Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05624996

Testing the Addition of High Dose, Targeted Radiation to the Usual Treatment for Locally-Advanced Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This phase III trial compares the effect of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the usual treatment (conventional image guided radiation therapy [IGRT] and chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab or targeted therapy with osimertinib) versus the usual treatment alone in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced) and cannot be treated by surgery (inoperable). SBRT uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver radiation therapy to tumors with high precision. This method may kill tumor cells with fewer doses over a shorter period and cause less damage to normal tissue. IGRT is a type of radiation therapy that creates a picture of the tumor to help guide the radiation beam during therapy, making it more accurate and causing less damage to healthy tissue. Usual chemotherapy used in this trial consists of combinations of the following drugs: cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, pemetrexed, and etoposide. Cisplatin and carboplatin are in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. Cisplatin works by killing, stopping, or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Carboplatin works in a way similar to the anticancer drug cisplatin but may be better tolerated than cisplatin. Carboplatin works by killing, stopping, or slowing the growth of tumor cells as well. Paclitaxel is in a class of medications called antimicrotubule agents. It works by stopping the growth and spread of tumor cells. Nab-paclitaxel is an albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel which may have fewer side effects and work better than other forms of paclitaxel. Pemetrexed is in a class of medications called antifolate antineoplastic agents. It works by blocking the action of a certain substance in the body that may help tumor cells multiply. Etoposide is in a class of medications known as podophyllotoxin derivatives. It blocks a certain enzyme needed for cell division and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair and may kill tumor cells. Immunotherapy with durvalumab can induce changes in the body's immune system and can interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Osimertinib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It works by blocking the action of a protein called EGFR that signals cancer cells to multiply. This helps slow or stop the spread of tumor cells. Adding SBRT to the usual treatment of IGRT with chemotherapy and immunotherapy may be more effective at treating patients with locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer than giving the usual treatment alone.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Ottawa Hospital and Cancer Center-General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the overall survival in patients with stage II-IIIC inoperable node-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after image guided, motion-managed conventional radiotherapy to the primary tumor and nodal metastases (Arm 1) or after image guided, motion-managed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor followed by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to nodal metastases (Arm 2) both given with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy.

II. To compare progression-free survival between the experimental arm (Arm 2) and control arm (Arm 1).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare objective response rate (as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version [v] 1.1) between the experimental arm and control arm.

II. To compare the rate of local control between the experimental arm and control arm.

III. To compare patterns of failure (primary, locoregional, or distant) between the experimental arm and control arm.

IV. To compare changes in pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO] assessed at randomization and at 6- and 12- months following completion of radiation therapy) between the experimental arm and control arm.

V. To compare changes in quality of life and patient-reported outcomes assessed from pre-treatment to 3 months following radiation therapy of each treatment arm.

VI. To determine acute and late toxicity profiles of each treatment arm as measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To characterize and compare longitudinal quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of each treatment arm.

II. To collect biospecimens at baseline, after SBRT (for Arm 2 patients), during last 2 weeks of chemoradiation, and after first dose of consolidation therapy, to allow for future analyses.

III. To collect 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) planning scans and radiation dose to calculate regional lung ventilation and explore pre-treatment 4D-CT based ventilation to predict pulmonary toxicity.

IV. To characterize clinical outcomes, toxicities and changes in pulmonary function and quality of life among patients receiving proton and photon radiotherapy.

V. To develop and characterize a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm for radiotherapy planning and/or quality assurance.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo conventional IGRT and receive usual care chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel intravenously (IV) followed by carboplatin IV weekly (Q7D) during radiotherapy or pemetrexed IV followed by carboplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy or etoposide IV on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33 followed by cisplatin IV on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 or pemetrexed IV followed by cisplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy. Patients then receive consolidation durvalumab IV every 2 or 4 weeks for up to one year or osimertinib orally (PO) once daily (QD) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT during follow-up.

ARM II: Patients undergo SBRT and conventional IGRT and then receive standard-of-care chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel IV followed by carboplatin IV Q7D during radiotherapy or pemetrexed IV followed by carboplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy or etoposide IV on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33 followed by cisplatin IV on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 or pemetrexed IV followed by cisplatin IV every 21 days during radiotherapy. Patients then receive consolidation durvalumab IV every 2 or 4 weeks for up to one year or osimertinib PO QD in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or PET/CT during follow-up.

Patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months during years 2 and 3, and then yearly after that for the duration of the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of non-operable stage IIB or III, node positive (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] eighth edition) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with known PD-L1 status prior to registration
  • Patients must have an identified primary tumor and at least one nodal metastasis (peribronchial/hilar/intrapulmonary, mediastinal/subcarinal, supraclavicular/scalene)
  • Up to 4 cycles of systemic therapy received prior to registration for the current study cancer is allowable; any prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is also permissible
  • Patients who refuse surgery, in addition to those who are technically unresectable or medically inoperable, are eligible.
  • Patients with separate tumor nodules in the same lobe of the primary tumor are eligible
  • The patient must be deemed clinically appropriate for curative intent definitive combined modality therapy, based on the following staging assessments:
  • History/physical examination prior to registration;
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the brain (preferred) or CT scan of the brain (if available, contrast is preferred for all neuroimaging) prior to registration;
  • CT chest with IV contrast (if contrast is available and unless contraindicated, such as for abnormal kidney function) prior to registration. PET/CT may be used if the CT portion is of identical diagnostic quality as achieved in a stand-alone CT
  • No evidence of distant metastases based on FDG PET/CT scan obtained within 60 days of registration
  • Primary tumor =< 7 cm
  • Age >= 18
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Hematologic function (e.g. platelets, leukocytes, hemoglobin) amenable, at the discretion of the treating physician, to allow for treatment with chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy
  • Creatinine clearance >= 25 mL/min by the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) equation
  • Subjects with non-malignant pleural effusion are eligible provided the effusion is not known or demonstrated to be an exudative effusion
  • If a pleural effusion is present, the following criteria must be met to exclude malignant involvement:
  • When pleural fluid is visible on both the CT scan and on a chest x-ray, a pleuracentesis is required to confirm that the pleural fluid is cytologically negative;
  • Effusions that are minimal (i.e., not visible on chest x-ray) that are too small to safely tap are eligible
  • Medical history consistent with the patient being amenable, at the discretion of the treating physician, to allow for treating with consolidation immunotherapy. Patients with known EGFR/ALK/other driver mutation at the time of registration are eligible, and these patients can be treated with consolidation systemic therapy at the discretion of the treating physician
  • Patients with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen
  • Negative pregnancy test =< 14 days prior to registration for participants of childbearing potential
  • The patient or a legally authorized representative must provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry and, for patients treated in the United States (U.S.), authorization permitting release of personal health information

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior radiotherapy to the study cancer (local recurrence). Prior radiotherapy for a different cancer/condition to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields that is determined by the treating physician to impede the treatment of the study malignancy
  • Patients without identifiable primary tumor and at least 1 pathologically enlarged lymph node are not eligible (T3-4N0 or T0N1-3 patients are not eligible). At least 1 radiographically-involved lymph node is required, but pathologic confirmation of involvement is not mandated
  • Centrally located primary tumor < 2 cm from involved nodal disease that would result in significant overlap of the primary SBRT and nodal radiation fields. This does not include proximity to involved segmental and subsegmental lymph nodes (levels 13 and 14) that would not result in overlap of dose to the proximal bronchial tree or esophagus. Centrally located is defined as within or touching the zone of the proximal bronchial tree, which is a volume 2 cm in all directions around the proximal bronchial tree (carina, right and left main bronchi, right and left upper lobe bronchi, intermedius bronchus, right middle lobe bronchus, lingular bronchus right and left lower lobe bronchi)
  • Participants who are pregnant or unwilling to discontinue nursing
  • Participants of childbearing potential (participants who may become pregnant or who may impregnate a partner) unwilling to use highly effective contraceptives during therapy and for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-labeled contraception timeframe required after the final dose of the selected systemic therapy regimen, because the treatment in this study may be significantly teratogenic

Treatment and study plan

carboplatin

Drug

Given IV

Other names: Blastocarb, Carboplat, Carboplatin Hexal, Carboplatino, Carboplatinum, Carbosin, Carbosol, Carbotec, CBDCA, Displata, Ercar, JM-8, JM8, Nealorin, Novoplatinum, Paraplatin, Paraplatin AQ, Paraplatine, Platinwas, Ribocarbo

Cisplatin

Drug

Given IV

Other names: Abiplatin, Blastolem, Briplatin, CDDP, Cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloro Platinum (II), Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum, Cis-dichloroammine Platinum (II), Cis-platinous Diamine Dichloride, Cis-platinum, Cis-platinum II, Cis-platinum II Diamine Dichloride, Cismaplat, Cisplatina, Cisplatinum, Cisplatyl, Citoplatino, Citosin, Cysplatyna, DDP, Lederplatin, Metaplatin, Neoplatin, Peyrone's Chloride, Peyrone's Salt, Placis, Plastistil, Platamine, Platiblastin, Platiblastin-S, Platinex, Platinol, Platinol- AQ, Platinol-AQ, Platinol-AQ VHA Plus, Platinoxan, Platinum, Platinum Diamminodichloride, Platiran, Platistin, Platosin

Computed Tomography

Procedure

Undergo CT and/or PET/CT

Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography

Durvalumab

Biological

Given IV

Other names: Imfinzi, Immunoglobulin G1, Anti-(Human Protein B7-H1) (Human Monoclonal MEDI4736 Heavy Chain), Disulfide with Human Monoclonal MEDI4736 Kappa-chain, Dimer, MEDI 4736, MEDI-4736, MEDI4736

etoposide

Drug

Given IV

Other names: Demethyl Epipodophyllotoxin Ethylidine Glucoside, EPEG, Lastet, Toposar, Vepesid, VP 16, VP 16-213, VP 16213, VP-16, VP-16-213, VP-16213, VP16, VP16213

Image Guided Radiation Therapy

Radiation

Undergo IGRT

Other names: IGRT, Image Guided Radiotherapy, image-guided radiation therapy, Image-Guided Radiotherapy

Nab-paclitaxel

Drug

Given IV

Other names: ABI 007, ABI-007, ABI007, Abraxane, Albumin-bound Paclitaxel, Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Paclitaxel, Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Paclitaxel, Nanoparticle Paclitaxel, Naveruclif, Paclitaxel Albumin, paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation, Paclitaxel Nanoparticle Albumin-bound, Paclitaxel Protein-Bound, Protein-bound Paclitaxel

Osimertinib

Drug

Given PO

Other names: AZD 9291, AZD-9291, AZD9291, Mereletinib

paclitaxel

Drug

Given IV

Other names: Anzatax, Asotax, Bristaxol, Praxel, Taxol, Taxol Konzentrat

Pemetrexed

Drug

Given IV

Other names: MTA, Multitargeted Antifolate, Pemfexy

Positron Emission Tomography

Procedure

Undergo PET/CT

Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, PT

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Radiation

Undergo SBRT

Other names: SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: Time between date of randomization and date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 8 years

    Non-inferiority (NI) between arm 2 and arm 1 (reference level) will be evaluated by comparing the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio to the pre-specified NI margin. NI of arm 2 will be concluded if the upper bound of the confidence interval is equal to, or falls below, the pre-specified margin at the final analysis. When evaluating the NI of arm 2 in OS, a Cox proportional hazards (PH) model stratified by stratification factors will be used to compute the hazard ratio and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). OS rates will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. If the NI of arm 2 in OS is demonstrated, the superiority of arm 1 in OS will be tested at 1-sided significance level of 0.025 using a stratified log-rank test by adjusting for stratification factors.

  2. Progression-free survival (PFS)

    Time frame: Time between date of randomization and first date of documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 8 years

    The PFS analysis will be conducted using the same methods and stratification factors as the OS analysis. The superiority of arm 2 in PFS will be tested at 1-sided significance level of 0.025 using a stratified log-rank test by adjusting for stratification factors. In the event that the NI of OS is not established, statistical inference of PFS will be considered exploratory in nature only. A Cox PH model stratified by stratification factors will be used to compute the hazard ratio and associated 95% CI.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective response rate (ORR)

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    ORR (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1) is defined as the number (%) of patients with at least 1 visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and will be based on all randomized patients who have measurable disease. Therefore, data obtained up until progression, or the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression, will be included in the assessment of ORR. The ORR will be compared between arm 2 versus arm 1 using a Fisher's exact test. A binary response variable for ORR will be used for the analysis with the categories of CR and PR versus stable disease, progressive disease and inevaluable.

  2. Time to progression

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    Local control also known as time to progression will be defined as freedom from local progression, in which a failure is defined as intrathoracic tumor progression (failure in the lobe of the primary tumor or mediastinal lymph nodes) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Local control will be analyzed as competing risks data based on cause-specific hazards approaches, where deaths without local failure will be considered as a competing event and analyzed as "censoring" of local failure. The rates at various timepoints (e.g., every 6 months after randomization) and medians of PFS for each arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The associated 95% CI will be calculated using Greenwood's formula and based on a log-log transformation applied on the survival function. Results from an unstratified analysis will also be provided.

  3. Time to primary, locoregional, or distant failure

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    Competing risks analysis will be used to analyze times to primary failure, locoregional failure and distant failure as the first failure. Competing events include primary failure, locoregional failure, distant failure and deaths without any failures. Rates at various timepoints (i.e., every 6 months after randomization) for each arm will be estimated using the cumulative incidence function. The associated 95% CI will be calculated using the Delta method and based on a log-log transformation applied on the estimated cumulative incidence functions. Statistical inferences of the development of each failure between arms will be based on cause-specific hazards using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model. In addition, Gray's test and the Fine-Gray model will also be used to provide statistical inferences between arms based on cumulative incidence functions and subdistribution hazards.

  4. Changes in pulmonary function

    Time frame: From randomization to 6 months or 12 months

    Includes forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Changes in pulmonary function (FEV1 and DLCO) will be summarized with descriptive statistics, and compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The descriptive statistics of changes in FEV1 and diffusion capacity before and after treatment will be reported by treatment arm and by response categories (complete response; partial response; stable disease; progressive disease). Linear regression will be used to model changes with adjustment for treatment arms and possibly other baseline covariates, if applicable. The grade 3-5 NRG Oncology Pulmonary Toxicity Scale for changes will be reported with the frequency and grade by arm. Logistic regression will be used to model the distribution of the NRG Oncology Pulmonary Toxicity Scale by arms with and without adjustment for covariates.

  5. Patient reported outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

    Time frame: At 3, 12, and 24 months

    Adverse events will also be assessed using PRO-CTCAE items. The PRO-CTCAE is a patient-reported outcome measurement system developed to characterize the frequency, severity, and interference of symptomatic treatment toxicities. Items are scored on a Likert scale. For each symptom and each domain (i.e., frequency, severity, and interference), counts and frequencies will be summarized for the worst score experienced by the patient by the treatment arm. In addition, a composite grading algorithm (Basch 2021) will be used to derive a single numerical grade for each adverse event scored using PRO-CTCAE. PRO-CTCAE, the frequency of acute grade >= 3 patient-reported toxicity will be compared to the corresponding rate of clinician-scored toxicity using a chi-square test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Distributions of clinician-reported and patient-reported adverse events will also be compared across study arms.

  6. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lung (FACT-L) and Trial Outcome Index (TOI)

    Time frame: At 3, 12, and 24 months

    FACT-L and TOI is a measure that sums the functional well-being (FWB - 7 items), physical well-being (PWB - 7), and the lung cancer subscale (LCS - 9 items) of FACT-L. Questionnaire trial outcome index deterioration rates at 3 months and associated 95% confidence interval will be calculated for each treatment group, based on all randomized subjects. In addition, to explore if higher QOL scores will be maintained at 12 and 24 months from the end of radiotherapy as well, longitudinal data analysis will also be performed to characterize the trend of scores over time across the two treatment groups using hierarchical formulation of the linear mixed model. The Clopper-Pearson method will be used for calculating 95% CI. The deterioration rates of each arm will also be compared using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test, stratified by PD-L1 expression and T-stage.

  7. European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) scale

    Time frame: At 3, 12, and 24 months

    Subjects' overall health state on a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) at each assessment time point will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment group, as randomized. Proportion of subjects reporting problems for the five EQ-5D dimensions at each assessment time point will be summarized by level of problem and by treatment group, as randomized. Percentages will be based on number subjects assessed at assessment time point.

  8. Incidence of adverse events

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    For each patient, the maximum severity reported will be used in the summaries. Adverse events will be summarized regardless of relationship to protocol treatment as assessed by the investigator. Treatment-related adverse events using National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) will be presented in statistical analysis reports/publications in CTCAE version 5. Adverse event rates will be reported with the frequency and severity (e.g., type, grade, and attribution) by arm.

Other outcomes

  1. Clinical outcomes

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    Descriptive analyses will be reported, based on corresponding analysis plans within patients who actually receive proton and photon radiotherapy (e.g., per-protocol population), respectively.

  2. Functional mean lung dose

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    Collection of 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) planning CTs and calculation of radiation dose to regional lung ventilation will be performed among randomized patients with 4D CT planning CTs. To evaluate functional dose metrics, ventilation maps will be registered to the average 4DCT reference frame. Functional dose metrics and standard dose metrics will be calculated and evaluated. Functional mean lung dose will be defined as the mean dose delivered to functional lung. Dose to total lung and dose to functional lung will then be correlated with pulmonary toxicity including grade 2 or higher radiation pneumonitis or any grade 3 or higher cough, dyspnea, hypoxia or respiratory failure. Logistic regression models will be used to explore the correlation between pulmonary toxicity and functional mean lung dose.

  3. Incidence of toxicities

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    Descriptive analyses will be reported, based on corresponding analysis plans within patients who actually receive proton and photon radiotherapy (e.g., per-protocol population), respectively.

  4. Changes in pulmonary function

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    Descriptive analyses will be reported, based on corresponding analysis plans within patients who actually receive proton and photon radiotherapy (e.g., per-protocol population), respectively.

  5. Changes in quality of life

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    Descriptive analyses will be reported, based on corresponding analysis plans within patients who actually receive proton and photon radiotherapy (e.g., per-protocol population), respectively.

  6. Development and characterization of a machine learning/artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for radiotherapy planning and/or quality assurance

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

    Assessment will focus on four key areas: tumor volume contouring score, organs-at-risk contouring score, tumor volume dose-volume analysis score, and organs-at-risk dose-volume analysis score. Each area will be scored as per protocol: acceptable variation, unacceptable variation, or not evaluable. Cases deemed not evaluable will be considered as such, regardless of the reviewer. The scores generated by the AI algorithm will be compared with those from radiation oncologists, ensuring the AI algorithm adheres to the contours. The sensitivity of the AI algorithm, indicating its ability to detect deviations from the protocol, will be calculated. The AI algorithm will be refined until its sensitivity exceeds 95%. Inter-rater reliability between the AI algorithm and the radiation oncologists will be assessed using Cohen's κ. Concordance and discordance frequencies will also be recorded.

  7. Treatment effect and confidence intervals by sex

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

  8. Treatment effect and confidence intervals by race

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

  9. Treatment effect and confidence intervals by ethnicity

    Time frame: Up to 8 years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NRG Oncology

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial of Primary Lung Tumor Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Followed by Concurrent Mediastinal Chemoradiation for Locally-Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2031
Study completion
2031
First posted
Nov 22, 2022
Registry last updated
Jun 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.