McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07181863
Managing both type 2 diabetes and mental health challenges can be difficult, and many people do not receive care that supports both. This study looks at how virtual health coaching and support from interdisciplinary care teams can help people better manage their health.
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a virtual health coaching program for adults living with type 2 diabetes and mental health challenges compared to usual care. The Technology-Enabled Collaborative Care for type 2 Diabetes and Mental health (TECC-DM) program includes weekly coaching calls, support from an interdisciplinary care team, and online tools to aid self-management. The findings from this study will be used to help improve services for people who have type 2 diabetes and co-occurring mental health symptoms.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
This research will:
Implement and evaluate a relation-driven care solution that integrates physical and mental healthcare for adults living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and comorbid mental health challenges. Applying the principles of relation-centred care which expands patient-centred care to all team members involved, the TECC-DM model was co-designed to improve collaborative care between and across sectors, settings, and professionals. This model enhances the core relationship between provider and patients while empowering the person to be an active agent in their health and care.
Assess the effectiveness of the TECC-DM intervention (n=80) on patient-relevant (quality of life) and provider-level (satisfaction) outcomes compared to usual care (n=80). Drawing upon established feasibility data, and delivered in addition to existing diabetes care, the TECC-DM model of care may address important health system challenges in primary care, including those related to access, resources, and skill mix, while delivering whole-person care.
Study the implementation of the TECC-DM model alongside its effectiveness. Engaging a partner advisory group, knowledge users, and clinicians reflects the shared values of our team and ensures that this research leverages a wealth of expertise and real-world insights to inform future applications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Health coaching is the active component of TECC-DM. In weekly 1-hour sessions, the coach builds a therapeutic relationship, supports goal-setting and behaviour change, addresses mental health needs, coordinates resources, and empowers participants to navigate care. Coaching is delivered according to a standardized protocol, in consultation with the virtual care team, and targets improvements in quality of life and goals of care. Coaches do not provide pharmacological treatment or replace usual diabetes care.
Participants receive usual diabetes care (e.g., primary care, endocrinology, community supports) plus 10 standardized educational emails over 12 weeks, delivered according to a consistent protocol. Unlike TECC-DM, this approach does not involve a therapeutic relationship, health coach, or interdisciplinary care team.
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up
Quality of life refers to an individual's overall well-being, encompassing physical, mental, emotional, and social dimensions of health. In this study, it is measured using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), which captures participants' perceptions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Unit of Measure: EQ-5D-5L index score. Minimum Value: 0 (the worst possible health state). Maximum Value: 100 (the best possible health state). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up
The DDS measures the emotional burden, regimen distress, interpersonal distress, and physician distress related to living with diabetes. Scores range from 1-6, with higher scores indicating greater distress. Outcome will be reported as mean change in total and subscale scores from baseline to 12 weeks and 6 months, with the proportion of participants achieving a clinically meaningful reduction (≥0.5 points) also reported.
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up
The GAIN-SS is a validated screener for internalizing and externalizing disorders, substance use, and crime/violence problems. Scores range from 0-15 per subscale, with higher scores indicating more symptoms. Outcome will be reported as change in total and domain scores from baseline to 12 weeks and 6 months, along with the number of participants with reduced symptom severity.
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up
The PSS measures the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful, with scores ranging from 0-40. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. Outcome will be reported as change in mean score from baseline to 12 weeks and 6 months, with distribution of participants across mild, moderate, and high stress categories also described.
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up
The PHQ-9 measures the presence and severity of depressive symptoms, with scores ranging from 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. Outcome will be reported as change in mean score from baseline to 12 weeks and 6 months, and the proportion of participants achieving clinically significant improvement (≥5-point reduction or remission, score <5).
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up
The DSMQ assesses key self-management domains including glucose monitoring, medication adherence, diet, and physical activity. Scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more effective self-management. Outcome will be reported as change in total and subscale scores from baseline to 12 weeks and 6 months.
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up
This questionnaire assesses use and integration of diabetes technologies such as continuous glucose monitoring, insulin pumps, and mobile applications. Higher scores indicate more frequent or effective use of technology for self-management. Outcome will be reported as change in mean scores from baseline to 12 weeks and 6 months.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
McMaster University
Other
Bridging Gaps, Enhancing Wellbeing: Examining the Effectiveness of the Technology-Enabled Collaborative Care for Diabetes and Mental Health (TECC-DM) Model
Acronym: TECC-DM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06822387
Adolescent Health, Behavior
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06398093
Diabetes Distress, Diabetes Mellitus
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07726589
Behavior, Diabetes Complications
Taipei, Zhongzheng District, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06972251
Diabetes Distress, Diabetes Mellitus
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details