Medway Maritime Hospital
Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT00843908
The aim of this study is to assess whether the Miniarc suburethral sling is equivalent to the TVT in the treatment of women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). If equivalence is proven, the advantages to women with USI will be potentially significant since the Miniarc may be carried out as an office based procedure, negating the need for an anaesthetic and hospital admission. The investigators null hypothesis is that there is no difference in subjective or objective outcome between the TVT and the Miniarc in the treatment of USI.
Eligible women will be initially assessed with a full history and examination, King's Health Questionnaire and twin channel subtraction cystometry. They will be randomised (using a series of numbered opaque envelopes) to undergo either the TVT or Miniarc. Follow up will be at 6 weeks, with a subjective outcome measure and at 6 months with a repeat subjective assessment and repeat twin channel cystometry.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeFemale
Interventional
Not applicable
Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, United Kingdom
Description Randomised, prospective study. Objective and subjective outcomes to be evaluated 6 weeks an d6 months post-operatively.
Study population The number of patients enrolled in the study will be decided after consultation with a statistician.
All patients will be recruited from urogynaecology clinics at Medway Maritime Hospital. They will be female and have a urodynamic diagnosis of stress incontinence, having failed conservative management. Those deemed suitable for the TVT operation will be offered entry to the study.
Randomisation and blinding
Patients who have consented to take part in the study will be randomised to have either a conventional TVT (Group A) or a MiniArc (Group B). Each group will be run in parallel. Method of randomisation - consecutively numbered opaque envelopes detailing type of operation.
Patients will be blinded as to the type of tape used. Due to the obvious differences between the devices, it will not be possible to blind researchers to the type of tape.
Each patient will undergo a pre-operative assessment (which may be incorporated into the initial clinic visit), be admitted as an in-patient for the TVT/Mini-arc procedure, and attend a post-operative assessment visit. This last visit will be the exit point from the study. These are detailed below
Pre-operative Assessment
Surgical Technique
Group A will have the TVT inserted under spinal anaesthesia as described by Ulmsten12. Group B will have the MiniArc tape inserted under spinal anaesthesia. All procedures will be undertaken in an operating theatre environment, and carried out by Mr Duckett or a member of his team who has undergone appropriate training. Patients will be catheterised until 6 hours post-operatively. Those who void with a residual of less than 100mls will be discharged the day after the procedure.
Post-operative assessment
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Tension Free Vaginal Tape inserted in the conventional manner in a theatre environment
Other names: Advantage TVT, Boston Scientific
The Miniarc suburethral sling will be inserted in the conventional manner in a theatre environment under general anaesthesia
Other names: Miniarc, American Medical Systems
Time frame: 6 weeks and 6 months
Time frame: 6 weeks and 6 months
Time frame: Time of surgery
Time frame: 0-6 weeks
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Other
A Randomized Study of the Treatment of Urodynamic Stress Incontinence: the Tension Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) Versus the Miniarc Sling.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07542080
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06783699
Urodynamic Stress Incontinence
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT05205395
Urodynamic Stress Incontinence
View Trial DetailsNCT04978714
Cystocele, Detrusor Overactivity
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details