Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald
Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 17475, Germany
NCT Number: NCT01291693
The aim of this study is to investigate whether motivation-tailored alcohol interventions are more effective when delivered by person or by computer-generated feedback letters. A sample of 920 general hospital inpatients with risky drinking will be recruited through a computerized screening procedure. Patients with more severe alcohol problems will be excluded from the study. Participants will be allocated by time frame randomization to one of three study arms: (1) personal counseling based on Motivational Interviewing, (2) computer-expert system intervention that generates individualized feedback-letters, and (3) control group (treatment-as-usual). The interventions differ in their channel of delivery, but not regarding their content. Both intervention groups receive interventions at three time points: directly after the baseline-assessment at the general hospital, and 1 and 3 months later by mail and phone, respectively. Outcome will be assessed six, 12, 18 and 24 months after baseline.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 17475, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
At three time-points, participants receive counseling by health professionals trained in Motivational Interviewing based counseling. To assure that both interventions do not differ in their content, individual manuals generated by a software program are used. Counseling will be face-to-face during the hospital stay, and by phone one and three months later.
At three time points, participants receive feedback letters, tailored to the stages of change according to the TTM, and generated by a computer software program. The first letter is handed out during their hospital stay and includes normative feedback. One and three months later, participants receive ipsative feedback letters by mail.
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Determined by using average alcohol consumption per day, heavy occasional drinking, highest blood alcohol concentration, the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) score
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Assessed by a stages of change-algorithm
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Time frame: 6 months
Assessed by a modified short-form of the Alcohol-Abstinence-Self-Efficacy-Scale (AASE). The modified form assesses self-efficacy regarding compliance with drinking limits.
Time frame: 6 months
Assessed by a short form of the Alcohol Decisional Balance Scale (ADBS)
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
University Medicine Greifswald
Other
Testing Delivery Channels of Brief Motivational Alcohol Intervention Among General Hospital Inpatients With Risky Drinking: Personal Counseling Versus Computer-generated Feedback Letters
Acronym: PECO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04890652
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02559609
Hazardous Drinking, Unemployment
Middletown, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04078360
Hazardous Drinking
Panjim, Goa, India
View Trial DetailsNCT00443183
Harmful Drinking, Hazardous Drinking
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial Details