Cediranib
DrugGiven PO
Other names: AZ-D2171, AZD 2171, AZD2171
NCT Number: NCT02502266
This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well cediranib maleate and olaparib work when given together or separately, and compares them to standard chemotherapy in treating patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer that has returned (recurrent) after receiving chemotherapy with drugs that contain platinum (platinum-resistant) or continued to grow while being treated with platinum-based chemotherapy drugs (platinum-refractory). Cediranib maleate and olaparib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking enzymes needed for cell growth. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving cediranib maleate and olaparib together may cause more damage to cancer cells when compared to either drug alone or standard chemotherapy.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Arthur J E Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the efficacy and identify (in)active arm(s) of the combination of cediranib maleate (cediranib) and olaparib, cediranib alone, olaparib alone, and physician's choice standard of care chemotherapy, as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) in the setting of recurrent platinum-resistant or-refractory ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. (Phase II) II. To assess the efficacy of the combination of cediranib and olaparib, and cediranib monotherapy, as measured by overall survival (OS) and PFS, as compared to physician's choice standard of care chemotherapy in women with recurrent platinum-resistant or-refractory ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. (Phase III)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the efficacy of the combination of cediranib and olaparib, cediranib alone, olaparib alone, and physician's choice standard of care chemotherapy, as measured by objective response rate (ORR: partial or complete response) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria, in the setting of recurrent platinum-resistant or-refractory ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. (Phase II) II. To assess safety endpoints, as measured by frequency and severity of adverse events by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). (Phase II and Phase III) III. To assess the efficacy of the combination of cediranib and olaparib, and cediranib monotherapy, as measured by ORR as compared to physician's choice standard of care chemotherapy in the setting of recurrent platinum-resistant or-refractory ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. (Phase III)
OBJECTIVES WITH INTEGRATED BIOMARKERS:
I. To assess correlation of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, as assessed via BROCA-HR assay with response, as measured by PFS and ORR. (Phase II) II. To evaluate the prognostic and predictive role of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) on comparative effectiveness of targeted therapies and reference chemotherapy. (Phase II) III. To evaluate quality of life data compliance, as measured by the 9-item Disease Related Symptoms (DRS-9) subscale of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Ovarian Symptom Index (NFOSI) for utilization and analysis in the Phase III study. (Phase II) IV. To assess correlation of HRD status, as assessed via BROCA-HR assay with response, as measured by OS, PFS and ORR. (Phase III) V. To evaluate the prognostic and predictive role of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) on comparative effectiveness of targeted therapies and reference chemotherapy. (Phase III) VI. To assess the effect on disease-related symptoms (DRS) as measured by the 9-item DRS-P subscale of the NCCN-FACT Ovarian Symptom Index-18 (NFOSI-18), of single agent cediranib and cediranib/olaparib combination, compared to standard chemotherapy, in the setting of recurrent platinum-resistant or-refractory ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. (Phase III)
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess exploratory biomarkers of potential HRD, including genomic scarring, BRCA1 methylation, BRCA1 protein expression, and mutations in NHEJ, and other genes that might modify HRD. (Phase II and Phase III) II. To evaluate the prognostic and predictive role of angiogenic biomarkers, as assessed by the Duke plasma angiome. (Phase II and Phase III) III. To assess the effect on secondary measures of quality of life, as assessed by the treatment side effects (TSE) and function/well-being (F/WB) subscales of the NFOSI-18, sensory neuropathy as measured by the FACT/GOG-Ntx-4, and health utility as measured by the EQ-5D, of single agent cediranib and cediranib/olaparib combination, compared to standard chemotherapy, in the setting of recurrent platinum-resistant or-refractory ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. (Phase III)
OUTLINE:
PHASE II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms.
ARM I (REFERENCE REGIMEN): Patients undergo physician's choice of standard of care chemotherapy, comprising either paclitaxel intravenously (IV) over 60 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days (Regimen I); pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 60 minutes on day 1 every 28 days (Regimen II); or topotecan hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days or days 1-5 every 21 days (Regimen III). Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. No modification of the assigned regimens, such as additional drugs (gemcitabine, or bevacizumab) is allowed. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the study. (12/05/2016)
ARM II (CEDIRANIB MALEATE AND OLAPARIB): Patients receive cediranib maleate orally (PO) once daily (QD) and olaparib PO twice daily (BID). Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and MRI throughout the study.
ARM III (CEDIRANIB): Patients receive cediranib maleate PO daily continuously. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and MRI throughout the study.
ARM IV (OLAPARIB): Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-28. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and MRI throughout the study. (In July 2018, the Data Monitoring Committee voted to exclude the olaparib alone regimen).
PHASE III: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
ARM I (REFERENCE REGIMEN): Patients undergo physician's choice standard of care chemotherapy as in Phase II Arm I. No modification of the assigned regimens, such as additional drugs (gemcitabine or bevacizumab) is allowed. Patients also undergo CT and MRI throughout the study. (12/05/2016)
ARM II (CEDIRANIB AND OLAPARIB): Patients receive cediranib maleate PO and olaparib PO as in Phase II Arm II. Patients also undergo CT and MRI throughout the study.
ARM III (SINGLE AGENT): Patients receive cediranib maleate PO as determined by the Phase II study. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and MRI throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for up to 3 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given PO
Other names: AZ-D2171, AZD 2171, AZD2171
Given PO
Other names: AZD2171, AZD2171 Maleate, Recentin
Undergo CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Given PO
Other names: AZD 2281, AZD-2281, AZD2281, KU 0059436, KU-0059436, KU0059436, Lynparza, Olanib, Olaparix, PARP Inhibitor AZD2281
Given IV
Other names: Anzatax, Asotax, Bristaxol, Praxel, Taxol, Taxol Konzentrat
Given IV
Other names: ATI-0918, Caelyx, Dox-SL, Doxil, Doxilen, Doxorubicin HCl Liposomal, Doxorubicin HCl Liposome, Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Liposome, Doxorubicin Liposomal, Duomeisu, Evacet, LipoDox, Lipodox 50, Liposomal Adriamycin, Liposomal Doxorubicin Hydrochloride, Liposomal-Encapsulated Doxorubicin, Pegylated Doxorubicin HCl Liposome, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, S-Liposomal Doxorubicin, Stealth Liposomal Doxorubicin, TLC D-99
Ancillary studies
Given IV
Other names: Hycamptamine, Topotecan Lactone
Given IV
Other names: Evotopin, Hycamptamine, Hycamtin, Nogitecan Hydrochloride, Potactasol, SKF S 104864 A, SKF S-104864-A, SKF S104864A, Topotec, Topotecan HCl, topotecan hydrochloride (oral)
Time frame: The protocol required lesion assessments every 9 weeks from cycle 1, day 1 for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression. Approximately 42 months.
Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the number of months between study enrollment and documentation of disease progression (RECIST 1.1) or death from any cause. Patients still alive and disease free at the last follow-up were censored on the date of last CT Scan, or the CT Scan date prior to two missed assessments.
Disease progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time frame: The protocol required lesion assessments every 9 weeks from cycle 1, day 1 for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression. Approximately 42 months.
Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the number of months between study enrollment and documentation of disease progression (RECIST 1.1) or death from any cause. Patients still alive and disease free at the last follow-up were censored on the date of last CT Scan, or the CT Scan date prior to two missed assessments.
Disease progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time frame: Time from study enrollment to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Overall survival will be evaluated. To allow for better understanding of time to subsequent therapy and OS, patients on experimental study drug(s) or standard chemotherapy arm will be followed after progression, with data capture to include the date of initiation of the subsequent therapy, detailed information on the type of subsequent therapy received, and time to progression on the subsequent therapy.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
The Response Rates were estimated as the binomial proportion of patients with Best Overall Response of Complete or Partial response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.
A Complete response (CR) is defined as the complete disappearance of all target lesions, while a Partial response (PR) is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions compared to the baseline measurement; essentially, the tumor shrinks significantly but does not completely disappear. Overall response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
The Response Rates were estimated as the binomial proportion of patients with Best Overall Response of Complete or Partial response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.
A Complete response (CR) is defined as the complete disappearance of all target lesions, while a Partial response (PR) is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions compared to the baseline measurement; essentially, the tumor shrinks significantly but does not completely disappear. Overall response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Adverse events will be categorized by CTCAE V4.0. This outcome will report the count of participants who experienced a grade 3 (or higher) adverse event.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Measured by the 9-item Disease Related Symptoms (DRS-9) subscale of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Ovarian Symptom Index (NFOSI-18).
Time frame: Up to 5 years
A single proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the treatment hazard ratios (and variances) for each of the experimental treatments selected for phase III evaluation relative to the reference treatment (chemotherapy) group. The model will include adjustments for prior platinum-free interval, prior bevacizumab treatment, age at study enrollment, randomly assigned study treatment and BROCA-HR status. The estimated hazard ratio(s) for BROCA-HR and the corresponding confidence intervals will be depicted with a forest plot, and assessed for qualitative interaction(s).
Time frame: Baseline up to 5 years
A proportional hazards model will be used to assess a linear association between the change in circulating endothelial cell values and the log relative hazard of death within each treatment group. Sensitivity analyses will include known prognostic factors in the model. A plot of the martingale residuals or estimated relative hazards by change in circulating endothelial cell quintiles will be used to qualitatively assess the assumption of a linear relationship between the change in circulating endothelial cell values and the log relative hazard.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
A proportional hazards model will be used to assess whether the pretreatment values of any of these analytes have a prognostic association with overall survival. The model will include clinical covariates: age, performance status, and the randomly assigned study treatment. Proportional hazards models will be used to assess the relationship between patients' analyte values and log hazard. A proportional hazards model will be used to assess the potential predictive associations between analytes, treatment and survival.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
A Randomized Phase II/III Study of the Combination of Cediranib and Olaparib Compared to Cediranib or Olaparib Alone, or Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Women With Recurrent Platinum-Resistant or -Refractory Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer (COCOS)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02068794
Adnexal Diseases, Brenner Tumor
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00565851
Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00888615
Adnexal Diseases, Brenner Tumor
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01097746
Adnexal Diseases, Brenner Tumor
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial Details