Friday) for a total of 30 fractions over 6 weeks and simultaneously receive temozolomide orally (PO) daily for 6 weeks. After radiation, patients may wear the Optune device at the discretion of the patient and their treating physician. Beginning 1 month after radiation therapy, patients receive temozolomide on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 12 cycles at the discretion of the treating investigator in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the trial.
ARM 2: Patients undergo radiation therapy for 5 days per week (Monday-Friday) for a total of 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Starting on the first day of radiation, patients also receive ipilimumab intravenously (IV) over 90 minutes once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 4 doses and nivolumab IV over 30 minutes every 2 weeks until disease progression. Patients also undergo contrast-enhanced brain MRI throughout the trial.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for year 1, then every 4 months for year 2, and then every 6 months thereafter.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo contrast-enhanced brain MRI
Other names: CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI, Contrast-enhanced MRI, MRI With Contrast
Given IV
Other names: Anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Antigen-4 Monoclonal Antibody, BMS 734016, BMS-734016, BMS734016, Ipilimumab Biosimilar CS1002, MDX 010, MDX-010, MDX-CTLA4, MDX010, Yervoy
Given IV
Other names: ABP 206, BCD-263, BMS 936558, BMS-936558, BMS936558, CMAB819, MDX 1106, MDX-1106, MDX1106, NIVO, Nivolumab Biosimilar ABP 206, Nivolumab Biosimilar BCD-263, Nivolumab Biosimilar CMAB819, ONO 4538, ONO-4538, ONO4538, Opdivo
Wear Optune device
Other names: NovoTTF-100A, NovoTTF-100A System, NovoTTF-100A system (Optune), NovoTTFields, NovoTumor Treatment Fields, Optune, Optune Device
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo radiation therapy
Other names: Cancer Radiotherapy, Energy Type, ENERGY_TYPE, Irradiate, Irradiated, Irradiation, Radiation, Radiation Therapy, NOS, Radiotherapeutics, Radiotherapy, RT, Therapy, Radiation
Given PO
Other names: CCRG-81045, Gliotem, Imidazo[5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazine-8-carboxamide, 3, 4-dihydro-3-methyl-4-oxo-, M & B 39831, M and B 39831, Methazolastone, RP-46161, SCH 52365, Temcad, Temizole, Temodal, Temodar, Temomedac, TMZ
Time frame: From randomization to date of progression, death, or last known follow-up, whichever occurs first. Maximum follow-up time was 19.3 months.
Disease progression was confirmed by central review and defined using an adaptation of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria (Wen et al, J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541. Epub 2010 Mar 15) with modification such that the first MRI performed following completion of radiotherapy is the baseline MRI for determination of radiographic disease. Progression-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first progression, death, or the last progression assessment with no documented progression (censored). Progression-free survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization to date of death or last known follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 19.3 months.
Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates were to be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization to date of progression, death, or last known follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 19.3 months.
Disease progression was confirmed by central review and defined using an adaptation of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria (Wen et al, J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541. Epub 2010 Mar 15) with modification such that the first MRI performed following completion of radiotherapy is the baseline MRI for determination of radiographic disease. Progression-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first progression, death, or the last progression assessment with no documented progression (censored). Progression-free survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization to two years
Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Two-year survival rates were to be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization to date of last known follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 19.3 months.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) is a 28-item multi-symptom patient-reported outcome measure assessing the severity of symptoms experienced by cancer patients and the interference with daily living caused by these symptoms, with 9 items specific to brain tumors. Each item ranges from 0 (best condition) to 10 (worst condition). A subscale score is the average of the subscale items, given that a specified minimum numbers of items were completed.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Questions refer to the participants' experiences for the past 7 days of a given symptom in terms of frequency (never, rarely, occasionally, frequently, almost constantly), severity (none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe), interference with usual or daily activities (not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit, very much).
Time frame: At the end of phase II of study
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will assess PD-L1 expression and mutational burden expression specifically.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Will assess the prognostic value of MGMT protein expression (in terms of predicting clinical outcomes such as PFS, OS, and 2-year OS rate) in the two treatment arms, separately. In addition, will evaluate if MGMT protein expression may be predictive of differential treatment effects between the two treatment arms. Correlation methods and survival modeling will be used to address these questions.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
A Randomized Phase II/III Open-Label Study of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Versus Temozolomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed MGMT (Tumor O-6-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase) Unmethylated Glioblastoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03452930
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04817254
Astrocytoma, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02709226
Astrocytoma, Astrocytoma, Grade IV
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03746080
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details