Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
RadiationUndergo IMRT/VMAT
Other names: IMRT
NCT Number: NCT07215910
This phase III trial compares the effect of vorasidenib to placebo in combination with usual treatment, temozolomide, in treating patients with newly diagnosed grade 3 astrocytoma after radiation. Temozolomide is in a class of medications called alkylating agents. It works by damaging the cell's deoxyribonucleic acid and may kill tumor cells and slow down or stop tumor growth. Vorasidenib citrate blocks the proteins made by the mutated IDH1 and IDH2 genes, which may help keep tumor cells from growing. It is a type of enzyme inhibitor and a type of targeted therapy. Adding vorasidenib to the usual treatment, temozolomide, may be more effective than temozolomide alone in treating patients with newly diagnosed grade 3 astrocytoma after radiation therapy.
Interested in participating?
Request Info12 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, United States
The primary and secondary objectives of the study:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine if vorasidenib citrate (vorasidenib) and adjuvant temozolomide following radiation therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent review in patients with newly-diagnosed IDH-mutant astrocytoma (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 3) compared to placebo given with adjuvant temozolomide following radiation therapy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of vorasidenib versus (vs.) placebo in combination with temozolomide, following radiation therapy.
II. To evaluate PFS associated with vorasidenib vs. placebo in combination with temozolomide following radiation therapy, defined by local institutional review.
III. To evaluate the efficacy of vorasidenib vs. placebo in combination with adjuvant temozolomide, following radiation therapy, based on overall survival (OS).
IV. To evaluate the efficacy of vorasidenib vs. placebo in combination with temozolomide, following radiation therapy, based on objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) + partial response (PR), time to response, time to CR+PR, duration of response, and duration of CR+PR, with response assessed per the blinded independent review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria in patients with measurable tumor at baseline.
V. To evaluate the efficacy of vorasidenib vs. placebo in combination with temozolomide, following radiation therapy, based on ORR, CR+PR, time to response, time to CR+PR, duration of response, and duration of CR+PR, with response assessed per local institutional review or investigator using the RANO 2.0 criteria.
VI. To evaluate the efficacy of vorasidenib vs. placebo in combination with temozolomide, following radiation therapy, based on time to next intervention.
VII. To evaluate vorasidenib vs. placebo in combination with temozolomide, following radiation, with respect to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) and symptom burden as assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT).
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To correlate tumor genotype with PFS. II. To evaluate the effect of the addition of vorasidenib to adjuvant temozolomide on seizure control.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I (CONTROL): Patients receive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or pencil beam scanning (PBS) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) once daily (QD) on Monday-Friday for 33 fractions. Starting 4 weeks after radiotherapy, patients receive temozolomide orally (PO) QD on days 1-5 and placebo PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles of combination treatment repeat every 28 days for up to 12 months and placebo alone repeats every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the study.
ARM II (EXPERIMENTAL): Patients receive IMRT/VMAT or PBS or IMPT QD on Monday-Friday for 33 fractions. Starting 4 weeks after radiotherapy, patients receive temozolomide PO QD on days 1-5 and vorasidenib PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles of combination treatment repeat every 28 days for up to 12 months and vorasidenib alone repeats every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and MRI throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 4 months for the next 2 years, and then every 6 months for up to 10 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
Undergo IMRT/VMAT
Other names: IMRT
Undergo IMRT/VMAT
Other names: VMAT
Undergo PBS
Other names: PBS
Undergo IMPT
Other names: IMPT
Given PO
Given PO
Given PO
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo MRI
Other names: MRI
Ancillary Studies
Time frame: assessed up to 10 years
This is defined as the time from randomization to the time of documented disease progression, as determined by BICR using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria or death due to any cause. PFS distributions will be evaluated for each arm and will be graphically and quantitatively compared using Kaplan-Meier methods. These methods will be used to estimate the median PFS as well as 2-, 3-, and 5-year estimates for PFS by treatment arm along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Cox proportional hazards models will also be used to assess influential factors on PFS both in the univariate and the multivariable settings.
Time frame: up to 10 years
This is defined as the time from randomization to the time of documented disease progression, as determined by local (institutional/investigator) review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria or death due to any cause. PFS distributions will be evaluated for each arm and will be graphically and quantitatively compared using Kaplan-Meier methods. These methods will be used to estimate the median PFS as well as 2-, 3-, and 5-year estimates for PFS by treatment arm along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Cox proportional hazards models will also be used to assess influential factors on PFS both in the univariate and the multivariable settings.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
AEs will be evaluated by treatment regimen. Will be summarized per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and where toxicities will be defined as AEs that are deemed to be at least possibly treatment-related. The maximum grade for each type of treatment-related AE will be recorded for each patient, and the frequency of each will be summarized by treatment arm. Frequency tables and graphical evaluations of AEs and treatment-related AEs will be summarized and evaluated to assess if there are any patterns or differences in the rates or types of AEs.
Time frame: up to 10 years
This is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 2-, 3-, and 5-year rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Distributions will be compared between arms using the log rank test.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm. This is defined as the proportion of patients with measurable tumor at baseline who achieve a minor, partial, or complete response to therapy divided by the total number of patients with measurable tumor at baseline who were randomized and treated on that arm. Response will be determined by BICR using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Assuming the number of patients who respond to therapy on each arm is binomially distributed, these proportions along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be estimated.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm. This is defined as the proportion of patients with measurable tumor at baseline who achieve a partial or complete response to therapy divided by the total number of patients with measurable tumor at baseline who were randomized and treated on that arm. Response will be determined by BICR using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Assuming the number of patients who respond to therapy on each arm is binomially distributed, these proportions along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be estimated.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm. This is defined only for patients with measurable disease at baseline as the time from randomization to the date of response to treatment (minor, partial, or complete), as determined by BICR using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 6- and 12-month rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm. This is defined only for patients with measurable disease at baseline as the time from randomization to the date of response to treatment (partial or complete), as determined by BICR using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 6- and 12-month rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm for only patients who had measurable disease at baseline and achieved a response (minor, partial, or complete) while on treatment, as determined by BICR using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. This is defined as the time from the date of response to treatment (minor, partial, or complete) until the date of progression, as determined by BICR. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 1- and 2-year rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm for only patients who had measurable disease at baseline and achieved a response (partial or complete) while on treatment, as determined by BICR using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. This is defined as the time from the date of response to treatment (partial or complete) until the date of progression, as determined by BICR. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 1- and 2-year rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm. This is defined as the proportion of patients with measurable tumor at baseline who achieve a minor, partial, or complete response to therapy divided by the total number of patients with measurable tumor at baseline who were randomized and treated on that arm. Response will be determined by local, institutional / investigator review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Assuming the number of patients who respond to therapy on each arm is binomially distributed, these proportions along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be estimated.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm. This is defined as the proportion of patients with measurable tumor at baseline who achieve a partial or complete response to therapy divided by the total number of patients with measurable tumor at baseline who were randomized and treated on that arm. Response will be determined by local, institutional / investigator review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Assuming the number of patients who respond to therapy on each arm is binomially distributed, these proportions along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be estimated.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm. This is defined only for patients with measurable disease at baseline as the time from randomization to the date of response to treatment (minor, partial, or complete), as determined by local, institutional / investigator review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 6- and 12-month rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm. This is defined only for patients with measurable disease at baseline as the time from randomization to the date of response to treatment (partial or complete), as determined by local, institutional / investigator review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 6- and 12-month rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm for only patients who had measurable disease at baseline and achieved a response (minor, partial, or complete) while on treatment, as determined by local, institutional / investigator review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. This is defined as the time from the date of response to treatment (minor, partial, or complete) until the date of progression, as determined by local review. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 1- and 2-year rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm for only patients who had measurable disease at baseline and achieved a response (partial or complete) while on treatment, as determined by local, institutional / investigator review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. This is defined as the time from the date of response to treatment (partial or complete) until the date of progression, as determined by local review. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 1- and 2-year rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Will be summarized by treatment arm. This is defined as the time from randomization to the time of first subsequent non-protocol treatment. Distributions will be evaluated for each arm using the Kaplan Meier method to calculate 2-, 3-, and 5-year rates along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: up to 3 years
Will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-BR). The total score ranges from 0 to 200, with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: up to 3 years
Will be assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT). It consists of 23 symptoms rated on an 11-point scale (0 to 10) to indicate the presence and severity of the symptom, with 0 being "not present" and 10 being "as bad as you can imagine.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Testing of banked biospecimens to determine tumor genotypes will not be conducted until a protocol amendment or separate correlative science proposal is approved. Details of planned statistical analyses will be included in the amendment or proposal.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Results from the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) question for severity of seizures will be compared between arms.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Other
Phase III Trial of Radiotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Temozolomide in Combination With the IDH Inhibitor Vorasidenib vs Placebo in IDH-Mutated Newly-Diagnosed Grade 3 Astrocytomas
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05303519
Astrocytoma, Astrocytoma, Grade IV
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07468136
Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma, Astrocytoma
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07673666
Astrocytoma, Astrocytoma of Brain
Mumbai, India
View Trial DetailsNCT03528642
Astrocytoma, Astrocytoma, IDH-Mutant, Grade 2
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details