Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo blood and CSF sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT06500481
This phase III trial compares proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) to involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) for the treatment of breast or non-small cell lung cancer that has spread from where it first started to the cerebrospinal fluid filled space that surrounds the brain and spinal cord (leptomeningeal metastasis). Patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) may develop multiple areas of nervous system (neurologic) impairment that can be life-threatening. Radiation therapy (RT) effectively relieves local symptoms due to LM. RT uses high energy radiography (x-rays), particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. IFRT is commonly used to treat symptoms of LM. IFRT is radiation treatment that uses x-rays to treat specific areas of LM and to relieve and/or prevent symptoms. pCSI uses protons that can be directed with more accuracy than x-rays which allows treatment of the entire central nervous system space containing the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), brain, and spinal cord. The pCSI treatment could delay the worsening of LM. Giving pCSI may be better than IFRT in treating LM in patients with breast or non-small cell lung cancer.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Mayo Clinic Hospital in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare overall survival (OS) between proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) and involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) in patients with breast cancer or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) leptomeningeal metastasis.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS PFS) between pCSI and IFRT in patients with breast cancer or NSCLC leptomeningeal metastasis.
II. To compare time to CNS progression between pCSI and IFRT in patients with breast cancer or NSCLC leptomeningeal metastasis.
III. To compare CNS PFS between pCSI and IFRT in patients with breast cancer or NSCLC leptomeningeal metastasis, as evaluated by central review of imaging.
IV. To compare the rate of radiation-induced central nervous system necrosis between pCSI versus (vs.) IFRT in patients with breast cancer or NSCLC leptomeningeal metastasis.
V. To characterize treatment-related adverse events using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0.
VI. To compare patient-reported outcomes (symptoms severity subscale per MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Brain Tumors [MDASI-BT] and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Spine Tumors [MDASI-SP]) in patients with breast cancer or non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastasis.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare patient-reported outcomes (symptoms interference, brain tumor-specific, spine tumor-specific subscales per MDASI-BT and MDASI-SP) in patients with breast cancer or non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastasis.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1: Patients undergo involved-field radiation therapy delivered to specific areas of LM that are causing and/or may cause symptoms 5 days a week for a total of 10 days of treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT during screening and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as possible lumbar puncture (LP) throughout the study. Patients may optionally undergo research blood sample and CSF collection throughout the study.
ARM 2: Patients undergo pCSI radiation therapy delivered to the entire space containing the CSF, brain, and spinal cord 5 days a week for a total of 10 days of treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT or PET/CT during screening and MRI as well as possible LP throughout the study. Patients may optionally undergo research blood sample and CSF collection throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 12 months, and then every 6 months for up to 3 years from end of RT.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Undergo blood and CSF sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo CT or PET/CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography
Undergo IFRT
Other names: IFRT, Involved field radiotherapy
Undergo LP
Other names: LP, Spinal Tap
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Undergo PET/CT
Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, PT
Undergo pCSI
Other names: Craniospinal Proton Beam Radiation Therapy, p-CSI, Proton Craniospinal Irradiation, Proton Craniospinal Radiation Therapy
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Time frame: From randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
Will be event-driven and will be conducted when a total of 88 OS events (from both treatment arms) have been observed. The final analysis (if the trial does not stop early at an interim) is expected to occur roughly 45 months after study activation (including the initial 6-months ramp-up). All analyses (interim or final) will be done on a modified intent-to-treat (ITT) basis such that all randomized patients who have follow-up information will be included in the arm to which they are randomized regardless of what treatment the patients receive. Treatment comparisons will be based on the log-rank test. At the final analysis, if the test has an associated 1-sided p-value of 0.024 or less in favor of proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) (equivalently, Z > 1.98), then the trial will conclude that the pCSI arm results in improved survival over the involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) arm.
Time frame: Randomization until CNS progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 3 years
Will be based on modified ITT, including all randomized patients who have follow-up information. The analysis will be performed according to the treatment arm to which patients were randomized. Analysis for CNS-PFS will consist of estimation of its distribution for each treatment arm via the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test. Statistical power will depend on the total CNS-PFS events accumulated at trial end. Additional analyses may consist of estimating the treatment hazard ratio via the Cox proportional hazards model accounting for prognostic covariates including randomization stratification factors evaluating whether the proportional hazards assumption holds or whether any treatment effect is notably time-varying, and evaluating for potential treatment by prognostic covariate interactions.
Time frame: Randomization until CNS progression, assessed up to 3 years
Analysis for time to CNS progression will involve comparing the rate of CNS progression in patients who receive pCSI to patients who receive IFRT. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) estimator will be used to estimate the median time to CNS progression in the presence of competing event of deaths in the two arms, separately. The Gray's test will be used to evaluate the difference in the distribution of CNS progression between treatment arms. These results will be interpreted in light of the competing deaths. The comparison of treatment effect on time to CNS progression will involve estimating the cause-specific hazard ratio (CHR) in a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for patients and disease characteristics (e.g. stratification randomization factors).
Time frame: Randomization until radiation necrosis in brain and/or spinal cord, assessed up to 3 years
Analysis will involve comparing the rate of radiation necrosis in patients who receive pCSI to patients who receive IFRT. Death will be treated as a competing risk event in this analysis. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) estimator will be used to estimate the median time to radiation-induced CNS necrosis in the presence of competing event of deaths in the two arms, separately. The Gray's test will be used to evaluate the difference in the distribution of TTRN between treatment arms. These results will be interpreted in light of the competing deaths. The comparison of treatment effect on TTRN will involve estimating the CHR in a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for patients and disease characteristics (e.g. stratification randomization factors).
Time frame: Baseline to 30 days from end of radiation therapy
Will be evaluated by comparative frequency summaries for all adverse event types between arms. AEs will be graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Comprehensive summaries of all AEs by treatment arm will be generated and examined. Counts and frequencies of worst (highest score) AE per patient will be presented overall and by AE type category, separately by assigned treatment group. The proportion of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher AE will be compared between treatment arms. Similarly, frequencies for specific potentially treatment related AEs where grade 3 or higher events are noted may be compared. Any frequencies to be tested will be evaluated using the chi-square or exact test as appropriate, with two-sided significance level 0.05.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months post-radiation therapy
Will be assessed using MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Brain Tumors and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Spine Tumors. Data from these four subscales will be analyzed separately. For each subscale, scores from individual questions will be averaged to arrive at a subscale-specific score for each patient. The symptom severity scores, symptom interference scores, and brain tumor-specific and spine tumor-specific scores will be summarized at each assessment timepoint using descriptive statistics and visualized with box plots and series plots. Changes over time will also be assessed visually. The comparison of changes in quality of life between treatment arms will be conducted separately for each of these four subscales using mixed effects models.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Will estimate the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by sex.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Will estimate the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% CIs by race.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Will estimate the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% CIs by ethnicity.
NRG Oncology
Other
A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Proton Craniospinal Irradiation Versus Involved-Field Radiotherapy for Patients With Breast Cancer or Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Leptomeningeal Metastasis (Radiate-LM)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06518057
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Breast Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06910761
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Breast Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06500455
Adenocarcinoma, Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05746325
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Breast Diseases
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial Details