Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
NCT Number: NCT01421641
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of an intracervical lidocaine injection versus topical lidocaine gel on the pain experienced by patients undergoing tenaculum application to the cervix during office gynecologic procedures. This study will also evaluate how satisfied women are with the method of pain control used.
The researchers hypothesize that:
1. There is less pain perceived by patients undergoing placement of a tenaculum on the cervix when a lidocaine injection is used compared to a topical lidocaine gel. 2. Patients are more satisfied with pain control during the overall experience of undergoing tenaculum placement on the cervix when a lidocaine injection is used compared to a topical lidocaine gel.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Subjects who have already scheduled an IUD insertion or endometrial biopsy will be asked to join this study assessing two pain control interventions at the time of tenaculum application to the cervix during office gynecologic procedures. Only healthy women ages 18 and over with an indication for endometrial biopsy or IUD placement will be recruited. The participants will be randomized to one of two arms: an intracervical lidocaine injection versus topical lidocaine gel. They will be asked to indicate their level of pain and level of satisfaction using a Visual Analog Scale. The primary outcome, pain with tenaculum placement, and the secondary outcome, satisfaction with the experience of tenaculum placement, will be compared between the study groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Injection of 2 cc of 1% lidocaine solution at the anterior lip of the cervix using a standard 22 gauge spinal needle
Other names: Lidocaine injection, paracervical blocker
Application of 1cc of 2% lidocaine gel to the anterior lip of the cervix with a Q-tip
Other names: lidocaine gel, numbing gel
Time frame: After tenaculum placement
The primary outcome was pain at the time of tenaculum placement. Patient asked to pain scale using 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain, 100mm=worst pain of my life) during after tenaculum placement.
Time frame: after application of randomized intervention
Pain with the intervention (injection or gel application). Subjects are asked to complete pain scale using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain and 100mm=worst pain of my life)
Time frame: After placement of the tenaculum
Satisfaction with overall tenaculum placement procedure. Subjects asked to answer their overall satisfaction with the pain control. Subjects asked to complete 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=not at all satisfied to 100mm=very satisfied)
Oregon Health and Science University
Other
The Effect of Intracervical Lidocaine Injection Versus Topical Lidocaine Gel on the Pain Experienced by Patients Undergoing Tenaculum Application to the Cervix at the Time of an Office Gynecologic Procedure
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01248091
Cervical Pain, Neck Pain
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05624515
Cervical Pain, Neck Pain
Ávila, Completado, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05191043
Cervical Pain, Neck Pain
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT02868359
Cervical Pain, Neck Pain
Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
View Trial Details