Texas A&M Health
College Station, Texas, 77843-1266, United States
NCT Number: NCT06370494
Aim 1.1 To understand if diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) improves diabetes-related outcomes among those with Type 2 diabetes living in Texas.
Aim 1.2 To examine how rurality affects study participation, engagement in, and effectiveness of different education interventions.
These aims are based on a randomized controlled trial of different evidence-based diabetes self-management interventions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
College Station, Texas, 77843-1266, United States
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to assess the outcomes associated with different technological intervention approaches. This 3-arm RCT assessed independent and combined interventions:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Interventions are different aspects of digital health utilizing American Diabetes Association recognized diabetes programs/applications or a combined approach. All participants were randomly assigned to their education arm and received an A1c kit, glucometer, testing strips, and surveys.
Time frame: 12 months
A1C values will be treated continuously in analyses, with possible values ranging from 4 to 14 due to instrument precision at the higher values.
Time frame: 12 months
Knowledge of diabetes will be measured by the simplified version of the Revised Diabetes Knowledge Scale (True/False version). 10 True False questions will be included with answers of True, False, and I don't know. Correct responses receive 1 point indicating a range of 0-10 points for this outcome measure.
Time frame: 12 months
Diabetes self-management behavior will be measured by the adapted Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure (SDSCA). The SDSCA is a brief self-report questionnaire that includes items assessing the following aspects of the diabetes regimen: general diet, specific exercise, blood-glucose testing, foot care, alcohol, and smoking. The scale has been adapted to examine self-care activities before and since COVID-19. Furthermore, a question about alcohol drinking has been added. Diabetes Self-care is the number of days a participant performed certain activities pertaining to diabetes care in a typical week. The diabetes self care scale is 8 questions asking how many days per week a participant engaged in a behavior on a scale of 0-7 days. Therefore, the scale ranged from 0-56 points, with higher points indicating greater occurrence of diabetes self care.
Time frame: 12 months
Confidence in doing specific activities related to diabetes will be measured by the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale. The scale is a self-report instrument that asks how confident individuals feel doing specific activities related to diabetes (e.g., diet, exercise, blood sugar monitoring).Diabetes confidence is how confident a participant is in their own ability to perform certain activities. To analyze this, a sum of 8 questions was taken. Diabetes confidence scale is 8 questions on scale of 1-10 ranging from ("not at all confident" to "totally confident"). The higher the sum is, the higher the confidence. Therefore, final outcome scores will range from 8-80, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in diabetes management.
Time frame: 12 months
Distress related to living with diabetes will be measured by the 2-item Diabetes Distress Screening Scale (DDS2). The DDS2 asks participants to rate the degree to which of perceived magnitudes of problems concerning diabetes that may have distressed or bothered participants. Diabetes distress is how distress a participant is in performing activities pertaining to diabetes care. Diabetes distress scale is 6 questions on a scale of 1-6 ranging from ("not a problem" to "a very serious problem"). To analyze this, a sum of 6 questions was taken. The higher the sum is, the more distressed the participant is. Therefore, the scale ranged from 6-36 points, with higher points more diabetes distress.
Time frame: 12 months
-Number of participants with A1c reduction that is at least .5 (clinically significant). In addition to the continuous A1C measurements, an indicator variable will be created to indicate a clinically meaningful change (e.g., whether A1C dropped more than 0.5 at the 6-month). Possible A1c values ranging from 4 to 14 due to instrument precision at the higher values.
Texas A&M University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05259449
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07251504
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00445627
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details