Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT05015634
This is a non-CTIMP randomised controlled trial looking at the utilisation of telemedicine devices to provide remote, clinically necessary, diagnostic information, without the need for hospital attendance that patients will take home with them following admission to hospital with a heart attack.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom
Following hospital admission with a heart attack, telemedicine equipment can provide patients with remote, clinically necessary diagnostic information without the need for hospital attendance, which they can take home when they discharge from the hospital. In this project, patients known to be at high risk of ACS are equipped and empowered to seek urgent medical attention without visiting the hospital, if they experience symptoms, and to determine whether or not to seek emergency treatment, with an immediate remote specialist consultation, as assessed by validated technology.
Those enrolled in the intervention group will be offered telemedicine packages upon discharge from the hospital. Those enrolled in the active arm will have their telemedicine package provided to the trial team when they conduct an ECG and seek medical attention. In contrast, in the control group, routine clinical care will be provided, as well as follow up by phone over 9 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patient develops possible cardiac symptoms, takes an ECG, BP and oxygen saturation as per their training. Patient will receive a phone call by the trial cardiologist who will have access to a high-quality ECG trace, as well as blood pressure and oxygen saturations, and coupled with the clinical history, can decide on the most appropriate course of further management. With remote follow up over the phone at 3, 6 and 9 months.
Standard routine clinical care will be carried out, with remote follow up over the phone at 3, 6 and 9 months.
Time frame: 6 months
At 6 months of follow up, compare formal admissions and not emergency room visits in intervention to control groups.
Time frame: 6 Months
Any emergency department visits not requiring admission or further intervention will be compared in both study groups at 6 months of follow up.
Time frame: From discharge to 9 months follow-up
Length of stay at 3, 6, and 9 months will be compared in both study groups.
Time frame: 6 months
At 6 months of follow up, compare all-cause mortality, morbidity
Time frame: 9 months
Number of participants with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 9 months follow-up.
Time frame: 6 months
Compare Medical intervention for for acute coronary syndromes or heart failure, including coronary angiography/ angioplasty, injectable therapy or oxygen therapy for both study groups when readmission to hospital.
Time frame: 9 months
The readmission rates for 9 months will be compared in both study groups.
Time frame: 3 months
Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7). Both instruments generate domain scores from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health status or angina-related quality of life. Questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-discharge) and 3 months post-discharge, and follow-up scores were compared with baseline values.
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7). Both instruments generate domain scores from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health status or angina-related quality of life. Questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-discharge) and 6 months post-discharge, and follow-up scores were compared with baseline values.
Time frame: 9 months
Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7). Both instruments generate domain scores from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health status or angina-related quality of life. Questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-discharge) and 9 months post-discharge, and follow-up scores were compared with baseline values.
Imperial College London
Other
Remote Acute Assessment of Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acronym: TELE-ACS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07331415
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases
Cabueñes, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05551429
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiac Rehabilitation
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02581540
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
View Trial DetailsNCT02648464
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Antirheumatic Agents
Helsinki, Finland
View Trial Details