Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05373706

Testing Brief Personalized Feedback Integrating EMA Alcohol Cue Information

This study aims to develop a brief intervention that incorporates ecological momentary assessments (EMAs; i.e., four brief surveys per day for 17 days) to create personalized feedback targeting high-risk alcohol use among young adult drinkers. The intervention mainly focuses on providing feedback on individuals' drinking desire and how it varies as a function of a number of real-world factors. Other psycho-educational alcohol-related content is also provided in the intervention including strategies for decreasing exposure to cues that increase drinking desires and how to cope with increased desire to drink. This brief intervention will be used in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing young adults who receive the intervention with those who only complete identical assessments.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–24 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, 98155, United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to develop and test a brief intervention that provides personalized feedback to young adults using participants' own event-level, real-world experiences. The aim of the intervention is to increase young adults' awareness of their desire to drink as it varies as a function of a number of real-world factors including alcohol cues, social context, physical context, anticipation of later drinking, mood, and time of day. The intervention also aims to equip young adults with strategies for reducing exposure to factors that increase their desire to drink, how to cope with an increased desire to drink, and how to reduce potential harms from drinking.

This brief personalized feedback intervention is used in a randomized controlled trial comparing young adults who receive the intervention with those who complete the EMAs but do not receive any personalized feedback. Assessments include an eligibility survey, baseline assessment, 17 days of EMAs (4x/day), and follow-up assessments occurring 2-weeks and 3-months post-intervention. The 2-week and 3-month follow-ups occurred 2-weeks and 3-months, respectively, from Day 17 of the EMA period, because the intervention was delivered on Day 17. The intervention will be examined for its feasibility, acceptability, and its effects in reducing alcohol-related outcomes at the follow-up assessments.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1) Between ages 18-24, 2) Lives in Washington state, 3) Reports drinking at least two days per week in the last six months, 4) Reports at least one heavy drinking episode (4+/5+ drinks for women/men) in the past month, 5) Open to changing drinking behavior, 6) Schedule allows for participation in study with daily surveys, 7) Able to attend Zoom training session, 8) Must have cellphone for daily surveys.

Exclusion criteria

  • 1) Actively seeking treatment for alcohol use, 2) Currently participating in another study in our research center regarding young adult drinking behavior.

Treatment and study plan

Alcohol Cue Reactivity Personalized Feedback Intervention

Behavioral

This online brief intervention provides personalized feedback using EMA data focused on alcohol cue reactivity to reduce alcohol misuse among young adults.

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily Drinking Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 week follow-up, and 3 month follow-up

    Number of standard drinks consumed on each day of a typical week during the [past 3 months for baseline and 3-month follow-up; past two weeks for 2-week follow-up]. Participants responded on a scale from 0 (0 drinks) to 25 (25 or more drinks). Totals for each day are summed to calculate the typical number of drinks consumed per week.

  2. Number of Heavy Episodic Drinking Occasions

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 week follow-up, and 3 month follow-up

    Participants were asked, "During the past two weeks, how many times did you have [4/5 for females/males] or more drinks at one sitting?". Participants responded on a scale from 0 (0 times) to 10 (10 or more times) and possible range was 0-10.

  3. Penn Alcohol Craving Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 week follow-up, and 3 month follow-up

    Self-reported subjective alcohol craving during the past week. Response options were scored from "0" to "6" with text varying across items. A sum score of the five items was calculated and the possible range was from 0-30. Higher scores reflect more craving.

  4. Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 week follow-up, and 3 month follow-up

    Participants responded "no" (0) or "yes" (1) to whether they experienced each of 24 consequences during the [past 3 months for baseline and 3-month follow-up; past two weeks for 2-week follow-up]. A sum of the number of negative alcohol-related consequences was calculated and the possible range was 0-24.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Washington

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Registry information

Official study title

Development and Preliminary Examination of Two Brief Personalized Feedback Interventions Focused on Lab-based and EMA Alcohol Cues to Reduce Hazardous Young Adult Alcohol Use

Acronym: Project ACE

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
May 13, 2022
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.