Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06958328

Testing Higher Dose Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

This phase III trial compares the effect of dose-escalated radiation therapy to usual care in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who have received an initial 4-6 months of chemotherapy. Usual care options include additional chemotherapy, observation, or standard lower-dose radiation therapy. These treatments may delay tumor growth but have not been shown to improve survival. Radiation therapy uses high energy X-rays to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Dose-escalated radiation therapy involves the precise delivery of higher doses to the tumor, often over a shorter period of time. This trial assesses whether using dose-escalated radiation therapy can prolong survival.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To evaluate whether dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) improves 3-year overall survival (OS) compared to standard treatments without dose-escalated RT, in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients without radiographic progression and with biochemical response after an initial interval of chemotherapy.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate and compare local progression between the two treatment arms. II. To evaluate and compare progression-free survival (PFS) between the two treatment arms.

III. To evaluate and compare chemotherapy-free interval between the two treatment arms.

IV. To evaluate and compare toxicity within and between the two treatment arms.

HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE (HRQOL) OBJECTIVES:

I. Primary: To compare Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) Total Score at 6 months between the two treatment arms.

II. Secondary: To compare nadir of HRQoL scores over course of study participation between the two treatment arms.

III. Secondary: To evaluate HRQoL scores over time between the two treatment arms.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:

I. Biospecimen collection for future correlative analyses.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I (STANDARD OF CARE): Patients are assigned to 1 of 3 treatment options per physician's decision.

OPTION 1: Patients continue to receive fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, leucovorin calcium, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX or modified FOLFIRINOX [mFOLFIRINOX]) or fluorouracil, liposomal irinotecan, leucovorin calcium, and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel per standard of care for a total of 6 months of treatment. Patients may continue treatment beyond 6 months at physician's discretion.

OPTION 2: Patients undergo standard dose radiation therapy once daily for 28 or 30 fractions and receive concurrent fluorouracil or capecitabine per standard of care during radiation therapy. After completing concurrent chemoradiation, patients who received less than 6 months of chemotherapy at study entry are encouraged to receive the remaining chemotherapy to total 6 months of chemotherapy. Patients may continue chemotherapy treatment beyond 6 months at physician's discretion.

OPTION 3: Patients undergo observation per standard of care. (It is recommended [but not required] that this option only be for patients that have already completed total 6 months chemotherapy pre-randomization.)

Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and tumor tissue biopsy throughout the study. Patients may optionally undergo positron emission tomography (PET)/CT prior to treatment.

ARM II (DOSE-ESCALATED RADIATION THERAPY): Patients undergo dose-escalated RT daily, every other day, or twice weekly for 5 fractions or daily for 25 fractions (with or without concurrent fluorouracil or capecitabine for 25 fractions only). The 5-fraction regimen is preferred when feasible. After completing dose-escalated RT, patients who received less than 6 months of chemotherapy at study entry are encouraged to receive the remaining chemotherapy to total 6 months of chemotherapy. Patients may continue chemotherapy treatment beyond 6 months at physician's discretion. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection, CT, MRI and tumor tissue biopsy throughout the study. Patients may optionally undergo PET/CT prior to treatment.

Patients are followed every 3 months from study entry for 2 years then annually for 3 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • At time of enrollment, the patient must have received 4-6 months of active chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX or NALIRIFOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Patients are permitted to receive more than 1 type of chemotherapy for toxicity reasons, but not for disease progression. "Active chemotherapy" refers to time on chemotherapy not counting treatment breaks (i.e. if a patient had 1 month of chemotherapy followed by 1 month break, this would count as 1 month chemotherapy). Study registration must occur within 45 days of last day of chemotherapy cycle
  • BASELINE PRE-ENTRY CHEMOTHERAPY REQUIREMENTS:
  • Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  • Locally advanced unresectable disease (as defined per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] guidelines and institutional tumor board review)
  • Patients must have baseline pre-chemotherapy scans for staging. Options include: CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, CT chest/MRI abdomen/pelvis, CT chest/CT pelvis/MRI abdomen, or PET/CT performed prior to enrollment
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2
  • Required initial laboratory values:

All laboratory values must be obtained any time prior to initiation of chemotherapy up to 30 days post initiation of chemotherapy

  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • BASELINE CA19-9 AND BILIRUBIN REQUIREMENTS: The purpose is to obtain a baseline CA19-9 in the setting of a normal (or close to normal) bilirubin, since serologic response by serial CA19-9 measurements is part of post-chemotherapy eligibility criteria
  • If baseline CA19-9 > 37 U/mL the concurrent bilirubin must be ≤ 1.5 x ULN. (Note: if the bilirubin is not ≤ 1.5 x ULN both the CA19-9 and concurrent bilirubin can be repeated until bilirubin is ≤ 1.5 x ULN, as long as done within specified timeframe [up to 30 days post chemotherapy initiation])
  • If baseline CA19-9 U/mL ≤ 37, there are no restrictions on the required concurrent bilirubin level, and this can be the accepted baseline value
  • Prior radiation treatment
  • Has the patient had prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields
  • Prior non-overlapping radiation (e.g., breast, head and neck, extremity) is permitted
  • If uncertain about prior overlap, please contact the study principal investigator, Dr. Nina Sanford
  • POST PRE-ENTRY CHEMOTHERAPY REQUIREMENTS:
  • If baseline CA19-9 is elevated (defined as > 37 u/mL) the post-pre-entry chemotherapy CA19-9 must be less than 37 u/mL or a 50% decline from pre-chemotherapy level with absolute value less than 100u/mL
  • If baseline CA19-9 is not elevated (defined as ≤ 37 u/mL) the post-pre-entry chemotherapy CA19-9 must remain ≤ 37 u/mL
  • No active duodenal or gastric ulcers
  • No direct tumor invasion of the bowel or stomach
  • Restaging scans showing at least stable disease (no progression). Options for scans include: CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, CT chest/MRI abdomen/pelvis, or CT chest/CT pelvis/MRI abdomen, or PET/CT performed prior to enrollment, with restaging CT showing at least stable disease
  • Not pregnant and not nursing
  • No cardiac condition that was the primary reason for hospitalization in the last 6 months
  • New York Heart Association Functional Classification II or better (NYHA Functional Classification III/IV are not eligible) (Note: Patients with known history or current symptoms of cardiac disease, or history of treatment with cardiotoxic agents, should have a clinical risk assessment of cardiac function using the New York Heart Association Functional Classification.)
  • HIV-infected patients on effective anti-retroviral therapy with undetectable viral load within 6 months are eligible for this trial

Treatment and study plan

Biopsy Procedure

Procedure

Undergo tumor tissue biopsy

Other names: Biopsy, BIOPSY_TYPE, Bx

Biospecimen Collection

Procedure

Undergo blood sample collection

Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection

Capecitabine

Drug

Given capecitabine

Other names: Ro 09-1978/000, Xeloda

Computed Tomography

Procedure

Undergo CT or PET/CT

Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography

Dose-escalated Radiation Therapy

Radiation

Undergo dose-escalated radiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning

Other names: Dose-escalated RT

Fluorouracil

Drug

Given fluorouracil

Other names: 5 Fluorouracil, 5 Fluorouracilum, 5 FU, 5-Fluoro-2,4(1H, 3H)-pyrimidinedione, 5-Fluorouracil, 5-Fluracil, 5-Fu, 5FU, AccuSite, Carac, Fluoro Uracil, Fluouracil, Flurablastin, Fluracedyl, Fluracil, Fluril, Fluroblastin, Ribofluor, Ro 2-9757, Ro-2-9757

Gemcitabine

Drug

Given gemcitabine

Other names: dFdC, dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine

irinotecan hydrochloride

Drug

Given irinotecan hydrochloride

Other names: Campto, Camptosar, Camptothecin 11, Camptothecin-11, CPT 11, CPT-11, CPT11, Irinomedac, Irinotecan Hydrochloride Trihydrate, Irinotecan Monohydrochloride Trihydrate, U 101440E, U-101440E, U101440E

Irinotecan Sucrosofate

Drug

Given liposomal irinotecan

Other names: inotecan Hydrochloride as Sucrosulfate Salt Form Liposomal Formulation, Irinotecan Liposome, Irinotecan Sucrosofate Liposome, Irinotecan Sucrosofate-containing Pegylated Liposomal Formulation, MM 398, MM-398, MM398, nal-IRI, Nanoliposomal Irinotecan, Nanoliposomal Irinotecan as Sucrosofate, Nanoparticle Liposome Formulation of Irinotecan, Onivyde, PEP 02, PEP-02, PEP02

leucovorin calcium

Drug

Given leucovorin calcium

Other names: Adinepar, Calcifolin, Calcium (6S)-Folinate, Calcium Folinate, Calcium Leucovorin, Calfolex, Calinat, Cehafolin, Citofolin, Citrec, Citrovorum Factor, Cromatonbic Folinico, Dalisol, Disintox, Divical, Ecofol, Emovis, Factor, Citrovorum, Flynoken A, Folaren, Folaxin, FOLI-cell, Foliben, Folidan, Folidar, Folinac, Folinate Calcium, folinic acid, Folinic Acid Calcium Salt Pentahydrate, Folinoral, Folinvit, Foliplus, Folix, Imo, Lederfolat, Lederfolin, Leucosar, leucovorin, Rescufolin, Rescuvolin, Tonofolin, Wellcovorin

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Procedure

Undergo MRI

Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI

Nab-paclitaxel

Drug

Given nab-paclitaxel

Other names: ABI 007, ABI-007, ABI007, Abraxane, Albumin-bound Paclitaxel, Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Paclitaxel, Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Paclitaxel, Nanoparticle Paclitaxel, Naveruclif, Paclitaxel Albumin, paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation, Paclitaxel Nanoparticle Albumin-bound, Paclitaxel Protein-Bound, Protein-bound Paclitaxel

Observation Activity

Other

Undergo observation

Other names: Observation

Oxaliplatin

Drug

Given oxaliplatin

Other names: 1-OHP, Ai Heng, Aiheng, Dacotin, Dacplat, Diaminocyclohexane Oxalatoplatinum, Eloxatin, Eloxatine, Elplat, JM 83, JM-83, JM83, Oxalatoplatin, Oxalatoplatinum, RP 54780, RP-54780, RP54780, SR 96669, SR-96669, SR96669

Positron Emission Tomography

Procedure

Undergo PET/CT

Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, PT

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

radiation therapy

Radiation

Undergo standard radiation therapy

Other names: Cancer Radiotherapy, Energy Type, ENERGY_TYPE, Irradiate, Irradiated, Irradiation, Radiation, Radiation Therapy, NOS, Radiotherapeutics, Radiotherapy, RT, Therapy, Radiation

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of death or last follow-up, assessed up to 3 years

    OS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958). The 3-year OS estimates between the two arms will be compared using a Z-test. A logistic regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, including, but not limited to the stratification factor, which may be associated with 3-year OS. The primary hypothesis of improved 3-year OS will be tested with a 1-sided significance level of 0.023 (level based on not having stopped at either of the 2 planned interim analyses).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Local progression (LP)

    Time frame: From randomization to date of failure, date of death (competing event), or last known follow-up date, assessed up to 5 years

    Defined as progression of the primary tumor/nodes as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. LP will be estimated by the cumulative incidence method (Kalbfleish 1980), with death as a competing risk, and compared between treatment arms using Gray's test (Gray 1988). The Fine-Gray regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with LP (Fine 1999).

  2. Progression-free survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first PFS failure or last follow-up for patients without a reported PFS event, assessed up to 5 years

    Defined as local progression, distant failure, or death due to any cause. PFS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958) and estimates between treatment arms will be compared using the log-rank test (Mantel 1966). The Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with PFS (Cox 1972).

  3. Chemotherapy-free interval (CFI)

    Time frame: From the date of last dose of initial chemotherapy to the date of first dose of second line chemotherapy for progression, assessed up to 5 years

    Defined as the time in months without chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer post the initial chemotherapy treatment. Mean CFI will be compared between treatment arms using a Z-test. Regression modeling will be used to analyze the effects of factors, in addition to treatment, which may be associated with CFI.

  4. Long-term radiation-related ≥ grade 3 adverse events

    Time frame: Up to 1 year after randomization

    The percentage of patients on the dose-escalated radiation therapy arm will be reported.

  5. Incidence of ≥ grade 3 adverse events

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after randomization

    The percentage of patients will be compared between the treatment arms using a Z-test.

Other outcomes

  1. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) total score at 6 months

    Time frame: At 6 months

    Mean FACT-Hep total score at 6 months will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test, if normality is met, or Wilcoxon test if not. Regression modeling will be used to analyze the effects of factors (e.g. stratification factor and other relevant baseline factors), in addition to treatment, that may be associated with 6-month mean FACT-Hep Total Score.

  2. FACT-Hep score nadir

    Time frame: From baseline to 24 months from randomization

    The nadir is defined as the lowest score after baseline assessment. Mean nadir (for each of total score and Hep subscale) will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test, if normality is met, or Wilcoxon test if not, using 2-sided alpha=0.01 to account for multiple comparisons.

  3. FACT-Hep total score over time

    Time frame: From baseline to 24 months from randomization

    Longitudinal analyses incorporating all follow-up time points will be done using longitudinal linear modeling methods to assess FACT-Hep Total Score trends across time. Baseline scores, treatment arm, time, treatment by time interaction (if significant), the stratification factor, and relevant covariates will be included in the model analyses. Other than baseline score, treatment arm, and time, only covariates with a 2-sided p-value < 0.01, to account for multiple comparisons, will be retained in the model.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NRG Oncology

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III Randomized Trial of Dose Escalated Radiation in Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancer (LAPC) Patients (LAP100)

Acronym: LAP100

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2030
First posted
May 6, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.