Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04683913

Telerehabilitation Gait Modification

Excessive knee joint loads during walking can contribute to knee osteoarthritis progression. Changing the rotation of the foot (in-toeing or out-toeing) while walking can lower knee joint loads and improve pain and function. Telerehabilitation (using video or telephone communication to delivery rehabilitation) has shown promise in delivering exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis, but it is unknown if walking modifications can be delivered using this method. This study consists of a six-week walking modification program in people with knee osteoarthritis. Performance of the modification will be measured using motion capture and wearable sensors during practice and daily life.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Motion Analysis and Biofeedback Laboratory

Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada

About this study

Loads on the knee joint during walking are related to worsening of knee osteoarthritis. Changing walking motions to lower these knee joint loads is an emerging management strategy for knee osteoarthritis. Multiple studies have targeted a change in the position of the foot relative to the direction of walking (toe-in or toe-out walking) and have shown this walking modification to lower knee joint loads and improve symptoms (e.g. pain) related to knee osteoarthritis within the context of a walking program. Building off the many studies that have found telerehabilitation to be an effective method of providing exercise and pain-coping physical therapy, the investigators will use this method to provide walking modification treatment. Telerehabilitation (using video or teleconferencing to conduct the physical therapy appointment) provides a convenient and cost-effective method to work with patients and coordinate their treatment plan. To monitor progress with learning the walking modification, the investigators will use a custom sensor shoe that the participants will wear during daily walking activities over the six-week intervention. Overall, this study will investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a walking modification program delivered using video- or teleconference.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 50 years of age or older
  • Exhibit signs of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis based on a score of ≥2 on the Kellgren and Lawrence grading scale predominantly in the medial compartment.
  • Self-reported knee pain ≥ 3 / 10 on a numerical rating scale of pain (NRS; 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable") during most days of the previous month
  • Comfortable walking intermittently for 30 minutes
  • Fit into the available sizes of sensor shoes (between US women's 5 to men's 13)
  • Exhibits ≥2% reduction in knee adduction moment impulse at 10 degrees of change in toe-in or toe-out during the screening appointment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Any knee surgery or intraarticular injections within the past 6 months
  • A history of joint replacement surgery or high tibial osteotomy
  • Current or recent (within 6 weeks) corticosteroid injections
  • Use of a gait aid
  • Currently on a wait list for joint replacement surgery or high tibial osteotomy
  • Any inflammatory arthritic condition
  • Any other conditions that may affect normal gait or participation in an aerobic exercise program
  • Cannot attend all required appointments

Treatment and study plan

Foot rotation modification

Behavioral

The instruction of gait modification provided via teleconferencing sessions (5 over 6 weeks) focusing on increasing toe-in or toe-out angles by "as much as is comfortable".

Other names: gait modification

Waiting Period - Delayed Group

Other

Participants allocated to the Delayed Group will wait 6 weeks after their initial baseline, then complete a second baseline to provide a control condition. After the second baseline they will enter the intervention.

Other names: control

Primary outcomes

  1. Lab-measured Performance of Gait Modification

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

    Change in foot rotation angle between baseline and week 6 (follow-up) appointments measured using marker-based motion capture. Foot rotation is defined as the angle between the long axis of the foot and the walking direction. Measures of central tendency and variability will be extracted.

  2. Real-world Performance of Gait Modification

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1&2, Week 3&4, Week 5&6, Follow up (Week 6/12), Retention (Week 10/16)

    Change in absolute median foot rotation from baseline to each real-world walking bout (represented as a single data file on the sensor module), follow-up, and retention measured via the sensor shoe. Foot rotation is defined as the angle between the long axis of the foot and the walking direction. Measures of central tendency and variability will be extracted, in addition to the proportion of steps with a greater than or equal to 7 degree change.

  3. Intervention Adherence

    Time frame: Week 6

    Adherence will be measured by the ratio of telerehabilitation sessions the participant attends relative to the total sessions (5 total).

  4. Compliance With Gait Modification

    Time frame: Week 6

    Compliance will be estimated by self-reported confidence in performing the gait modification (where 0 = "no confidence" and 10 = "complete confidence") at follow up. Acceptable confidence ratings by week 6 are greater than or equal to 7/10.

  5. Difficulty in Performing the Modification

    Time frame: Week 6

    Difficulty of performing the modification at week 6. Difficulty measured on an NRS scale (0 = no difficulty and 10 = most difficulty possible). Acceptable difficulty by week 6 is less than or equal to 4/10.

  6. Satisfaction With the Treatment Program

    Time frame: Week 6

    Satisfaction with the gait modification program on a 7-point Likert scale where -3 = "extremely unsatisfied" and +3 = "extremely satisfied". Scores of +2 or +3 will be considered "satisfied" and acceptable.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knee-osteoarthritis Related Symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

    Change in pain (9 items), stiffness (7 items), physical function (17 items), and quality of life (4 items) will be measured by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score at baseline, follow up and retention. Each item is rated on a 5 points Likert scale where 0 = "No problems" and 4 = "Extreme Problems". Higher scores indicate better function. The scores are normalized to 0-100%.

  2. Knee Joint Moments

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

    Peaks and impulse of the knee adduction moment and knee flexion moment measured via in-laboratory gait analysis (force platforms and marker-based motion capture) at baseline, and follow up.

  3. Knee Joint Moment Impulse

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

    Impulse of the knee adduction and flexion moments.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Foot Progression Angle Modification: an Exploratory Six-week Telerehabilitation Intervention in People With Knee Osteoarthritis

Acronym: TELEMOD

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Dec 24, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 4, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.