Best Practice
OtherReceive healthy living education via phone call
Other names: standard of care, standard therapy
NCT Number: NCT04205955
This phase II trial studies how a diet intervention works in improving bowel dysfunction symptoms related in colon or rectal cancer survivors. Changing a diet may be helpful in reducing the severity of bowel symptoms, including diarrhea and constipation, and improve quality of life in colon or rectal cancer survivors and help doctors learn how to help patients better in the future.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
FHP Health Center-Guam, Tamuning, Guam
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare total bowel function score, as measured by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (BFI), at 18 weeks post-randomization between the intervention and attention control arms.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare total bowel function score at 26 weeks post-randomization between the intervention and attention control arms.
II. To compare bowel function subscale scores (dietary, urgency, frequency), as measured by the BFI at both 18- and 26- weeks post-randomization between the intervention and attention control arms.
III. To compare lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores (for anastomosis participants only), quality of life, and dietary quality at both 18- and 26- weeks post-randomization between the intervention and attention control arms.
IV. To compare motivation, self-efficacy, and positive/negative affect at both 18- and 26- weeks post-randomization between the intervention and attention control arms.
V. To assess study feasibility, adherence, retention, and acceptability at both 18 and 26 weeks post-randomization.
VI. To explore variation in primary and exploratory study outcomes according to sex, and to investigate whether intervention effects on the primary outcome differ across subgroups defined by sex.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive diet modification coaching via telephone for 10 sessions over 30-60 minutes over 17 weeks. Patients also receive 3 motivational messages per week via email and/or text message beginning after session 6.
ARM II: Patients receive general healthy living education via telephone for 10 sessions over 30-60 minutes over 17 weeks. Patients also receive 3 motivational messages per week via email and/or text message beginning after session 6.
After completion of study, patients are followed up at 26 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Receive healthy living education via phone call
Other names: standard of care, standard therapy
Receive diet modification coaching via phone call
Other names: Dietary Modification, intervention, dietary, Nutrition Intervention, Nutrition Interventions, Nutritional Interventions
Receive motivational messages via email and/or text message
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Time frame: At 18 weeks after randomization
Will be measured by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (BFI) total score. Score range 18-90. Higher scores indicate better bowel function. Will be conducted according to a modified intention-to-treat principle. Study arm differences in BFI at 18 weeks will be assessed by a linear regression model as a function of randomization assignment, BFI baseline value, and stratification factors.
Time frame: Up to week 26
Will describe using dietary, urgency, and frequency scales. Will be assessed by a repeated measures linear regression model as a function of randomization assignment, baseline value of the outcome, stratification factors, and visit. Robust standard errors will be estimated via generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between repeated outcome measures. The dependent variables will be transformed to approximate normality as appropriate.
Time frame: Up to week 26
LARS will be measured using the LARS Score. Will be assessed by a repeated measures linear regression model as a function of randomization assignment, baseline value of the outcome, stratification factors, and visit. Robust standard errors will be estimated via generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between repeated outcome measures. The dependent variables will be transformed to approximate normality as appropriate.
Time frame: Up to week 26
Will be measured by the City of Hope-Quality of Life-Colorectal Cancer. Will be assessed by a repeated measures linear regression model as a function of randomization assignment, baseline value of the outcome, stratification factors, and visit. Robust standard errors will be estimated via generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between repeated outcome measures. The dependent variables will be transformed to approximate normality as appropriate.
Time frame: Up to week 26
Will be based on the Healthy Eating Index 2015. Will be assessed by a repeated measures linear regression model as a function of randomization assignment, baseline value of the outcome, stratification factors, and visit. Robust standard errors will be estimated via generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between repeated outcome measures. The dependent variables will be transformed to approximate normality as appropriate.
Time frame: Up to week 26
Will be measured using a 10-item scale assessing motivation to change dietary behaviors in rectal cancer survivors. Will be assessed by a repeated measures linear regression model as a function of randomization assignment, baseline value of the outcome, stratification factors, and visit. Robust standard errors will be estimated via generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between repeated outcome measures. The dependent variables will be transformed to approximate normality as appropriate.
Time frame: Up to week 26
Will be measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms - Short Form 4a. Will be assessed by a repeated measures linear regression model as a function of randomization assignment, baseline value of the outcome, stratification factors, and visit. Robust standard errors will be estimated via generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between repeated outcome measures. The dependent variables will be transformed to approximate normality as appropriate.
Time frame: Up to week 26
Will be measured using the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short Form. Will be assessed by a repeated measures linear regression model as a function of randomization assignment, baseline value of the outcome, stratification factors, and visit. Robust standard errors will be estimated via generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between repeated outcome measures. The dependent variables will be transformed to approximate normality as appropriate.
Time frame: Up to week 26
Will be measured by the percentage of patients who successfully complete ("pass") the run-in period, and randomized. Accrual rates and feasibility will be summarized.
Time frame: Up to week 18
Will measure successful completion of intervention or attention control coaching calls. Adherence is defined as completing all five of sessions 1-5 and at least three of sessions 6-10 within 18 weeks after randomization. Study arm differences in adherence will be assessed by chi square tests.
Time frame: Up to week 26
Will be defined by completion of follow-up assessments in step 2, including those administered at follow-up site visits and the dietary recalls. Study arm differences in retention will be assessed by chi square tests.
Time frame: Up to week 26
Will be measured using the Acceptability of Intervention measure. Study program acceptability will be compared across arms via t-test.
SWOG Cancer Research Network
Network
A Randomized Trial of the Altering Intake, Managing Symptoms Intervention for Bowel Dysfunction in Rectal Cancer Survivors Compared to a Healthy Living Education Control: A Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy Study (AIMS-RC)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04505553
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoma
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02000050
Colorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases
Meldola, FC, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT02551237
Colorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases
Abbeville, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01751516
Colorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details