Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04751396

Testing of an Educational Tool for Patients With Melanoma and Pre-Existing Autoimmune Disease Who Are Candidates for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

This study learn how easily patients can use an educational tool that will be created for patients with melanoma and pre-existing autoimmune diseases who receive or will receive immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs. Patients will be asked their opinions about the design, accessibility, and content of the tool. Researchers will use the information collected to improve the educational materials that will help patients make future decisions about their treatment.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Maria A. Lopez-Olivo

CONTACT

713-792-9175

Maria A. Lopez-Olivo

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate the acceptability (e.g., ease of use, design, accessibility, content) of the educational tool that will be developed for patients with melanoma and pre-existing autoimmune conditions considering or undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

II. To test the usability in real world-settings of the educational tool (to be developed) and evaluate feasibility of patient recruitment (i.e., ability to identify enough patients and consent at least 50% of the identified patients) in a pilot study.

OUTLINE:

PART A: Participants navigate the educational tool over 30-45 minutes then participate in an interview about their thoughts and opinions about the content, ease of use, and format of the tool over 45 minutes.

PART B: 2 group of participants will be evaluated sequentially (Participants in group II will be enrolled after all the participants in group I have been assessed).

GROUP I: Patients receive standard educational information during their clinician encounter. Patients also complete questionnaires over 30-45 minutes at baseline within a week prior to their clinician encounter, immediately after the encounter, and at 3 months.

GROUP II: Patients navigate educational tool over 20 minutes during their clinician encounter. Patients also complete questionnaires over 30-45 minutes at baseline within a week prior to their clinician encounter, immediately after the encounter, and at 3 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of melanoma
  • Diagnosis of pre-existing autoimmune disease
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis by a gastroenterologist
  • For ulcerative colitis, proof of chronic changes over time (i.e., 6 months) and signs of inflammation histologically
  • Treatment with aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, or immune modifiers (e.g., calcineurin inhibitors, methotrexate, adhesion molecule antagonists)
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis by a rheumatologist
  • Treatment with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (e.g., methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine) or targeted therapy
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus by a rheumatologist
  • Psoriasis
  • Diagnosis of psoriasis by a dermatologist
  • Treatment with corticosteroids, vitamin D analogs, anthralin, topical retinoids, calcineurin inhibitors, salicylic acid, coal tar, or moisturizers; light therapy, including sunlight, ultraviolet B (UVB) phototherapy, narrowband UVB therapy, Goeckerman therapy, photochemotherapy, excimer laser, or pulsed dye laser; or systemic medications, including retinoids, methotrexate, cyclosporine, hydroxyurea, or thioguanine or targeted therapies
  • Spondyloarthropathies
  • Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, reactive arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or enteropathic arthritis/spondylitis by a rheumatologist
  • Treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (e.g., sulfasalazine) or targeted therapy
  • Age of 18 years or older
  • Patients whose physicians had recommended they begin using any of the currently available immune checkpoint inhibitors or people who are in the midst of or have already made the decision on whether or not start an immune checkpoint inhibitor
  • E-mail access and computer with Internet access or telephone
  • Ability to communicate in English or Spanish
  • CLINICIAN
  • Prescribed immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • Are providing care for patients with melanoma
  • In the clinics at MD Anderson

Treatment and study plan

Best Practice

Other

Receive standard educational information

Other names: standard of care, standard therapy

Educational Intervention

Other

Navigate educational tool

Other names: Education for Intervention, Intervention by Education, Intervention through Education, Intervention, Educational

interview

Other

Participate in interview

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Complete questionnaire

Survey Administration

Other

Complete surveys

Primary outcomes

  1. Decisional conflict scale

    Time frame: Up to 4 years

    The scale will be used to assess personal perceptions of 1) uncertainty in choosing among options; 2) modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty, such as feeling uninformed, and 3) feeling that the choice is values-based and likely to be implemented.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knowledge

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

    Will be assessed using a questionnaire developed by the research team covering various content areas, including general information about immune checkpoint inhibitors and the associated adverse effects and benefits of the treatments.

  2. Acceptability

    Time frame: Immediately after the clinical encounter

    A standard assessment questionnaire will be used to obtain users' ratings of various features of the educational tool, including ease of use, presentation, usefulness and satisfaction. The items in the questionnaire come from the Ottawa Acceptability Measures.

  3. Usability

    Time frame: Immediately after the clinical encounter

    A standard assessment questionnaire will be used to obtain users' ratings of various features of the educational tool, including ease of use, presentation, usefulness and satisfaction. The items in the questionnaire come from the Ottawa Acceptability Measures.

  4. Depression

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

    Will be assessed using the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). The DASS is a 21-item self report instrument designed to measure the three related negative emotional states of depression, anxiety and tension/stress. The Depression scale assesses dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest/involvement, anhedonia, and inertia

  5. Anxiety

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

    Will be assessed using the DASS. The DASS is a 21-item self report instrument designed to measure the three related negative emotional states of depression, anxiety and tension/stress. The Anxiety scale assesses autonomic arousal, skeletal muscle effects, situational anxiety, and subjective experience of anxious affect.

  6. Stress

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

    Will be assessed using the DASS. The DASS is a 21-item self report instrument designed to measure the three related negative emotional states of depression, anxiety and tension/stress. The Stress scale is sensitive to levels of chronic non-specific arousal. It assesses difficulty relaxing, nervous arousal, and being easily upset/agitated, irritable/over-reactive and impatient.

  7. CollaboRATE measure

    Time frame: Immediately after the clinical encounter

    The CollaboRATE questions ask about the effort made to help patients understand their health issues, listen to what matters most to them, and include what matters most to them in choosing what to do next.

  8. Shared decision-making process survey

    Time frame: Immediately after the clinical encounter

    This instrument measures the extent to which health care providers engage patients in shared decision making. Items are focused on four specific behaviors that are critical for shared decision making -discussion of options, pros, cons and preferences.

  9. Patient's perception of usefulness of the tool

    Time frame: Immediately after the clinical encounter

    Will use the Preparation for Decision Making Scale (Prep-DM) to assess the patients' perception of how useful the educational tool is in preparing them to communicate with their practitioner at a consultation. It is a 10-item scale developed to evaluate decision processes relating to the preparation of patients for decision making and dialoguing with their practitioners.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Angeles Lopez-Olivo

CONTACT

[email protected]

713-792-9175

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

Testing of an Educational Tool for Patients With Melanoma and Concomitant Autoimmune Disease Who Are Candidates for Adjuvant Therapy With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Acceptability and Usability With Patients and Providers

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 12, 2021
Registry last updated
May 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.