Pôle Saint-Hélier
Rennes, Brittany Region, 35043, France
NCT Number: NCT05390762
The present study proposes to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial Telecare rehabilitation program at the functional level in people with chronic low back pain with major psycho-behavior maintenance. The hypothesis is that a personalized program combining remote psycho-professional and physical care by digital tools improves functional evaluation in these patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rennes, Brittany Region, 35043, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A common face to face day hospital combining physical therapies with psychotherapeutic support such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to combat kinesiophobia.
A Second phase of 5 weeks of telecare rehabilitation of the reconditioning type of 15 sessions.
A Second phase of 5 weeks of care in face to face day hospital of the reconditioning type of 15 sessions.
Time frame: 3 months after the end of rehabilitation
Overall score of the Oswestry self-questionnaire. The score goes from 0 to 50, It will be converted into a percentage (Score ODI). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation
The economic efficiency of personalized rehabilitation at the end of the rehabilitation measured by the cost of transport evaluated according to the functional evolution by Oswestry.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
The spontaneous pain measured by Visual Analogic Scale, from 0 to 100. The 0 represents no pain at all and 100 the worth pain imaginable.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
Measured finger ground distance in centimeters. The patient is asked to touch the ground with both hands while standing with the knees in extension. The distance between the fingertip and the ground is recorded. Higher the distance is, the better it is.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
Active range of motion of lumbar flexion and lumbar extension will be measured with two inclinometers. Higher the score is, the better it is.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
The sub pelvis muscle flexibility will be measured by goniometry and centimetry. Higher the score is, the better it is.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
Testing will be done 90 degrees of knee flexion using a wall. The maximum holding time will be determined with a chronometer (in seconds). Higher the score is, the better it is.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
Measured by the Sorensen-Biering Test (duration in seconds), higher the score is, the better it is.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
Measured by the Shirado test (duration in seconds), higher the score is, the better it is.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
The Anxiety and depression are assessed by the self administered Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD). It has 14 items from 0 to 3. 7 questions concern, depression and 7 anxiety. The total for each scale is 21. If the score is less than 7, there in no symptomatology.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
Assessment of the kinesiophobia index by the TAMPA questionnaire. There are 17 questions, from 1 to 4. If the score is high (more than 40 on 68), the kinesiophobia is significant.
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
Evaluation of the functional disability with the dallas pain questionnaire. It's divided in 4 parts : impact on daily activities, impact on the relation between professional activities and leisure, impact on the relation between anxiety and depression and the impact on sociability. The Dallas questionnaire evaluated the impact of pain from 0 (no impact) to 100% (maximum impact).
Time frame: 3 months after the end of rehabilitation
The rate of patients having resumed a professional activity and condition of resumption (part-time therapeutic or not, previous position or adapted position).
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation
Self-assessment compliance evaluated by an adherence booklet
Time frame: At the end of the rehabilitation program and 3 months after.
The acceptability will be assessed using a 18-item questionnaire based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Each questions are based on a Likert-type 5 point scale ranging from : 1=In total disagreement, 2= Somewhat disagree, 3= Neither agree nor disagree, 4= Somewhat agree, 5=In total agreement.
Pôle Saint Hélier
Other
Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of a Multidisciplinary Telecare Rehabilitation Program in Chronic Low Back Pain with Psychological Retention and Predominant Sociability : Single Center Randomized Controlled, Single-blind Trial
Acronym: TELELOMB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06840795
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06843785
Back Pain, Balance; Distorted
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06837753
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06787079
Back Pain, Behavior
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details