Motion Analysis and Biofeedback Laboratory
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada
NCT Number: NCT04683913
Excessive knee joint loads during walking can contribute to knee osteoarthritis progression. Changing the rotation of the foot (in-toeing or out-toeing) while walking can lower knee joint loads and improve pain and function. Telerehabilitation (using video or telephone communication to delivery rehabilitation) has shown promise in delivering exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis, but it is unknown if walking modifications can be delivered using this method. This study consists of a six-week walking modification program in people with knee osteoarthritis. Performance of the modification will be measured using motion capture and wearable sensors during practice and daily life.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada
Loads on the knee joint during walking are related to worsening of knee osteoarthritis. Changing walking motions to lower these knee joint loads is an emerging management strategy for knee osteoarthritis. Multiple studies have targeted a change in the position of the foot relative to the direction of walking (toe-in or toe-out walking) and have shown this walking modification to lower knee joint loads and improve symptoms (e.g. pain) related to knee osteoarthritis within the context of a walking program. Building off the many studies that have found telerehabilitation to be an effective method of providing exercise and pain-coping physical therapy, the investigators will use this method to provide walking modification treatment. Telerehabilitation (using video or teleconferencing to conduct the physical therapy appointment) provides a convenient and cost-effective method to work with patients and coordinate their treatment plan. To monitor progress with learning the walking modification, the investigators will use a custom sensor shoe that the participants will wear during daily walking activities over the six-week intervention. Overall, this study will investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a walking modification program delivered using video- or teleconference.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The instruction of gait modification provided via teleconferencing sessions (5 over 6 weeks) focusing on increasing toe-in or toe-out angles by "as much as is comfortable".
Other names: gait modification
Participants allocated to the Delayed Group will wait 6 weeks after their initial baseline, then complete a second baseline to provide a control condition. After the second baseline they will enter the intervention.
Other names: control
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Change in foot rotation angle between baseline and week 6 (follow-up) appointments measured using marker-based motion capture. Foot rotation is defined as the angle between the long axis of the foot and the walking direction. Measures of central tendency and variability will be extracted.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1&2, Week 3&4, Week 5&6, Follow up (Week 6/12), Retention (Week 10/16)
Change in absolute median foot rotation from baseline to each real-world walking bout (represented as a single data file on the sensor module), follow-up, and retention measured via the sensor shoe. Foot rotation is defined as the angle between the long axis of the foot and the walking direction. Measures of central tendency and variability will be extracted, in addition to the proportion of steps with a greater than or equal to 7 degree change.
Time frame: Week 6
Adherence will be measured by the ratio of telerehabilitation sessions the participant attends relative to the total sessions (5 total).
Time frame: Week 6
Compliance will be estimated by self-reported confidence in performing the gait modification (where 0 = "no confidence" and 10 = "complete confidence") at follow up. Acceptable confidence ratings by week 6 are greater than or equal to 7/10.
Time frame: Week 6
Difficulty of performing the modification at week 6. Difficulty measured on an NRS scale (0 = no difficulty and 10 = most difficulty possible). Acceptable difficulty by week 6 is less than or equal to 4/10.
Time frame: Week 6
Satisfaction with the gait modification program on a 7-point Likert scale where -3 = "extremely unsatisfied" and +3 = "extremely satisfied". Scores of +2 or +3 will be considered "satisfied" and acceptable.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Change in pain (9 items), stiffness (7 items), physical function (17 items), and quality of life (4 items) will be measured by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score at baseline, follow up and retention. Each item is rated on a 5 points Likert scale where 0 = "No problems" and 4 = "Extreme Problems". Higher scores indicate better function. The scores are normalized to 0-100%.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Peaks and impulse of the knee adduction moment and knee flexion moment measured via in-laboratory gait analysis (force platforms and marker-based motion capture) at baseline, and follow up.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
Impulse of the knee adduction and flexion moments.
University of British Columbia
Other
Foot Progression Angle Modification: an Exploratory Six-week Telerehabilitation Intervention in People With Knee Osteoarthritis
Acronym: TELEMOD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07364578
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Banī Suwayf, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03895489
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06693648
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06522906
Arthritis, Behavior
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details