Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02270177

Telemedicine Versus Traditional Specialist Consultation for Headache: a Non-inferiority Trial

Headache is a frequent cause of visits to the GPs office, and the investigators have previously shown that this group accounts for about 20 % of patients referred to a general neurologic outpatient clinic.

To our knowledge, no previous study has investigated whether headache consultation through telemedicine provides equal health care outcomes compared to regular visit to the neurologist. If that's the case, a modern interactive health care system may give simpler and cheaper services for patients, saving travelling costs and community expenses. It may possibly also lead to reduced waiting lists, earlier diagnosis and treatment.

This is an open-labeled randomized non-inferiority trial of headache patients referred to a neurologic clinic in North-Norway. The aim of this study is to determine whether video consultations are non-inferior to regular consultations in diagnosing and treating primary headaches. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in patient satisfaction between the two groups. The outcome is assessed 3 and 12 months after the neurologic consultation.

Participants will be allocated to either a telemedicine consultation or a regular consultation at the neurologic outpatient clinic in the University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø. Both groups will undergo a structured and detailed interview to clarify the diagnosis and establish appropriate treatment. To ensure the best possible representation in the population, our goal is to include at least 70% of all the referred patients that meet the criteria for participation. The randomizations are made through a centralized 8-16 phone line to the research-department in Tromsø, at the University Hospital of North-Norway.

Both primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed in questionnaires sent three and 12 months after the consultation. In addition, the quality of the physicians' referrals and calculations of cost savings by using telemedicine will be evaluated.

The patients' informed consent will always be obtained before data collection. Patients are able to withdraw from the study at any time. Withdrawal will not affect the treatment or follow up. Local research ethics committee (REC) has approved the study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Neurology, University Hospital of North Norway

Tromsø, Troms, 9038, Norway

About this study

Epidemiological research shows that over half of Europe's population suffers from headache. Approximately 11% of the population suffers from migraine, over half of the population have tension-type headache, and 4% have chronic daily headaches. There is clear evidence that headaches, and especially migraines, are under- or misdiagnosed. Headache is a frequent cause of visits to the GPs office, and we have previously shown that this group accounts for about 20 % of patients referred to a general neurologic outpatient clinic.

To our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated whether headache consultations through telemedicine provides equal health care outcomes compared to regular visits to the neurologist. If that's the case, a modern interactive health care system may give simpler and cheaper services for patients, saving traveling costs and community expenses. It may possibly also lead to reduced waiting lists, earlier diagnosis and treatment.

This is an open-label randomized non-inferiority study of headache patients referred to our neurologic outpatient clinic. The aim of this study is to determine if video consultations are non-inferior to regular consultations in diagnosing and treating primary headaches. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in patient satisfaction between the two groups. The outcome is assessed 3 and 12 months after the neurologic consultation. We will allocate participants to either a telemedicine consultation or a regular consultation at the neurologic outpatient clinic in the University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø. Both groups will undergo a structured and detailed interview to clarify the diagnosis and establish appropriate treatment. All diagnoses are given by the most up to date version of The International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD). We will strive continuously to include all patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. To ensure the best possible representation in the population, our goal is to include at least 70% of all the referred patients that meet the criteria for participation in this study. The randomizations are made through a centralized 8-16 phone line to the research-department in Tromsø, at the University Hospital of North-Norway.

We will gather the primary and secondary endpoints from the recruited participants by questionnaires sent three and 12 months after the consultation. In addition, we are going to investigate the quality of the physicians' referrals, peoples' use of medications, alternative therapies as well as calculations of cost savings by using telemedicine.

The patients' informed consent will always be obtained before data collection. Patients are able to withdraw from the study at any time. Withdrawal will not affect the treatment or follow up. Local research ethics committee (REC) has approved the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Females and males ≥16 and ≤65 years of age
  • Referred to a neurologist for headache
  • No red flags (defined) suggestive of a secondary cause? No known underlying causes of headaches (secondary headaches) according to established criteria
  • Referred for diagnostic clarification and / or treatment
  • Waiting time ≤ 4 months from the date of the referral
  • speaking Norwegian language

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <16 years or > 65 years of age
  • Known underlying cause of the headache or the presence of red flags suggestive of secondary headaches.
  • Examined by a neurologist for headaches in a period of 2 years before referral
  • Waited longer than 4 months from the date of referral
  • Non-Norwegian speaker

Treatment and study plan

Telemedicine, videoconsultation

Other

We are investigating the use of videoconsultations (through telemedicine technology) in patients with primary headaches.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of satisfied participants

    Time frame: change from baseline at 3 months and 12 months

    Are you satisfied with the consultation? Yes/No

Secondary outcomes

  1. VAS satisfaction rating scale

    Time frame: 12 months

    Visual analog satisfaction scale 0-10, where 0 = least satisfied and 10 = most satisfied

  2. VAS pain scale

    Time frame: changes from baseline in VAS at 3 months and 12 months

    Headache measured by a visual analog scale 0-10, 0= no pain, 10=worst pain

  3. HIT-6

    Time frame: Changes from baseline in HIT 6 at 3 months and 12 months

    Headache impact test

  4. Job situation/occupation

    Time frame: changes from baseline in job situation at 3 months and 12 months

    Job situation/occupation

  5. numbers of consultations during follow up

    Time frame: numbers of consultations from baseline and after 12 months

    numbers of GP-consultations, hospital consultations and admissions

  6. number of pain killers, triptans and other medications for headache

    Time frame: at baseline, after 3 months and after 12 months

    number of medications for headache

  7. headache diagnosis

    Time frame: at baseline, after 3 months and 12 months

    Headache diagnosis after IHS criteria

Other outcomes

  1. Estimation of travelling distances to the neurologic outpatient clinic

    Time frame: travelling distance in kilometers for the neurologic consultation (telemedicine versus regular consultation) and the average travelling distance to the GP during the consecutive 11 months

    travelling distances in kilometers

  2. Expenses saved by using telemedicine

    Time frame: Expenses (travelling, lost income and days absent from work) for the neurologic consultation and the average expenses for GP-consultations during the consecutive 11 months

    Evaluation of the expenses associated with telemedicine compared to regular consultations (travelling expensis, lost earnings, days away from work,

  3. Number of headache days and headaches

    Time frame: change in number of headaches from baseline, at 3 months and 12 months

    Change in number of headache days per month and number of headahces per month

  4. Change in headache feature

    Time frame: Change in headache features from baseline, after 3 months and 12 months

    Is the headahce bether, worse or the same. Is the headahce more intens, less intens or unchanged.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital of North Norway

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Tromso

Registry information

Official study title

Patients' Satisfaction With Telemedicine Versus Traditional Specialist Consultation for Headache. An Open-labeled Randomized Non-inferiority Study Among Patients With Headache Referred to a Neurologic Outpatient Clinic

Acronym: VHS

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Oct 21, 2014
Registry last updated
Jun 14, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.