Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo urine and blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT05053152
This phase II trial compares the usual treatment of radiation therapy alone to using the study drug, relugolix, plus the usual radiation therapy in patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer that has spread to limited other parts of the body (oligometastatic). Relugolix is in a class of medications called gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonists. It works by decreasing the amount of testosterone (a male hormone) produced by the body. It may stop the growth of cancer cells that need testosterone to grow. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x rays or protons to kill tumor cells. The addition of relugolix to the radiation may reduce the chance of oligometastatic prostate cancer spreading further.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 2
University Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Compare conventional radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) for positron emission tomography (PET)-detected, biochemically recurrent, oligometastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) plus placebo versus (vs.) SABR plus relugolix.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Compare conventional or PET-based radiological progression-free survival (prPFS) between treatment arms.
II. Compare patient-reported sexual and hormonal quality of life as assessed by corresponding Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26) domains between treatment arms.
III. Compare other measures of quality of life obtained from the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale Questionnaire (EQ5D-5L), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-30), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue instruments between the two treatment arms.
IV. Compare time to salvage therapy and time to castration-resistance between treatment arms.
V. Compare local progression (SABR-targeted lesion), biochemical progression, distant metastases, prostate cancer-specific mortality, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival between treatment arms.
VI. Determine adverse events rates and compare rates between the two treatment arms.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. Evaluate genomic and peripheral tissue and blood markers of treatment response.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive placebo orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-180 and undergo SABR for 1-3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive relugolix PO QD on days 1-180 and undergo SABR for 1-3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients may also undergo bone scan, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or PET/MRI, and/or fluciclovine F18 PET/CT or PET/MRI at time of disease progression. Patients may optionally undergo urine and blood sample collection throughout the trial.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 9 and 12 months, subsequently every 6 months to month 60, and then annually thereafter or at the time of progression.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo urine and blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone scan
Other names: Bone Scintigraphy
Undergo CT and/or PET/CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, tomography
Given fluciclovine F18
Other names: (18F)Fluciclovine, (18F)GE-148, 18F-Fluciclovine, [18F]FACBC, Anti-(18f)FABC, Anti-1-Amino-3-[18F]Fluorocyclobutane-1-Carboxylic Acid, Anti-[18F] FACBC, Axumin, Fluciclovine (18F), FLUCICLOVINE F-18, GE-148 (18F), GE-148 F-18
Undergo MRI and/or PET/MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Given PO
Undergo PET/CT and/or PET/MRI
Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, PT
Undergo PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI
Other names: Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET, PSMA PET, PSMA-Positron emission tomography
Given PO
Other names: N-(4-(1-((2,6-Difluorophenyl)methyl)-5-((dimethylamino)methyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-(6-methoxy-3-pyridazinyl)-2,4-dioxothieno(2,3-d)pyrimidin-6-yl)phenyl)-N'-methoxyurea, Orgovyx, Relumina, TAK 385, TAK-385, TAK385
Undergo SABR
Other names: SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Time frame: Time from randomization to the occurrence of radiological progression detected by conventional imaging or death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
The rPFS curves will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the two treatment arms using a one-sided, logrank test stratified by the three randomization factors.
Time frame: Time from randomization to the occurrence of conventional or PET-based radiological progression or death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatments arms by stratified logrank test. Cox regression models will also be fit, adjusted for the stratification factors and other prognostic baseline factors, to estimate hazard ratios, together with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: From randomization to distant metastases or death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatments arms by stratified logrank test. Cox regression models will also be fit, adjusted for the stratification factors and other prognostic baseline factors, to estimate hazard ratios, together with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatments arms by stratified logrank test. Cox regression models will also be fit, adjusted for the stratification factors and other prognostic baseline factors, to estimate hazard ratios, together with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
Assessed by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26).
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
Assessed by European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale Questionnaire (EQ5D-5L) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-30).
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
Assessed by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue short form.
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
Will be analyzed using competing-risk methods where, in each case, death prior to occurrence of the event in question will be considered a competing risk. (In the case of death from prostate cancer, the competing risk will be non-prostate cancer death.) Cumulative incidence curves will be generated and compared using the Fine-Gray method and sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHRs) will be estimated, along with 95% confidence intervals, to summarize the magnitude of the treatment effect. In addition to Fine-Gray tests, we will estimate cause-specific hazard ratios by treating the competing risk as a censored observation via stratified logrank tests and Cox regression modelling.
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
Will be analyzed using competing-risk methods where, in each case, death prior to occurrence of the event in question will be considered a competing risk. (In the case of death from prostate cancer, the competing risk will be non-prostate cancer death.) Cumulative incidence curves will be generated and compared using the Fine-Gray method and SHRs will be estimated, along with 95% confidence intervals, to summarize the magnitude of the treatment effect. In addition to Fine-Gray tests, we will estimate cause-specific hazard ratios by treating the competing risk as a censored observation via stratified logrank tests and Cox regression modelling.
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
Will be analyzed using competing-risk methods where, in each case, death prior to occurrence of the event in question will be considered a competing risk. (In the case of death from prostate cancer, the competing risk will be non-prostate cancer death.) Cumulative incidence curves will be generated and compared using the Fine-Gray method and SHRs will be estimated, along with 95% confidence intervals, to summarize the magnitude of the treatment effect. In addition to Fine-Gray tests, we will estimate cause-specific hazard ratios by treating the competing risk as a censored observation via stratified logrank tests and Cox regression modelling.
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
Will be analyzed using competing-risk methods where, in each case, death prior to occurrence of the event in question will be considered a competing risk. (In the case of death from prostate cancer, the competing risk will be non-prostate cancer death.) Cumulative incidence curves will be generated and compared using the Fine-Gray method and SHRs will be estimated, along with 95% confidence intervals, to summarize the magnitude of the treatment effect. In addition to Fine-Gray tests, we will estimate cause-specific hazard ratios by treating the competing risk as a censored observation via stratified logrank tests and Cox regression modelling.
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
Will be analyzed using competing-risk methods where, in each case, death prior to occurrence of the event in question will be considered a competing risk. (In the case of death from prostate cancer, the competing risk will be non-prostate cancer death.) Cumulative incidence curves will be generated and compared using the Fine-Gray method and SHRs will be estimated, along with 95% confidence intervals, to summarize the magnitude of the treatment effect. In addition to Fine-Gray tests, we will estimate cause-specific hazard ratios by treating the competing risk as a censored observation via stratified logrank tests and Cox regression modelling.
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
Will be analyzed using competing-risk methods where, in each case, death prior to occurrence of the event in question will be considered a competing risk. (In the case of death from prostate cancer, the competing risk will be non-prostate cancer death.) Cumulative incidence curves will be generated and compared using the Fine-Gray method and SHRs will be estimated, along with 95% confidence intervals, to summarize the magnitude of the treatment effect. In addition to Fine-Gray tests, we will estimate cause-specific hazard ratios by treating the competing risk as a censored observation via stratified logrank tests and Cox regression modelling.
Time frame: Up to 5 years from randomization
NRG Oncology
Other
A Phase II Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of PROstate OligoMETastatic RadiotHErapy With or Without ANdrogen Deprivation Therapy in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer (NRG Promethean)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04190446
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05496959
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06674863
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06229366
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Hamilton, Canada
View Trial Details