Tepotinib
DrugParticipants received a single oral dose of tepotinib in Part 1.
NCT Number: NCT03546608
The study investigated the effect of various degrees of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of tepotinib.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Qps Mra, Llc, Miami, Florida, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants received a single oral dose of tepotinib in Part 1.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
The area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) from time zero (dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at the last sampling time (tlast), as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination. AUC(0- inf)=AUC0-t plus Clastpred/lambda z where Clastpred was last predicted concentration. Lambda Z was terminal elimination rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down).
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) was taken directly from the observed concentration-time profile.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration (Tmax) was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Terminal half-life was calculated as log2 divided by lambda z. Lambda z was terminal elimination rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Apparent total body clearance of drug from plasma following extravascular administration, calculated as dose/AUC0-infinity for tepotinib.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase following extravascular administration for tepotinib was calculated. Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-infinity multiply by Lambda z) following single dose.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
AUCextra was defined as a percentage of AUC0-inf obtained by extrapolation: %AUCextra = (1- [AUC0-t/AUC0-inf])*100. %AUCextra was reported in terms of percentage of AUC0-inf.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
AUCextra was defined as a percentage of AUC0-inf obtained by extrapolation: %AUCextra = (1- [AUC0-t/AUC0-inf])*100. %AUCextra was reported in terms of percentage of AUC0-inf.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
AUCextra was defined as a percentage of AUC0-inf obtained by extrapolation: %AUCextra = (1- [AUC0-t/AUC0-inf])*100. %AUCextra was reported in terms of percentage of AUC0-inf.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Area under the concentration-time curve for unbound drug from time zero to infinity, calculated as AUC0-inf_pred multiplied by fu. Fu is the fraction of analyte unbound. Free fraction was calculated as the ratio of free concentration divided by total concentration at a given sampling point.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Maximum unbound plasma drug concentration, was calculated as Cmax*fu. Fu is the fraction of analyte unbound. Free fraction was calculated as the ratio of free concentration divided by total concentration at a given sampling point.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Unbound apparent oral clearance, was calculated as CL/f,u = Dose divided by AUC0-inf_pred/fu. Fu is the fraction of analyte unbound. Free fraction was calculated as the ratio of free concentration divided by total concentration at a given sampling point.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
AUC0-t at which the concentration was at or above lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was calculated according to the mixed log linear trapezoidal rule. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down).
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
The area under the concentration time curve (AUC) from time zero (dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at the last sampling time (tlast), as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination. AUC0-inf = AUC0-t plus Clastpred/lambda z where Clastpred was last predicted concentration. Lambda z was terminal elimination rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Cmax was taken directly from the observed concentration-time profile.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration (Tmax) was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Terminal half-life was calculated as log2 divided by lambda z. Lambda z was terminal elimination rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
The area under the concentration time curve (AUC) from time zero (dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at the last sampling time (tlast), as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination. AUC0-inf = AUC0-t plus Clastpred/lambda z where Clastpred was last predicted concentration. Lambda z was terminal elimination rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. Ratio of AUC0-inf of Metabolite (MSC2571109 or MSC2571107) to AUC0-inf of tepotinib was reported.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 288, 336 and 504 hours (for hepatic impaired participants only) post-dose on Day 1
Cmax was taken directly from the observed concentration-time profile. Ratio of Cmax of Metabolite (MSC2571109 or MSC2571107) to Cmax of tepotinib was reported.
Time frame: For Healthy Participants: Day 1 up to Day 15; For Hepatic Impaired Participants: Day 1 up to Day 22
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of Participants with TEAEs were reported.
Time frame: For Healthy Participants: Day 1 up to Day 15; For Hepatic Impaired Participants: Day 1 up to Day 22
Laboratory assessments included hematology, biochemistry, coagulation and urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. Clinical Significance was decided by the investigator.
Time frame: For Healthy Participants: Day 1 up to Day 15; For Hepatic Impaired Participants: Day 1 up to Day 22
Vital signs included body temperature, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate. The 12-lead ECGs were recorded after the participants have rested for at least 5 minutes in supine position. Number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs and ECG were reported. Clinical Significance was decided by the investigator.
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Industry
Open-Label, Parallel-Group Phase 1 Study to Investigate the Effect of Various Degrees of Hepatic Impairment on the PK, Safety and Tolerability of the c-Met Kinase Inhibitor Tepotinib
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03289234
Healthy, Hepatic Impairment
Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT04332432
Hepatic Impairment
Rialto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06736223
Hepatic Impairment
Sofia, Bulgaria
View Trial DetailsNCT06575959
Digestive System Diseases, Hepatic Impairment
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial Details