afatinib
DrugFilm-coated tablet
Other names: GILOTRIF, GIOTRIF, XOVOLTIB
NCT Number: NCT03157089
The main objective is to assess the efficacy of afatinib in combination with pembrolizumab, as measured by objective response (OR) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC who progressed during or after first line platinum-based treatment.
The secondary objectives are to confirm the RP2D, assess the safety profile, and the secondary measures of clinical efficacy including disease control (DC), duration of objective response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and tumour shrinkage.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
HOP Côte de Nacre, Caen, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-- Note: Patients with previously treated brain metastases may participate provided they are radiologically stable i.e. without evidence of progression for at least four weeks by repeat imaging (note that the repeat imaging should be performed during study screening), clinically stable, and without requirement of steroids treatment for at least 14 days prior to first dose of study treatment. This exception does not include carcinomatous meningitis which is excluded regardless of clinical stability.
Film-coated tablet
Other names: GILOTRIF, GIOTRIF, XOVOLTIB
Solution for infusion
Other names: KEYTRUDA®
Time frame: Tumour assessment performed at screening (-28 days), week 9 (day 56-63) after study treatment (afatinib or pembrolizumab) start and every 9th week thereafter, up to 556 days.
Objective response rate is defined as percentage of participants with the best overall response of complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions) or confirmed partial response (PR, at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameter (SoD, longest diameter (LD) measured for all lesions except lymph nodes, where shortest diameter (ShD) was used) of target lesions, reference is baseline SoD). Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (Computerised tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) evaluation by the investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1.
Time frame: 21 days (1 treatment cycle) from study treatment (afatinib and pembrolizumab) administration.
Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) was to be calculated through a Bayesian logistic regression model (BLRM) with overdose control that was to be fitted to binary toxicity outcomes. After 12 patients had completed at least one cycle (one cycle equals 21 days and consists of one time infusion of pembrolizumab at Day 1 + daily intake of afatinib) of treatment, the prior distributions were to be updated through Gibbs sampling procedures with the accumulated dose limiting toxicity (DLT) data from the first treatment cycle. The estimate of parameters was to be updated as data were accumulated using the BLRM. At the end of the dose confirmation, the toxicity probability at each dose level was to be calculated to determine an estimate of the RP2D. Posterior probabilities for the rate of DLT were to be summarised from BLRM. Confirmation of the RP2D by the Safety Monitoring Committee (SMC) was to be based on these probabilities as well as on the review of other safety and laboratory data.
Time frame: Tumour assessment performed at screening (-28 days), week 9 (day 56-63) after study treatment (afatinib or pembrolizumab) start and every 9th week thereafter, up to 556 days.
Disease control rate was calculated as percentage of participants with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD, neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters (SoD), nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD, at least a 20% increase in the SoD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SoD recorded on study (including baseline), together with an absolute increase in the SoD of at least 5 millimeter (mm ) or the appearance of one or more new lesions). Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (Computerised tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) evaluation by the investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1.
Time frame: Tumour assessment performed at screening (-28 days), week 9 (day 56-63) after study treatment (afatinib or pembrolizumab) start and every 9th week thereafter, up to 436 days.
For participants who showed objective response, duration of objective response (DoR), was defined as the time from first documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) until the earliest of disease progression (PD) or death. Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (CT or MRI) evaluation by the investigators according to RECIST version 1.1. The number of participants with objective response who experienced the event "disease progression or death (whichever came first)" is reported instead of a metric summarizing the time-to-event data with unit of time, as the number analyzed was too small to perform a Kaplan-Meier-analysis.
Time frame: Tumour assessment performed at screening (-28 days), week 9 (day 56-63) after study treatment (afatinib or pembrolizumab) start and every 9th week thereafter, up to 556 days.
Progression-free survival was defined as the time (weeks) from the date of the first afatinib or pembrolizumab administration to the date of disease progression (at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter (SoD, longest diameter (LD) measured for all lesions except lymph nodes, where shortest diameter (ShD) was used) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SoD recorded on study (including baseline), together with an absolute increase in the SoD of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions) or death (if the patient died without progression). The date of progression for the primary analyses was determined based on investigator assessment. Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (Computerised tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) evaluation by the investigators according to RECIST version 1.1. Median and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: From Day 1 of study treatment (afatinib or pembrolizumab) administration up to a total of 574 days.
Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of treatment start to the date of death from any cause. Participants without event were censored. Median and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Tumour assessment performed at screening (-28 days), week 9 (day 56-63) after study treatment (afatinib or pembrolizumab) start and every 9th week thereafter, up to 556 days.
Tumour shrinkage (in millimeters) is defined as the difference between the minimum post-baseline sum of diameters of target lesions (SoD, longest for non-nodal lesions, short axis for nodal lesions) and the baseline sum of diameters of the same set of target lesions. Tumour shrinkage is reported as percentage change from baseline and represents the maximum decrease or the minimum increase from baseline in SoD in percentage of the baseline SoD. Negative values indicate a reduction in the SoD; positive values indicate an increase in the SoD. Tumour response was assessed based on local radiological image (CT or MRI) evaluation by the investigators according to RECIST 1.1.
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
LUX-Lung IO: A Phase II, Open Label, Non-randomised Study of Afatinib in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung
Acronym: LUX-Lung-IO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06532032
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04776447
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma Bronchiogenic Stage III
Alicante, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT04592523
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase, Bronchial Neoplasms
Busan, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT06678555
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details