University of Denver
Denver, Colorado, 80210, United States
NCT Number: NCT05476614
Research demonstrates that yoga is beneficial for the older adults with or nearing mild cognitive impairment. Social robots are increasingly being used as companions and caregivers for older adults with or nearing MCI . The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of social robot-led yoga for older adults with or nearing MCI. The study hypothesizes that social robot-led yoga is similar in effectiveness to human-led yoga across a range of measures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Denver, Colorado, 80210, United States
Research demonstrates that yoga is beneficial for the older adults with or nearing mild cognitive impairment. Social robots are increasingly being used as companions and caregivers for older adults with or nearing MCI. The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of social robot-led yoga for older adults with or nearing MCI. The study hypothesizes that social robot-led yoga is similar in effectiveness to human-led yoga across a range of measures.
A group of approximately 40-50 older adults (65+) will follow a yoga routine twice per week for 12 weeks taught by either a social robot or human instructor. Details of the yoga instruction can be found below. Yoga sessions will be conducted at an assisted living facility in Denver, Colorado.
Prior to, at the midway point, and after the yoga intervention, researchers will measure participants for the following:
At the end of each yoga session, participants will fill out a brief qualitative questionnaire. the questionnaire will ask the following: 1) Please described your experience. 2) What did your instructor do well, where did they struggle? To increase questionnaire brevity, the task engagement questionnaire and qualitative questionnaire are displayed on the same single page of paper.
After six weeks have passed from the date of the last yoga session, participants will be measured one final time as a form of post-participation follow up. Measures will include range of motion, single-leg balance, SLUMS examination, PHQ-9, and KIMS.
Yoga Instruction: Social robot-led yoga will be instructed by Ryan, the social robot. Ryan will be programmed to instruct 10-14 yoga postures in addition to an opening and closing meditation. Each yoga posture will be selected for appropriateness to the developmental age of participants. Several postures will be seated. Others will be standing. Participants will be given the option to stand if they wish and encouraged to move at their own pace. Each posture focuses on creating requisite strength for older adults and correlates to the study's physical measures of single-leg balance and overhead flexion, range of motion. All postures re-enforce each other. Postures will be randomized to ensure variety and updated periodically throughout the study to ensure proper level of challenge and engagement. Updates may include new postures, new verbal or video-based instruction in conjunction with physical instruction changes. Human-led yoga will follow the same format as the social robot-led yoga sessions. Instruction will be 45-minutes of yoga designed with an integrative focus. Human-led yoga will mirror social robot-led yoga in intent, duration, and posture selection.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Yoga that is instructed by a social robot
Yoga that is instructed by a human
Time frame: At Week 0
Participant range of motion while standing, arms raise to maximal overhead flexion position. Increased overhead flexion range of motion indicates improved shoulder mobility.
Time frame: At Week 6
Participant range of motion while standing, arms raise to maximal overhead flexion position. Increased overhead flexion range of motion indicates improved shoulder mobility.
Time frame: At Week 12
Participant range of motion while standing, arms raise to maximal overhead flexion position. Increased overhead flexion range of motion indicates improved shoulder mobility.
Time frame: At Week 18
Participant range of motion while standing, arms raise to maximal overhead flexion position. Increased overhead flexion range of motion indicates improved shoulder mobility.
Time frame: At Week 0
Participants will hold a balance position unsupported by their arms for a maximum of 60 seconds. Increased single-leg balance hold duration indicates improved fall resilience.
Time frame: At Week 6
Participants will hold a balance position unsupported by their arms for a maximum of 60 seconds. Increased single-leg balance hold duration indicates improved fall resilience.
Time frame: At Week 12
Participants will hold a balance position unsupported by their arms for a maximum of 60 seconds. Increased single-leg balance hold duration indicates improved fall resilience.
Time frame: At Week 18
Participants will hold a balance position unsupported by their arms for a maximum of 60 seconds. Increased single-leg balance hold duration indicates improved fall resilience.
Time frame: At Week 0
A questionnaire used to assess a participant's ability interact with their environment mindfully. Scoring takes into consideration four facets of mindfulness (Observation, Description, Acting with Awareness, and Judgement). Observation score range (12-60); Description score range (8-40); Act with Awareness score range (10-50); Judgement (9-45). A higher score within the mindfulness attributes of observation, description and awareness indicates increased mindfulness skills. A lower score within the mindfulness attribute of judgement indicates an improvement.
Time frame: At Week 6
A questionnaire used to assess a participant's ability interact with their environment mindfully. Scoring takes into consideration four facets of mindfulness (Observation, Description, Acting with Awareness, and Judgement). Observation score range (12-60); Description score range (8-40); Act with Awareness score range (10-50); Judgement (9-45). A higher score within the mindfulness attributes of observation, description and awareness indicates increased mindfulness skills. A lower score within the mindfulness attribute of judgement indicates an improvement.
Time frame: At Week 12
A questionnaire used to assess a participant's ability interact with their environment mindfully. Scoring takes into consideration four facets of mindfulness (Observation, Description, Acting with Awareness, and Judgement). Observation score range (12-60); Description score range (8-40); Act with Awareness score range (10-50); Judgement (9-45). A higher score within the mindfulness attributes of observation, description and awareness indicates increased mindfulness skills. A lower score within the mindfulness attribute of judgement indicates an improvement.
Time frame: At Week 18
A questionnaire used to assess a participant's ability interact with their environment mindfully. Scoring takes into consideration four facets of mindfulness (Observation, Description, Acting with Awareness, and Judgement). Observation score range (12-60); Description score range (8-40); Act with Awareness score range (10-50); Judgement (9-45). A higher score within the mindfulness attributes of observation, description and awareness indicates increased mindfulness skills. A lower score within the mindfulness attribute of judgement indicates an improvement.
Time frame: At Week 0
Depression Questionnaire. Scale minimum value: 0. Scale maximum value: 27). A lower score indicates minimal depression or decreasing depression severity.
Time frame: At Week 6
Depression Questionnaire. Scale minimum value: 0. Scale maximum value: 27). A lower score indicates minimal depression or decreasing depression severity.
Time frame: At Week 12
Depression Questionnaire. Scale minimum value: 0. Scale maximum value: 27). A lower score indicates minimal depression or decreasing depression severity.
Time frame: At Week 18
Depression Questionnaire. Scale minimum value: 0. Scale maximum value: 27). A lower score indicates minimal depression or decreasing depression severity.
Time frame: At Week 0
A measure of cognitive impairment. Scale minimum value: 0. Scale maximum value: 30. For those with a high school education or greater a score of 27-30 indicates normal function; 21-26 indicates a mild neurocognitive disorder; 0-20 indicates dementia. For those with less than a high school education a score of 25-30 indicates normal function; 20-24 indicates a mild neurocognitive disorder; 0-19 indicates dementia.
Time frame: At Week 6
A measure of cognitive impairment. Scale minimum value: 0. Scale maximum value: 30. For those with a high school education or greater a score of 27-30 indicates normal function; 21-26 indicates a mild neurocognitive disorder; 0-20 indicates dementia. For those with less than a high school education a score of 25-30 indicates normal function; 20-24 indicates a mild neurocognitive disorder; 0-19 indicates dementia.q
Time frame: At Week 12
A measure of cognitive impairment. Scale minimum value: 0. Scale maximum value: 30. For those with a high school education or greater a score of 27-30 indicates normal function; 21-26 indicates a mild neurocognitive disorder; 0-20 indicates dementia. For those with less than a high school education a score of 25-30 indicates normal function; 20-24 indicates a mild neurocognitive disorder; 0-19 indicates dementia.
Time frame: At Week 18
A measure of cognitive impairment. Scale minimum value: 0. Scale maximum value: 30. For those with a high school education or greater a score of 27-30 indicates normal function; 21-26 indicates a mild neurocognitive disorder; 0-20 indicates dementia. For those with less than a high school education a score of 25-30 indicates normal function; 20-24 indicates a mild neurocognitive disorder; 0-19 indicates dementia.
DreamFace Technologies, LLC
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.