Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT03941860
This phase III trial studies how well lenalidomide in combination with ixazomib works compared to lenalidomide alone in treating patients with evidence of residual multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation. Lenalidomide may help shrink or slow the growth of multiple myeloma. Ixazomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving lenalidomide and ixazomib together may work better than giving lenalidomide alone in treating patients with evidence of residual multiple myeloma after a stem cell transplantation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Centro Comprensivo de Cancer de UPR, San Juan, Puerto Rico
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate whether escalating maintenance therapy with the addition of ixazomib citrate (ixazomib) to lenalidomide improves overall survival (OS) among patients who are minimal residual disease (MRD) positive after approximately 1 year of lenalidomide maintenance following an early stem cell transplant (=< 12 months from diagnosis).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To establish whether progression-free survival (PFS) is superior with the addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide maintenance.
II. To evaluate best response on treatment and compare response rates between arms.
III. To evaluate the safety profile of ixazomib added to lenalidomide and compare toxicity rates between arms.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To measure treatment exposure and adherence. II. To estimate treatment duration, duration of response and time to progression.
PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (PRO) OBJECTIVES:
I. To quantify the extent to which the addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide maintenance contributes to neuropathy and associated physical and functional impairments. (Primary) II. To assess the impact of the addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide maintenance on disease control and associated physical and functional well-being. (Primary) III. To evaluate time to worsening and recovery rate related to neuropathy. (Secondary) IV. To evaluate time to improvement and response rate related to disease control. (Secondary) V. To evaluate attributes of select patient reported treatment-emergent symptomatic adverse events (Patient-Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [PRO-CTCAE]) longitudinally and compare responses with provider-reported adverse events. (Exploratory) VI. To measure the likelihood of medication adherence and examine the relationship with treatment exposure. (Exploratory) VII. To assess correlation among patient reported outcome measures and association with clinical outcomes. (Exploratory) VIII. To tabulate PRO compliance and completion rates. (Exploratory)
IMAGING OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the association between baseline fludeoxyglucose F-18 (18F-FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and patient outcomes.
II. To compare overall survival (OS) with the addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide among baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT-positive and 18F-FDG PET/CT -negative subgroups.
III. To compare the change in quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters over time with the addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive lenalidomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-28 and ixazomib citrate PO on days 1, 8, and 15. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow aspirate and/or biopsy and positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scan at screening and on study as well as undergo collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
ARM B: Patients receive lenalidomide PO QD on days 1-28 and a placebo PO on days 1, 8, and 15. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow aspirate and/or biopsy and PET and CT scan at screening and on study as well as undergo collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months if < 2 years from study entry, every 6 months if 2-5 years from study entry, then every 12 months for up to 10 years from study entry.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone marrow aspirate
Other names: BONE MARROW, LIQUID, Human Bone Marrow Aspirate
Undergo bone marrow biopsy
Other names: Biopsy of Bone Marrow, Biopsy, Bone Marrow
Undergo CT scan
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, tomography
Given PO
Other names: MLN 9708, MLN-9708, MLN9708, Ninlaro
Given PO
Other names: CC 5013, CC-5013, CC5013, CDC 501, Revlimid
Given PO
Undergo PET scan
Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, PT
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is <2 years from randomization, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from randomization, annually if patient is 5 years or more from randomization.
Overall survival is defined as time from randomization to death or date last known alive.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is <2 years from randomization, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from randomization, annually if patient is 5 years or more from randomization.
Progression-free survival defined as the time from randomization until the earlier of progression or death due to any cause, or censored at date of last disease evaluation.
Progression is defined as one of the following criteria is met.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is <2 years from randomization, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from randomization, annually if patient is 5 years or more from randomization.
Response is evaluated based on standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and tabulated by category. Response (stringent complete response [sCR], complete response [CR], very good partial response [VGPR]) is defined as below.
sCR: All CR criteria and the following have to be met. Normal serum FLC ratio at two consecutive times and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or 2- to 4- color flow cytometry. Presence/absence of clonal cells is based upon the κ/λ ratio. An abnormal κ/λ ratio by immunohistochemistry requires a minimum of 100 plasma cells for analysis. An abnormal ratio reflecting presence of an abnormal clone is κ/λ ratio of 4:1 or 1:2.
CR: Complete disappearance of an Mprotein and no evidence of myeloma in the bone marrow.
VGPR: Serum M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not quantifiable on electrophoresis and urine M-protein < 100 mg/24 hours
Time frame: End of treatment, up to 10 years
Cumulative dose will be calculated as the sum of all doses taken across all cycles.
Time frame: End of treatment, up to 10 years
Relative dose intensity will be calculated as the dose intensity divided by planned dose intensity.
Time frame: Up to 15 years
Will be calculated as cumulative dose received divided by treatment duration. Will be calculated overall and by cycle. Data will be summarized by treatment arm with descriptive statistics and graphically over time.
Time frame: End of treatment, up to 10 years
Treatment duration is defined as the time from randomization to date off treatment. Patients who are still on treatment will be censored at the date of last treatment.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is <2 years from randomization, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from randomization, annually if patient is 5 years or more from randomization.
Duration of response is defined as the time from observed response (VGPR, CR or sCR) to the time of progression in the respective group of responders.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is <2 years from randomization, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from randomization, annually if patient is 5 years or more from randomization.
Time to progression is defined as the time from randomization to progression. Patients without documented progression will be censored at date of last disease assessment.
Progression is defined as one of the following criteria is met.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of every 3 cycles for the first 24 cycles, every 6 cycles thereafter up to completion of 48 cycles, and at treatment discontinuation prior to completing 48 cycles. During long-term follow-up, 4 quarterly assessments for 1 year.
Health-related QOL will be assessed with three instruments: 1) the FACT-General (G) functional well-being (FWB) and physical wellbeing (PWB) subscales. Each FACT-G subscale has 7 items. The 14 items are based on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 56 points with a higher score indicating better health-related QOL; 2) The FACT/GOG-Neurotoxicity Trial Outcomes Index (FACT/GOG-Ntx TOI) comprised of the FWB and PWB subscales plus the neurotoxicity subscale which has 11 items, summing to a score of 0-100; and 3) the FACT-Multiple Myeloma Trial Outcomes Index (FACT-MM TOI) comprised of the FWB and PWB subscales plus the multiple myeloma subscale which has 14 items, summing to a score of 0-112 for the instrument.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of every 3 cycles for the first 24 cycles, every 6 cycles thereafter up to completion of 48 cycles, and at treatment discontinuation prior to completing 48 cycles. During long-term follow-up, 4 quarterly assessments for 1 year.
Health-related QOL will be assessed with three instruments: 1) the FACT-General (G) functional well-being (FWB) and physical wellbeing (PWB) subscales. Each FACT-G subscale has 7 items. The 14 items are based on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 56 points with a higher score indicating better health-related QOL; 2) The FACT/GOG-Neurotoxicity Trial Outcomes Index (FACT/GOG-Ntx TOI) comprised of the FWB and PWB subscales plus the neurotoxicity subscale which has 11 items, summing to a score of 0-100; and 3) the FACT-Multiple Myeloma Trial Outcomes Index (FACT-MM TOI) comprised of the FWB and PWB subscales plus the multiple myeloma subscale which has 14 items, summing to a score of 0-112 for the instrument.
Time frame: Assessed every cycle up to cycle 25
NCI PRO-CTCAE items will be administered. There are 80 symptomatic AE terms included in the PRO-CTCAE library. Items correspond to 5 attributes measured [frequency (F), severity (S), interference (I), presence/absence (P) and amount (A)] based on multiple choice questions. Response for each attribute except P which is binary is on a 5-point Likert scale with 5 indicating 'almost constantly' frequency, 'very severe' severity, 'very much' amount or 'very much' interference. For each attribute, recall is the past 7 days. Attributes measured for each symptomatic AE varies and comprise the PRO-CTCAE item library. For this study, 23 symptomatic AEs summing to 38 items have been selected as presented below. There are 10 symptomatic AEs assessed using one item, 11 symptomatic AEs assessed using two items, and 6 symptomatic AEs assessed using three items. The types of items in order of prevalence include severity, interference, frequency, present/not present, and amount. T
Time frame: Assessed at cycles 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, 37, 43 and 49
The Adherence Starts with Knowledge Scale (ASK-12) will be used to assess the likelihood that a patient is taking oral medications per protocol. The 12-item questionnaire was derived from the predecessor ASK-20 using a study population of 112 patients with asthma, congestive heart failure or diabetes. In this study, the ASK12 had good internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. The ASK-12 which elicits the same type of information as the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) also demonstrated convergent validity through strong correlation with MMAS-4 (Spearman correlation r = 0.74; p < 0.001). The ASK-12 titled 'Taking Medicine What Gets in the Way?' is segmented into 3 sections: inconvenience/forgetfulness (3 items), treatment beliefs (4 items) and behavior (5 items). Response for each item is on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5) with the total score ranging from 12-60 and a higher score representing less likelihood of medication adherence.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is <2 years from randomization, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from randomization, annually if patient is 5 years or more from randomization.
The association between patient reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes will be evaluated.
Time frame: At 10 years
PRO compliance rate is defined as the proportion of patients who submit the given PRO instrument among those eligible at each time point which excludes those missing by design (due to death or disease progression, early treatment discontinuation).
Time frame: Assessed at each cycle, up to 10 years
PRO completion rate is defined as the proportion of patients who complete given PRO instrument based on the instrument's scoring system among those eligible at each time point.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is <2 years from randomization, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from randomization, annually if patient is 5 years or more from randomization.
Quantitatively, the association between baseline standardized uptake values (SUV) based quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters (SUVmax, SUVpeak, metabolic tumor volume [MTV], total lesion glycolysis [TLG]) and PFS will be analyzed through Cox regression. PFS will be defined as the time from randomization until the earlier of progression or death due to any cause. SUV-based quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT (qPET) parameters will be analyzed as continuous covariates.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 1 year
The difference in qPET parameters from the baseline 18FFDG PET/CT to the year 1 18F-FDG PET/CT will be reported by study arm. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model will be used to test for a treatment effect on each qPET parameter, where the baseline qPET parameter value and an indicator for study arm are included as covariates, with the qPET parameter at year 1 as the model outcome.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months if patient is <2 years from randomization, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from randomization, annually if patient is 5 years or more from randomization.
Heterogeneity of treatment effect will be assessed at full information, using a two-sided statistical test for interaction between study arm (ixazomib/lenalidomide vs. placebo/lenalidomide) and baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT status (positive/abnormal vs. negative) in a Cox regression model. If the statistical test for interaction is not significant at the 0.05 level, we will conclude that there is not sufficient evidence for heterogeneity of treatment effect; if the statistical test for interaction is significant, estimated treatment hazard ratios for OS (ixazomib arm vs. placebo arm) will be reported separately for baseline 18FFDG PET/CT-positive and 18F-FDG PET/CT-negative subgroups, along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. OS will be defined as the time from randomization until death or the date last known alive.
Time frame: Assessed at each cycle, up to 10 years
Incidence of adverse events
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
Optimizing Prolonged Treatment In Myeloma Using MRD Assessment (OPTIMUM)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04975555
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Blood Protein Disorders
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05024045
B-cell Lymphoma, Blood Protein Disorders
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01139476
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06483139
Acute Kidney Injury, Blood Protein Disorders
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details