Atezolizumab
BiologicalGiven IV
Other names: MPDL 3280A, MPDL 328OA, MPDL-3280A, MPDL3280A, MPDL328OA, RG 7446, RG-7446, RG7446, RO 5541267, RO-5541267, RO5541267, Tecentriq
NCT Number: NCT07166406
This phase III trial compares the effect of immunotherapy (IO) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to IO alone in treating patients with liver cancer (hepatocellular cancer) that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced). The usual approach is treatment with IO-based drug combinations, such as atezolizumab and bevacizumab, durvalumab and tremelimumab, or ipilimumab and nivolumab. IO with monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab, tremelimumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab and ipilimumab, may help the body's immune system attack the tumor, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Bevacizumab is in a class of medications called antiangiogenic agents. It works by stopping the formation of blood vessels that bring oxygen and nutrients to tumor. This may slow the growth and spread of tumor cells. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. SBRT is a type of external radiation therapy that uses special equipment to position a patient and precisely deliver radiation to tumors in the body (except the brain). The total dose of radiation is divided into smaller doses given over several days. This type of radiation therapy helps spare normal tissue. Giving IO with SBRT may be more effective than IO alone in helping patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer live longer.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
University Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine if liver SBRT in combination with IO-based systemic therapy improves survival compared to IO-based systemic therapy alone, in patients with hepatocellular cancer with macrovascular invasion.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate and compare progression-free survival between treatment arms. II. To evaluate and compare objective response rate between treatment arms. III. To evaluate and compare vascular recanalization between treatment arms. IV. To evaluate and compare biochemical decline in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) between treatment arms.
V. To evaluate and compare toxicity within and between treatment arms. VI. To evaluate and compare liver decompensation per Child Pugh score between treatment arms.
VII. To evaluate and compare liver decompensation per modified albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) (mALBI) score between treatment arms.
HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQOL) OBJECTIVES:
I. Primary: To compare Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) total score at 6 months between the treatment arms.
II. Secondary: To evaluate and compare quality-adjusted survival using European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) between treatment arms. (Will be done if the overall survival primary endpoint is met and/or if EQ-5D significantly differs between treatment arms.) III. Exploratory: To evaluate FACT-Hep total scores over time between the treatment arms.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Biospecimen collection for future correlative analyses.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1: Patients receive 1 of 3 IO-based systemic treatments per physician's decision.
TREATMENT A: Patients receive atezolizumab and bevacizumab intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
TREATMENT B: Patients receive tremelimumab IV once and durvalumab IV every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
TREATMENT C: Patients receive nivolumab and ipilimumab IV every 3 weeks for up to 4 doses followed by nivolumab IV every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM 2: Patients receive 1 of 3 IO-based systemic treatments per physician's decision.
TREATMENT A: Patients undergo liver SBRT once daily (QD), once every other day (QOD), or twice weekly for 5 fractions over up to 3 weeks. Patients also receive atezolizumab and bevacizumab IV every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
TREATMENT B: Patients undergo liver SBRT QD, QOD, or twice weekly for 5 fractions over up to 3 weeks. Patients also receive tremelimumab IV once and durvalumab IV every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
TREATMENT C: Patients undergo liver SBRT QD, QOD, or twice weekly for 5 fractions over up to 3 weeks. Patients also receive nivolumab and ipilimumab IV every 3 weeks for up to 4 doses followed by nivolumab IV every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection, chest computed tomography (CT) and CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the study and may also undergo positron emission tomography (PET)/CT prior to registration.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years then yearly.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Given IV
Other names: MPDL 3280A, MPDL 328OA, MPDL-3280A, MPDL3280A, MPDL328OA, RG 7446, RG-7446, RG7446, RO 5541267, RO-5541267, RO5541267, Tecentriq
Given IV
Other names: ABP 215, ABP-215, ABP215, Alymsys, Anti-VEGF, Anti-VEGF Humanized Monoclonal Antibody, Anti-VEGF Monoclonal Antibody SIBP04, Anti-VEGF rhuMAb, Avastin, Avzivi, Aybintio, BAT 1706, BAT-1706, BAT1706, BAT1706 Biosimilar, Bevacizumab awwb, Bevacizumab Biosimilar ABP 215, Bevacizumab Biosimilar BAT1706, Bevacizumab Biosimilar BEVZ92, Bevacizumab Biosimilar BI 695502, Bevacizumab Biosimilar CBT 124, Bevacizumab Biosimilar CT-P16, Bevacizumab Biosimilar FKB238, Bevacizumab Biosimilar GB-222, Bevacizumab Biosimilar HD204, Bevacizumab Biosimilar HLX04, Bevacizumab Biosimilar IBI305, Bevacizumab Biosimilar LY01008, Bevacizumab Biosimilar MB02, Bevacizumab Biosimilar MIL60, Bevacizumab Biosimilar Mvasi, Bevacizumab Biosimilar MYL-1402O, Bevacizumab Biosimilar QL 1101, Bevacizumab Biosimilar QL1101, Bevacizumab Biosimilar RPH-001, Bevacizumab Biosimilar SCT501, Bevacizumab Biosimilar Zirabev, Bevacizumab-adcd, Bevacizumab-awwb, Bevacizumab-aybi, Bevacizumab-bvzr, Bevacizumab-equi, Bevacizumab-maly, Bevacizumab-onbe, Bevacizumab-tnjn, BP102, BP102 Biosimilar, CT P16, CT-P16, CTP16, Equidacent, FKB 238, FKB-238, FKB238, HD204, Immunoglobulin G1 (Human-Mouse Monoclonal rhuMab-VEGF Gamma-Chain Anti-Human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor), Disulfide With Human-Mouse Monoclonal rhuMab-VEGF Light Chain, Dimer, MB 02, MB-02, MB02, Mvasi, MYL-1402O, Onbevzi, Oyavas, PF 06439535, PF-06439535, PF06439535, QL1101, Recombinant Humanized Anti-VEGF Monoclonal Antibody, rhuMab-VEGF, SCT501, SIBP 04, SIBP-04, SIBP04, Vegzelma, Zirabev
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo CT and PET/CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography
Given IV
Other names: Imfinzi, Immunoglobulin G1, Anti-(Human Protein B7-H1) (Human Monoclonal MEDI4736 Heavy Chain), Disulfide with Human Monoclonal MEDI4736 Kappa-chain, Dimer, MEDI 4736, MEDI-4736, MEDI4736
Given IV
Other names: Anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Antigen-4 Monoclonal Antibody, BMS 734016, BMS-734016, BMS734016, Ipilimumab Biosimilar CS1002, MDX 010, MDX-010, MDX-CTLA4, MDX010, Yervoy
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Given IV
Other names: ABP 206, BCD-263, BMS 936558, BMS-936558, BMS936558, CMAB819, MDX 1106, MDX-1106, MDX1106, NIVO, Nivolumab Biosimilar ABP 206, Nivolumab Biosimilar BCD-263, Nivolumab Biosimilar CMAB819, ONO 4538, ONO-4538, ONO4538, Opdivo
Undergo PET/CT
Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, PT
Ancillary studies
Undergo liver SBRT
Other names: SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Given IV
Other names: Anti-CTLA4 Human Monoclonal Antibody CP-675,206, CP 675, CP 675206, CP-675, CP-675,206, CP-675206, CP675, CP675206, Imjudo, Ticilimumab, Tremelimumab-actl
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958). The distributions of the OS estimates between the two arms will be compared using a log-rank test. The Cox regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, including, but not limited to stratification factors, which may be associated with OS. The primary analysis will happen after at least 150 OS events (deaths) have occurred and will be tested with a 1-sided significance level of 0.022 (level based on not having stopped at either of the 2 planned interim analyses).
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first PFS failure or last follow-up for patients without a reported PFS event, assessed up to 5 years
Defined as local progression, distant failure, or death due to any cause. PFS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958) and estimates between treatment arms will be compared using the log-rank test (Mantel 1966). The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with PFS (Cox 1972).
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Defined as having a complete or partial response. ORR will be compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test. Duration of response will also be reported.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Defined as having a complete or partial vascular thrombosis response. The VR proportion for each treatment arm will be determined and compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test. Time to best VR response before progression and duration of VR response will be reported, but no statistical testing will be done.
Time frame: Up to 90 days from randomization
Defined as grade ≥ 4 adverse events (AEs). Will be compared between the treatment arms using a Z-test.
Time frame: Up to 18 months after randomization
Defined as grade ≥ 4 hepatobiliary or gastrointestinal AEs and any grade 5 AE definitely related to protocol treatment. The percentage of patients with the above-specified treatment related AEs will be compared between the treatment arms using a Z-test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Failure is defined as a ≥ 20% decrease in AFP from baseline. The BD-AFP proportion for each treatment arm will be determined and compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Failure for this endpoint is the first occurrence of a worsening of Child Pugh score by 2 or more. The LDR-CP proportion for each treatment arm will be determined and compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Failure for this endpoint is the first occurrence of a decrease in grade. The LDR-mALBI proportion for each treatment arm will be determined and compared between treatment arms using a chi-squared test.
Time frame: At 6 months
Mean FACT-Hep total score will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test, if normality is met, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test if not. Regression modeling will be used to analyze the effects of factors (e.g. stratification factors and other relevant baseline factors), in addition to treatment, that may be associated with 6-month mean FACT-Hep total score. No statistical testing will be done for subscales.
Time frame: At baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months from randomization
A mixed effects model will be used to assess changes over time. Fixed effects will include baseline scores, treatment arm, stratification factors, as well as the interaction between time and treatment. If the interaction between time and treatment is significant at the 0.05 level, t-tests assessing the between arm difference at each timepoint, within the context of the model, will be conducted.
Time frame: At baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months post treatment completion
If the primary endpoint supports the primary hypothesis and/or the European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) significantly differs between treatment arms, the quality-adjusted survival of each treatment will be evaluated and compared using the EQ-5D scale. The EQ-5D is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. To examine trade-offs between the survival time and QOL, they will be combined for each patient into a single measurement: quality-adjusted life years (QALY). QALY is defined by the weighted sum of different time episodes added up to a total quality-adjusted survival time. QALY will be analyzed using the EQ-5D, using a 2-sided alpha=0.025 to adjust for multiple comparisons.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years
Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by sex will be provided.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years
Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% CIs by race will be provided.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years
Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% CIs by ethnicity will be provided.
NRG Oncology
Other
Phase III Randomized Trial of IO-Based Systemic Treatment +/- Liver SBRT in Hepatocellular Cancer With Macrovascular Invasion (HELIO-RT)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06811116
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05092373
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07042919
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07405086
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial Details